Enteral Sodium Chloride Supplementation and Fluid Balance in Children Receiving Diuretics

The use of sodium chloride (NaCl) supplementation in children being prescribed diuretics is controversial due to concerns that supplementation could lead to fluid retention. This is a single-center retrospective study in which fluid balance and diuretic dosing was examined in children prescribed enteral NaCl supplements for hyponatremia while receiving loop diuretics. The aim of this study was to determine whether significant fluid retention occurred with the addition of NaCl. Fifty-five patients with 68 events were studied. The median age was 5.2 months, and 82% were hospitalized for cardiac disease. Daily fluid balance the seven days prior to NaCl supplementation was lower than the seven days after, with measurement of: median 17 mL/kg/day (7–26) vs. 22 mL/kg/day (13–35) (p = 0.0003). There was no change in patient weight after supplementation (p = 0.63). There was no difference in the median loop diuretic dose before and after supplementation, with the diuretic dose in furosemide equivalents of 3.2 mL/kg/day (2.3–4.4) vs. 3.2 mL/kg/day (2.2–4.7) (p = 0.50). There was no difference in the proportion of patients receiving thiazide diuretics after supplementation (56% before vs. 50% after (p = 0.10)). NaCl supplementation in children receiving loop diuretics increased calculated fluid balance, but weight was unchanged, and this was not associated with an increase in diuretic needs, suggesting clinicians did not consider the increase in fluid balance to be clinically significant.

Loop diuretic use following fluid resuscitation in the critically ill

Disclaimer In an effort to expedite the publication of articles, AJHP is posting manuscripts online as soon as possible after acceptance. Accepted manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and copyedited, but are posted online before technical formatting and author proofing. These manuscripts are not the final version of record and will be replaced with the final article (formatted per AJHP style and proofed by the authors) at a later time. Purpose To identify the incidence of continuation of newly initiated loop diuretics upon intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital discharge and identify factors associated with continuation. Methods This was a single-center retrospective study using electronic health records in the setting of adult ICUs at a quaternary care academic medical center. It involved patients with sepsis admitted to the ICU from January 1, 2014, to June 30, 2019, who received intravenous fluid resuscitation. The endpoints of interest were (1) the incidence of loop diuretic use during an ICU stay following fluid resuscitation, (2) continuation of loop diuretics following transition of care, and (3) potential factors associated with loop diuretic continuation after transition from the ICU. Results Of 3,591 patients who received intravenous fluid resuscitation for sepsis, 39.4% (n = 1,415) were newly started on loop diuretics during their ICU stay. Among patients who transitioned to the hospital ward from the ICU, loop diuretics were continued in 33% (388/1,193) of patients. At hospital discharge, 13.4% (52/388) of these patients were prescribed a loop diuretic to be used in the outpatient setting. History of liver disease, development of acute kidney injury, being on vasopressors while in the ICU, receiving blood products, and receiving greater than 90 mL/kg of bolus fluids were significant potential factors associated with loop diuretic continuation after transition from the ICU. Conclusion New initiation of loop diuretics following intravenous fluid resuscitation in patients with sepsis during an ICU stay is a common occurrence. Studies are needed to assess the effect of this practice on patient outcomes and resource utilization.

Under-recognition of heart failure in patients with atrial fibrillation and the impact of gender: a UK population-based cohort study

Background Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) complicated by heart failure (HF) have a poor prognosis. We investigated whether long term loop-diuretic therapy in patients with AF and no known diagnosis of HF, as a potential surrogate marker of undiagnosed HF, is also associated with worse outcomes. Methods Adults with incident AF were identified from UK primary and secondary care records between 2004 and 2016. Repeat prescriptions for loop diuretics, without a diagnosis of HF or documented non-cardiac indication, were classified as ‘isolated’ loop diuretic use. Results Amongst 124,256 people with incident AF (median 76 years, 47% women), 22,001 (17.7%) had a diagnosis of HF, and 22,325 (18.0%) had isolated loop diuretic use. During 2.9 (LQ-UQ 1–6) years’ follow-up, 12,182 patients were diagnosed with HF (incidence rate 3.2 [95% CI 3.1–3.3]/100 person-years). Of these, 3999 (32.8%) had prior isolated loop diuretic use, including 31% of patients diagnosed with HF following an emergency hospitalisation. The median time from AF to HF diagnosis was 3.6 (1.2–7.7) years in men versus 5.1 (1.8–9.9) years in women (p = 0.0001). In adjusted models, patients with isolated loop diuretic use had higher mortality (HR 1.42 [95% CI 1.37–1.47], p < 0.0005) and risk of HF hospitalisation (HR 1.60 [95% CI 1.42–1.80], p < 0.0005) than patients with no HF or loop diuretic use, and comparably poor survival to patients with diagnosed HF. Conclusions Loop diuretics are commonly prescribed to patients with AF and may indicate increased cardiovascular risk. Targeted evaluation of these patients may allow earlier HF diagnosis, timely intervention, and better outcomes, particularly amongst women with AF, in whom HF appears to be under-recognised and diagnosed later than in men.

TORASEMIDE FOR THE TREATMENT OF HEART FAILURE

Diuretics play a major role in the rst line treatment for the Congestive Heart Failure (CHF). These diuretics are currently and majorly used for symptomatic relief. Torasemide, a loop diuretic, is a newly developed loop diuretic, which has a longer half-life, longer duration for action, and higher bioavailability as compared to the other loop diuretics like furosemide. Torasemide, also works more effectively for the anti-aldosterone effect and vasorelaxation effect. Several studies have also suggested that torasemide has superior pharmacokinetics and pharmacological activities than that of furosemide. Results of several studies state that torasemide helps in improving the left ventricular function, reduces the mortality, as well as the frequency and duration of heart failure. Torasemide also improves the quality of life, tolerance and NYHA functional class in patients suffering from CHF. Based on these results, torasemide appears to be a promising loop diuretic for the rst line treatment and for better management of the patients with CHF. In this review, we provide a panorama of existing knowledge on the properties of torasemide, aimed at using it as a rst line of treatment for the patients in Congestive Heart Failure (CHF).