scholarly journals 282 NESTED: National Trauma Registry Study of Deprivation

2015 ◽  
Vol 66 (4) ◽  
pp. S101-S102 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Corfield ◽  
J. Pell ◽  
D. MacKay
2021 ◽  
Vol 36 (3) ◽  
pp. 251-259
Author(s):  
Michael Rozenfeld ◽  
Kobi Peleg ◽  
Adi Givon ◽  
Miklosh Bala ◽  
Gad Shaked ◽  
...  

AbstractIntroduction:Injury patterns are closely related to changes in behavior. Pandemics and measures undertaken against them may cause changes in behavior; therefore, changes in injury patterns during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak can be expected when compared to the parallel period in previous years.Study Objective:The aim of this study was to compare injury-related hospitalization patterns during the overall national lockdown period with parallel periods of previous years.Methods:A retrospective study was completed of all patients hospitalized from March 15 through April 30, for years 2016-2020. Data were obtained from 21 hospitals included in the national trauma registry during the study years. Clinical, demographic, and circumstantial parameters were compared amongst the years of the study.Results:The overall volume of injured patients significantly decreased during the lockdown period of the COVID-19 outbreak, with the greatest decrease registered for road traffic collisions (RTCs). Patients’ sex and ethnic compositions did not change, but a smaller proportion of children were hospitalized during the outbreak. Many more injuries were sustained at home during the outbreak, with proportions of injuries in all other localities significantly decreased. Injuries sustained during the COVID-19 outbreak were more severe, specifically due to an increase in severe injuries in RTCs and falls. The proportion of intensive care unit (ICU) hospitalizations did not change, however more surgeries were performed; patients stayed less days in hospital.Conclusions:The lockdown period of the COVID-19 outbreak led to a significant decrease in number of patients hospitalized due to trauma as compared to parallel periods of previous years. Nevertheless, trauma remains a major health care concern even during periods of high-impact disease outbreaks, in particular due to increased proportion of severe injuries and surgeries.


2009 ◽  
Vol 67 (6) ◽  
pp. 1421-1425 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stylianos Katsaragakis ◽  
Maria E. Theodoraki ◽  
Kostas Toutouzas ◽  
Panagiotis G. Drimousis ◽  
Antreas Larentzakis ◽  
...  

Brain Injury ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 34 (2) ◽  
pp. 213-223 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abebe Tiruneh ◽  
Maya Siman-Tov ◽  
Adi Givon ◽  
Israel Trauma Group ◽  
Kobi Peleg

Injury ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 45 (9) ◽  
pp. 1409-1412 ◽  
Author(s):  
Forat Swaid ◽  
Kobi Peleg ◽  
Ricardo Alfici ◽  
Ibrahim Matter ◽  
Oded Olsha ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (5) ◽  
pp. 390-393 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael M Dinh ◽  
Kendall J Bein ◽  
Susan Roncal ◽  
Alexandra L C Martiniuk ◽  
Soufiane Boufous

2011 ◽  
Vol 26 (S1) ◽  
pp. s13-s13 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Peleg

ObjectiveThe objective of this study was to compare injuries and hospital utilization and outcomes from terror and war for civilians and soldiers.BackgroundInjuries from terrorism and war are not necessarily comparable, especially among civilians and soldiers. For example, civilians have less direct exposure to conflict and are unprepared for injury, whereas soldiers are psychologically and physically prepared for combat on battlefields that often are far from trauma centers. Evidence-based studies distinguishing and characterizing differences in injuries according to conflict type and population group are lacking.MethodsA retrospective study was performed using hospitalization data from the Israel National Trauma Registry (10/2000–12/2006).ResultsTerrorism and war accounted for trauma hospitalizations among 1,784 civilians and 802 soldiers. Most civilians (93%) were injured in terrorism and transferred to trauma centers by land, whereas soldiers were transferred by land and air. Critical injuries and injuries to multiple body regions were more likely due to terrorism than war. Soldiers tended to present with less severe injuries from war than from terrorism. Rates of first admission to orthopedic surgery were greater for all casualties with the exception of civilians injured in terrorism who were equally likely to be admitted to the intensive care unit. In-hospital mortality was higher among terrorism (7%) than war (2%) casualties, and particularly among civilians.ConclusionsThis study provides evidence that substantial differences exist in injury characteristics and hospital resources required to treat civilians and soldiers injured in terrorism and war.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document