P251 STEADY-STATE SERUM IGG TROUGH LEVELS IS ADEQUATE FOR PHARMACOKINETIC ASSESSMENT IN IMMUNOGLOBULIN-TREATED PATIENTS WITH IMMUNODEFICIENCIES

2019 ◽  
Vol 123 (5) ◽  
pp. S45-S46
Author(s):  
Z. Li ◽  
B. McCoy ◽  
L. Yel
Author(s):  
Zhaoyang Li ◽  
Barbara McCoy ◽  
Werner Engl ◽  
Leman Yel

AbstractPatients with primary immunodeficiency diseases often require lifelong immunoglobulin (IG) therapy. Most clinical trials investigating IG therapies characterize serum immunoglobulin G (IgG) pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles by serially assessing serum IgG levels. This retrospective analysis evaluated whether steady-state serum IgG trough level measurement alone is adequate for PK assessment. Based on individual patient serum IgG trough levels from two pivotal trials (phase 2/3 European [NCT01412385] and North American [NCT01218438]) of weekly 20% subcutaneous IG (SCIG; Cuvitru, Ig20Gly), trough level-predicted IgG AUC (AUCτ,tp) were calculated and compared with the reported AUC calculated from serum IgG concentration-time profiles (AUCτ). In both studies, mean AUCτ,tp values for Ig20Gly were essentially equivalent to AUCτ with point estimates of geometric mean ratio (GMR) of AUCτ,tp/AUCτ near 1.0 and 90% CIs within 0.80–1.25. In contrast, for IVIG, 10%, mean AUCτ,tp values were lower than AUCτ by >20%, (GMR [90% CI]: 0.74 [0.70–0.78] and 0.77 [0.73–0.81] for the two studies, respectively). Mean AUCτ,tp values calculated for 4 other SCIG products (based on mean IgG trough levels reported in the literature/labels) were also essentially equivalent to the reported AUCτ (differences <10% for all except HyQvia, a facilitated SCIG product), while differences for IVIG products were >20%. In conclusion, steady-state serum IgG levels following weekly SCIG remain stable, allowing for reliable prediction of AUC over the dosing interval using trough IgG levels. These findings indicate that measuring steady-state serum IgG trough levels alone may be adequate for PK assessment of weekly SCIG.


1979 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 61-66 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adesh Jain ◽  
F. Gilbert McMahon ◽  
John T. Slattery ◽  
Gerhard Levy

2016 ◽  
Vol 33 (07) ◽  
pp. 678-682 ◽  
Author(s):  
Megan Schwartz ◽  
Joanna Wrobel ◽  
Carla Zeilmann ◽  
Jamalee Huntley

1987 ◽  
Vol 82 (6) ◽  
pp. 1102-1108 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ruth Falik ◽  
Belinda T. Flores ◽  
Leslie Shaw ◽  
Gene A. Gibson ◽  
Mark E. Josephson ◽  
...  

1983 ◽  
Vol 17 (12) ◽  
pp. 904-905 ◽  
Author(s):  
Del D. Miller ◽  
John B. Sawyer ◽  
J. Patrick Duffy

A cimetidine-nortriptyline interaction in a 52-year-old black male is reported. After concomitant administration of cimetidine and nortriptyline for two weeks, steady-state nortriptyline concentrations fell 42 percent when cimetidine was discontinued. Later, during rechallenge with cimetidine, serum nortriptyline concentrations increased significantly, but subsequently fell again when cimetidine was discontinued. The possible clinical consequences of this interaction are discussed.


PEDIATRICS ◽  
1983 ◽  
Vol 71 (1) ◽  
pp. 139-139
Author(s):  
J. M. WRIGHT

To the Editor.— The case report of carbamazepine intoxication secondary to isoniazid administration recently described in this journal1 is a clinically significant interaction. I have previously presented2 a similar case in which a patient receiving carbamazepine, valproate, and nitrazepam developed severe carbamazepine intoxication when isoniazid was added to the drug regimen. The patient was determined to have inherited the slow acetylator phenotype. On careful rechallenge, 300 mg of isoniazid increased carbamazepine steady-state serum concentrations by 85% and decreased carbamazepine clearance by 45%.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document