scholarly journals 1700P Functional status in older patients with lung and thoracic cancer

2021 ◽  
Vol 32 ◽  
pp. S1186-S1187
Author(s):  
A-L. Couderc ◽  
P. Tomasini ◽  
L. Greillier ◽  
E. Nouguerede ◽  
D. Rey ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Ann Helen Torstveit ◽  
Christine Miaskowski ◽  
Borghild Løyland ◽  
Ellen Karine Grov ◽  
Marianne Grønlie Guren ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ben Grodzinski ◽  
Rory Durham ◽  
Oliver Mowforth ◽  
Daniel Stubbs ◽  
Mark R N Kotter ◽  
...  

Abstract Objective Degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) is a disabling neurological condition. The underlying degenerative changes are known to be more common with age, but the impact of age on clinical aspects of DCM has never been synthesised. The objective of this study is to determine whether age is a significant predictor in three domains—clinical presentation, surgical management and post-operative outcomes of DCM. Methods a systematic review of the Medline and Embase databases (inception to 12 December 2019), registered with PROSPERO (CRD42019162077) and reported in accordance with preferred reporting items of systematic reviews and meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines, was conducted. The inclusion criteria were full text articles in English, evaluating the impact of age on clinical aspects of DCM. Results the initial search yielded 2,420 citations, of which 206 articles were eventually included. Age was found to be a significant predictor in a variety of measures. Within the presentation domain, older patients have a worse pre-operative functional status. Within the management domain, older patients are more likely to undergo posterior surgery, with more levels decompressed. Within the outcomes domain, older patients have a worse post-operative functional status, but a similar amount of improvement in functional status. Because of heterogenous data reporting, meta-analysis was not possible. Conclusion the current evidence demonstrates that age significantly influences the presentation, management and outcomes of DCM. Although older patients have worse health at all individual timepoints, they experience the same absolute benefit from surgery as younger patients. This finding is of particular relevance when considering the eligibility of older patients for surgery.


2014 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 26-32 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benedicte Rønning ◽  
Torgeir Bruun Wyller ◽  
Marit Slaaen Jordhøy ◽  
Arild Nesbakken ◽  
Arne Bakka ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 192 (1) ◽  
pp. 19-26 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ashley L. Miller ◽  
Lillian C. Min ◽  
Kathleen M. Diehl ◽  
David C. Cron ◽  
Chiao-Li Chan ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 1791-1791 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven I. Park ◽  
Kristy L. Richards ◽  
Adam S. Asch ◽  
Oludamilola Olajide ◽  
Allison M. Deal ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Bendamustine in combination with rituximab (BR) has shown to be similar, if not superior, in efficacy with more favorable side-effect profiles compared to R-CHOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin hydrochloride, vincristine, and prednisone) for front-line treatment of indolent B-cell lymphoma. In addition, bendamustine 120 mg/m2 in combination with rituximab 375 mg/m2 was associated with high response rates and acceptable toxicity even in older patients with relapsed or refractory aggressive B-cell lymphoma. Clinical evaluation of BR is warranted in the front-line setting for DLBCL patients not eligible for anthracyclines or very elderly, for whom the standard therapy has not been established. Methods In this single-arm phase II study, patients with ≥65 years of age who were deemed poor candidates for R-CHOP therapy at the discretion of the treating physician were enrolled through the UNC Cancer Network to determine the efficacy and safety of BR in previously untreated stage II-IV DLBCL (ClinicalTrials.gov #NCT01234467). Patients received bendamustine at a dose of 120 mg/m2 daily on days 1 and 2 of each 21-day cycle along with rituximab on day 1 for up to 8 cycles of therapy. Patients with ECOG score of 3 at baseline were allowed to receive bendamustine at a dose of 90 mg/m2 daily, and the dose would increase to 120 mg/m2 daily if their ECOG score improved to ≤ 2 after 3 cycles of BR. Pre-phase steroid therapy with prednisone 100 mg daily for five days was permitted prior to the initiation of BR in patients with poor functional status at the initial presentation. Results Twenty three patients were enrolled with the majority (83%) having stage III or IV disease at baseline. The median age was 80 years (range 65 – 89), and 78% of patients had IPI score of ≥3. More than half the patients (52%) presented with poor functional status with ECOG score of ≥2 prior to therapy, including six patients with ECOG score of 3. The overall response rate was 93% with a complete response rate of 60% for 15 evaluable patients. The median time to progression (TTP) was 7.4 months. The median survival was 9.9 months (95% CI of 3.6 – 10.9) for all patients, but for patients with ECOG score of ≥2, the median survival was 3.6 months (1.4 – 6.0). Grade 3/4 AEs observed in > 10% of patients were anemia (27%), neutropenia (18%), lymphopenia (68%), thrombocytopenia (18%), and fatigue (14%). Four grade 5 treatment-related AEs, including two cases of pneumonia and two cases of anorexia, were reported. Four deaths were directly related to disease progression during or after treatment. Six patients died of other causes, including cerebral vascular accidents, congestive heart failure, and hip fracture, which were felt to be related to the patients' underlying comorbidities. Overall survival at 12 months was 25% (8.2 – 46.9). Conclusions Combination therapy with BR demonstrates high response rates in older patients who were deemed poor candidates for the standard R-CHOP therapy for treatment of previously untreated DLBCL. However, the survival rates were not considered promising in this older frail patient population. BR, especially with a high dose of bendamustine, should be used with great caution in future clinical trials involving older DLBCL patients with poor functional status. Disclosures: Park: Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Research Funding; TEVA: Research Funding. Off Label Use: bendamustine in previously untreated DLBCL.


2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 8519-8519 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. B. Elkin ◽  
S. Lee ◽  
E. S. Casper ◽  
D. Kissane ◽  
N. E. Kemeny ◽  
...  

8519 Background: Shared decision-making is a tenet of contemporary oncology practice. However, it is uncertain how involved elderly patients want to be in making treatment decisions and how physicians perceive patient preferences for involvement in decision-making. Methods: In structured interviews about multiple facets of chemotherapy treatment decision-making, we asked patients age 70 and older seen at our specialty cancer center with a recent diagnosis of metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) about their preferences for making treatment decisions. We used Degner’s control preference scale to measure patient preference for decision control. Treating oncologists described their perception of each patient’s preference for decision control using the same scale. Control preference was assessed in relation to socio-demographic characteristics and functional status. Results: Of 52 patients interviewed, the mean age was 76 years (range 70–89), 52% were male, 60% were educated beyond high school and 25% required some help with activities of daily living (ADL). Preferences for involvement in treatment decision-making demonstrated marked variation (Table). Compared with female patients, males expressed a stronger preference for decision control (p<0.05). Preference for decision control was somewhat greater in patients under age 80, those with more education, and those with no ADL impairment, but these associations were not statistically significant. In 26% of cases, the treating physician’s perception and the patient’s expressed preference for decision control were concordant. Conclusions: In older patients with advanced CRC, preference for control in treatment decision-making shows marked heterogeneity and some correlation with socio-demographic characteristics and functional status. Physicians’ perceptions of patient preference for decision control are often inconsistent with patients’ actual preferences. [Table: see text] No significant financial relationships to disclose.


Author(s):  
Anne-Laure Couderc ◽  
Pierre Suchon ◽  
Bérengère Saliba-Serre ◽  
Dominique Rey ◽  
Emilie Nouguerede ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document