13P Comparison study of different programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) assays, readers and scoring methods in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC)

This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) and programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1), their associations with the clinicopathological characteristics, and the association between their levels in patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, ProQuest, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases were searched to obtain the relevant papers. Seven studies with 1152 patients were included in this study. Like the level of TILs, there were no significant associations between PD-L1 expression and tumor size, tumor stage, lymph node metastasis, histological grade, and Ki67 (All p-values ≥ 0.05). Furthermore, there was no significant association between PD-L1 expression with overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). In assessment of TILs and survival relationship, the results showed that a high level of TILs was associated with long-term OS (hazard ratios (HR) = 0.48, 95% CI: 0.30 to 0.77, p-value < 0.001) and DFS (HR = 0.53, 95% CI: 0.35 to 0.78, p-value < 0.001). The results displayed that tumoral PD-L1 expression was strongly associated with high levels of TILs in TNBC patients (OR = 8.34, 95% CI: 2.68 to 25.95, p-value < 0.001). In conclusion, the study has shown the prognostic value of TILs and a strong association between tumoral PD-L1 overexpression with TILs in TNBC patients.

Download Full-text

Positive correlation between programmed death ligand-1 and p53 in triple-negative breast cancer

OncoTargets and Therapy ◽

10.2147/ott.s209484 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol Volume 12 ◽

pp. 7193-7201 ◽

Cited By ~ 3

Author(s):

Yan Zeng ◽

Cheng-Long Wang ◽

Jie Xian ◽

Qian Ye ◽

Xue Qin ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Breast Cancer ◽

Triple Negative Breast Cancer ◽

Triple Negative ◽

Programmed Death Ligand 1 ◽

Positive Correlation ◽

Programmed Death

Download Full-text

Immunohistochemical comparison of three programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) assays in triple-negative breast cancer

PLoS ONE ◽

10.1371/journal.pone.0257860 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 16 (9) ◽

pp. e0257860

Author(s):

Katsuhiro Yoshikawa ◽

Mitsuaki Ishida ◽

Hirotsugu Yanai ◽

Koji Tsuta ◽

Mitsugu Sekimoto ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Breast Cancer ◽

Triple Negative Breast Cancer ◽

Evaluation Method ◽

Triple Negative ◽

Expression Profiles ◽

Tumor Diameter ◽

Substantial Agreement ◽

Programmed Death Ligand 1 ◽

Moderate Agreement ◽

Programmed Death

Background Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is the most aggressive type of breast cancer. A recent study demonstrated the efficacy of anti-PD-L1 (anti-programmed death ligand-1) immunotherapy in patients with TNBC. However, the identification of TNBC patients who may benefit from immunotherapy is a critical issue. Several assays have been used to evaluate PD-L1 expression, and a few studies comparing PD-L1 expression using various primary antibodies in TNBC tissues have been reported. However, the expression profiles of the PD-L1 using the 73–10 assay have not yet been analyzed in TNBC tissues. Methods We analyzed the PD-L1 immunohistochemical profiles of 62 women with TNBC using the 73–10, SP142 (companion diagnostic for atezolizumab), and E1L3N assays. PD-L1 expression on immune cells (ICs) and tumor cells (TCs) was also evaluated, and PD-L1 positivity was defined as a PD-L1-expressing ICs or TCs ≥ 1%. Results The expression rates of PD-L1 were 79.0%, 67.7%, and 46.8% on ICs, and 17.7%, 6.5%, and 12.9% on TCs using the 73–10, SP142, and E1L3N assays, respectively. The concordance rates between the 73–10 and SP142 assays were 85.5% (on ICs) and 88.7% (on TCs), respectively, and substantial agreement on ICs (coefficient 0.634) and moderate agreement (coefficient 0.485) on TCs were noted. Sample age and tumor diameter did not influence the ratio of PD-L1 expression among the assays. Conclusions The positive rate on ICs and TCs of the 73–10 assay was higher than that of the SP 142 and E1L3N assays. Although substantial agreement on ICs and moderate agreement on TCs between the 73–10 and SP142 assays was noted in the present cohort, further studies are needed to clarify the PD-L1 expression status using various primary antibodies in a larger patient population. This would lead to the establishment of an effective evaluation method to assess the predictive value of anti-PD-L1 immunotherapy.

Download Full-text