Meta-Analysis of New-Onset Atrial Fibrillation Versus No History of Atrial Fibrillation in Patients With Noncardiac Critical Care Illness

Author(s):  
Kuldeep B. Shah ◽  
Jonathan Saado ◽  
Matthew Kerwin ◽  
Sula Mazimba ◽  
Younghoon Kwon ◽  
...  
Heart Rhythm ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (8) ◽  
pp. S358-S359
Author(s):  
Kuldeep Bharat Shah ◽  
Jonathan Saado ◽  
Matthew Kerwin ◽  
Sula Mazimba ◽  
Younghoon Kwon ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 59 (2) ◽  
pp. 72-77 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wei-ling Huang ◽  
Jun Yang ◽  
Jian Yang ◽  
Hui-bo Wang ◽  
Chao-jun Yang ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-4
Author(s):  
Aura Daniella Santi ◽  
Paolo Aquino ◽  
Molly Dorfman

Abstract The SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) pandemic has challenged our initial predictions of its ramifications, both short and long term. Cardiovascular manifestations of COVID-19 in children remain a topic of investigation as literature is lacking. We describe new onset atrial fibrillation in a child with a history of COVID-19 infection. Understanding of cardiogenic effects of COVID-19 can help minimise the delay in diagnosis.


2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Mengxia Zhang ◽  
Lin-ling Li ◽  
Qian-qian Zhao ◽  
Xiao-dong Peng ◽  
Kui Wu ◽  
...  

Background. There are distinct results for the relationship between new-onset atrial fibrillation (NOAF) and subsequent incident cancer. To date, no systematic analysis has been conducted on this issue. This study aims to explore the relationship between NOAF and the risk of developing cancer through a meta-analysis with a large sample size. Methods. Electronic databases, such as PubMed and EMBASE, were searched for published relevant studies on NOAF patients diagnosed with cancer after and during follow-ups, including reported records of baseline information and the statistical result of morbidity. Two investigators independently reviewed the articles and extracted the data using uniform standards and definitions. The meta-analysis was conducted using the Cochrane Program Review Manager. Results. This meta-analysis consisted of five cohort studies and one case-control study, which comprised 533,514 participants. The pooled relative risk (RR) for incident cancer was 1.24 (95% CI: 1.10–1.39, P=0.0003). The temporal trend analysis demonstrated that an increased risk of cancer was observed during the initial 90 days (RR: 3.44, 95% CI: 2.29–5.57, P<0.00001), but not after that. Lung cancer (RR: 1.51, 95% CI: 1.47–1.55, P<0.00001) was associated with NOAF, but not colorectal cancer and breast cancer. Conclusion. This meta-analysis provides evidence that NOAF is associated with increased risk of cancer. The risk of incident cancer particularly increases within 90 days after NOAF diagnosis, but not after that.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document