Beta-Blocker Use in Hypertension and Heart Failure (A Secondary Analysis of the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial)

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel N. Silverman ◽  
Jeanne du Fay de Lavallaz ◽  
Timothy B. Plante ◽  
Margaret M. Infeld ◽  
Parag Goyal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Systolic Blood Pressure ◽  
Beta Blocker ◽  
Secondary Analysis ◽  
Intervention Trial

scholarly journals Intensive blood pressure lowering in different age categories: insights from the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (6) ◽  
pp. 356-363 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christina Byrne ◽  
Manan Pareek ◽  
Muthiah Vaduganathan ◽  
Tor Biering-Sørensen ◽  
Arman Qamar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Systolic Blood Pressure ◽  
Primary Efficacy ◽  
Intervention Trial ◽  
Blood Pressure Lowering ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
Pressure Lowering ◽  
Intensive Blood Pressure

Abstract Aims The 2018 ESC/ESH guidelines for hypertension recommend differential management of patients who are <65, 65–79, and ≥80 years of age. However, it is unclear whether intensive blood pressure lowering is well-tolerated and modifies risk uniformly across the age spectrum. Methods and results SPRINT randomized 9361 high-risk adults without diabetes and age ≥50 years with systolic blood pressure 130–180 mmHg to either intensive or standard antihypertensive treatment. The primary efficacy endpoint was the composite of acute coronary syndromes, stroke, heart failure, or death from cardiovascular causes. The primary safety endpoint was composite serious adverse events. We assessed whether age modified the efficacy and safety of intensive vs. standard blood pressure lowering using Cox proportional-hazards regression and restricted cubic splines. In all, 3805 (41%), 4390 (47%), and 1166 (12%) were <65, 65–79, and ≥80 years. Mean age was similar between the two study groups (intensive group 67.9 ± 9.4 years vs. standard group 67.9 ± 9.5 years; P = 0.94). Median follow-up was 3.3 years. In multivariable models, age was linearly associated with the risk of stroke (P < 0.001) and non-linearly associated with the risk of primary efficacy events, death from cardiovascular causes, death from any cause, heart failure, and serious adverse events (P < 0.001). The safety and efficacy of intensive blood pressure lowering were not modified by age, whether tested continuously or categorically (P > 0.05). Conclusion In SPRINT, the benefits and risks of intensive blood pressure lowering did not differ according to the age categories proposed by the ESC/ESH guidelines for hypertension. Trial Registration SPRINT (Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial); ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01206062, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01206062.

Beta-blockers are associated with incident heart failure: a secondary analysis of the systolic blood pressure intervention (SPRINT) trial

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
D.N Silverman ◽  
J.D.F De Lavallaz ◽  
T.B Plante ◽  
P Goyal ◽  
M.M Infeld ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Systolic Blood Pressure ◽  
Beta Blocker ◽  
Antihypertensive Medication ◽  
Loop Diuretic ◽  
Beta Blockers ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Sensitivity Analyses ◽  
Funding Source

Abstract Background The Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT) evaluated whether a blood pressure (BP) goal of less than 120mmHg versus less than 140mmHg would reduce cardiovascular outcomes in subjects with at least one cardiovascular risk factor and without heart failure. Participating investigators were encouraged to use any antihypertensive medication class with a strong evidence base. The SPRINT trial was halted early due to a lower rate of the composite primary outcome in the 120mmHg group, which was mainly driven by a reduction in heart failure (HF). Objective As there is a concern that beta-blocker use may be associated with an excess risk for incident HF in subjects with a normal left ventricular systolic function, we evaluated the association between beta-blocker use and HF. Beta-blockers were compared with other major classes of antihypertensive medications. We also studied the association of antihypertensive class with loop-diuretic initiation. Methods and results In the 9,012 subjects, without HF at baseline, the association of beta-blocker exposure and incident HF was examined using time-variant competing risk analysis. Beta-blocker exposure was associated with an increased HF risk (HR 1.18; CI 1.07–1.30; p<0.001) and more frequent and earlier loop diuretic-use compared to other antihypertensive agents (both p<0.01). Sensitivity analyses of propensity-score matched cohorts confirmed a strong association of beta-blocker use and HF. Other major antihypertensive medication classes did not show this association. Conclusions Beta-blocker exposure was associated with a higher incidence of HF in hypertensive subjects without HF at baseline. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Public grant(s) – National budget only. Main funding source(s): National Institutes of Health

scholarly journals Intensive vs Standard Blood Pressure Control in Adults 80 Years or Older: A Secondary Analysis of the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial

2019 ◽  
Vol 68 (3) ◽  
pp. 496-504 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicholas M. Pajewski ◽  
Dan R. Berlowitz ◽  
Adam P. Bress ◽  
Kathryn E. Callahan ◽  
Alfred K. Cheung ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Systolic Blood Pressure ◽  
Blood Pressure Control ◽  
Secondary Analysis ◽  
Pressure Control ◽  
Intervention Trial

RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES AND ANATOMOSIS OF ARTERIOVENOUS FISTULAR IN PATIENTS WITH REGULARLY HEMODIALYSIS

2017 ◽  
pp. 88-92
Author(s):  
Van Hien Pham ◽  
Huu Vu Quang Nguyen ◽  
Tam Vo
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Renal Failure ◽  
Chronic Renal Failure ◽  
Cardiovascular Diseases ◽  
Systolic Blood Pressure ◽  
Diastolic Blood Pressure ◽  
Negative Correlation ◽  
Mean Value ◽  
The Mean

Background: Cardiovascular diseases are the leading cause of death in patients with chronic renal failure. When a patient undergoes dialysis, making AVF or AVG causes cardiovascular events. Understanding the relationship between complications: hypertension, heart failure, AVF or AVG (formation time, position, diameter) helps us monitor, detect, prevent and treatment of complications to limit the risk of death in patients with dialysis. Objective: Relationship between cardiovascular diseases and anatomosis of arteriovenous fistular in patients with regularly hemodialysis at Cho Ray Hospital. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted at Cho Ray Hospital from 2015 to 2016. The survey some cardiovascular diseases are done by clinical examination, tests for diagnostic imaging such as X-ray, electrocardiogram and echocardiogram: heart and diameter of anastomosis AVF, AVG. Results: The study population included 303 patients with chronic renal failure who were dialysis. Of which, patients aged 25-45 accounted for the highest proportion (43.9%). The proportion of male and female patients was similar (48.5% and 51.5% respectively). The mean value of systolic blood pressure on patients made AVF, AVG less than 12 months is higher than patients made AVF, AVG over 12 months, and there is negative correlation (r = -0.43) between AVF, AVG and systolic blood pressure (p <0.05). The mean value of diastolic blood pressure on patients made AVF, AVG less than 12 months is lower than patients made AVF, AVG over 12 months, and and there is positive correlation (r = -0.43) between AVF, AVG and diastolic blood pressure (p <0.05) (p <0.05). The prevalence of patients with heart failure made AVF, AVG over 12 months is higher than that of the under 12 months group, there is a negative correlation (r = - 0.43) between AVF, AVG diameter and EF index (p <0.05). Conclusion: It is important to note the diameter of anastomosis AVF, AVG in patients with chronic renal failure dialysis to limit cardiovascular complications, especially heart failure. Key words: Chronic kidney disease, hemodialysis.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document