scholarly journals Proactive Coping Poststroke: Psychometric Properties of the Utrecht Proactive Coping Competence Scale

2014 ◽  
Vol 95 (4) ◽  
pp. 670-675 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nienke S. Tielemans ◽  
Johanna M. Visser-Meily ◽  
Vera P. Schepers ◽  
Marcel W. Post ◽  
Caroline M. van Heugten
2017 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
pp. E162-E172
Author(s):  
Neda Mirbagher Ajorpaz ◽  
Mansoureh Zagheri Tafreshi ◽  
Jamileh Mohtashami ◽  
Farid Zayeri ◽  
Zahra Rahemi

The clinical competence of nursing students in operating room (OR) is an important issue in nursing education. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Persian Perceived Perioperative Competence Scale–Revised (PPCS-R) instrument. This cross-sectional study was conducted across 12 universities in Iran. The psychometric properties and factor structure of the PPCS-R for OR students was examined. Based on the results of factor analysis, seven items were removed from the original version of the scale. The fitness indices of the Persian scale include comparative fit index (CFI) 5 .90, goodness-of-fit-index (GFI) 5 .86, adjusted goodness-of-fit index (AGFI) 5 .90, normed fit index (NFI) 5 .84, and root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) 5 .04. High validity and reliability indicated the scale’s value for measuring perceived perioperative competence of Iranian OR students.


2019 ◽  
Vol 5 ◽  
pp. 237796081983146 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joko Gunawan ◽  
Yupin Aungsuroch ◽  
Mary L. Fisher ◽  
Anna M. McDaniel

This study aimed to develop and psychometrically test the managerial competence scale for first-line nurse managers (FLNMs) in Indonesia. The scale was based on items derived from an integrative review and interviews with experts. A total of 300 FLNMs from 16 public hospitals were randomly selected for this test of psychometric properties. A principal component analysis generated seven dimensions with 43 items as a final scale, with overall Cronbach's α of .95 while the dimensions' Cronbach's α ranged from .71 to .90. The findings demonstrate that the scale is valid and reliable as a vehicle for assessment of managerial competence of FLNMs.


Aphasiology ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 33 (5) ◽  
pp. 520-543 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kris L. Brock ◽  
Rajinder Koul ◽  
Melinda Corwin ◽  
Ralf W. Schlosser

2010 ◽  
Vol 109 (1-3) ◽  
pp. 167-174 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nancy M. Petry ◽  
Sheila M. Alessi ◽  
David M. Ledgerwood ◽  
Sean Sierra

2013 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 249-259 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin S. Sutherland ◽  
Bryce D. McLeod ◽  
Maureen A. Conroy ◽  
Lisa M. Abrams ◽  
Meghan M. Smith

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kata Ivanišević ◽  
Radoslav Kosić ◽  
Sandra Bošković ◽  
Marija Bukvić

Abstract Purpose: The purpose of this research was to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Nurse Professional Competence Scale in Croatia, in order to implement it as a valid and reliable tool for the evaluation of nurses’ competence.Design: Psychometric instrument validation study.Methods: The validity of the contents and construction, as well as internal consistency, and affirmative factor analysis were measured. Nurse Professional Competence Scale has been distributed to 311 nurses who completed undergraduate or graduate nursing studies. All participants completed an online survey. The data was collected between April and July 2020.Results: The six-factor structure (Nursing care, Value-Based Nursing, Medical and Technical Care, Care Pedagogics, Documentation and Administration of Nursing Care, and Development, Leadership and Organization of Nursing Care) of the Nurse Professional Competence Scale has been confirmed by confirmatory factor analysis. Cronbach's alpha equals to 0.92.Conclusions: Psychometric properties of the Nurse Professional Competence Scale in the Republic of Croatia show that the scale is reliable and valid as a measurement instrument, and can be used as such in research to assess the quality of professional competencies of nurses.


BMC Nursing ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mirko Prosen ◽  
Andreja Kvas ◽  
Sandra Bošković ◽  
Sabina Ličen

Abstract Background The competency-based approach to the assessment of nursing practice has been adopted as a key policy in the developed world. The continual self-assessment of competence gives nurses the opportunity to reflect on their competencies and has a significant impact on the quality of nursing practice and patient safety. The study was designed to describe the process of cross-cultural adaptation and to assess the psychometric properties of the Slovenian version of a short form of the Nurse Professional Competence scale (NPC-SF) and to evaluate the efficacy of this instrument in a sample of registered nurses. Methods A cross-sectional and validation study was conducted in 425 registered nurses to test the psychometric properties of the Slovenian version of a short form of the scale and to evaluate nurses’ professional competence. A multilevel approach was used: Translation, back-translation, language validity, face and content validity, construct validity, and reliability of the Slovenian version of the scale were analysed respectively. Participants completed an online survey, with the data being collected between April and July 2020. Results Factor analysis showed that the Slovenian version of the scale could be used in four dimensions explained with 65 % of the variance. Cronbach’s α was 0.972. The four-factor model fit the data (RMSEA = 0.083, CFI = 0.731). Self-reported competence was high and rated higher by nurses employed at the tertiary level of healthcare, followed by nurses employed at the secondary and primary, and from social care institutions. Nurses with more years of experience assessed their competence higher. Conclusions The NPC-SF helps understand and identify nurses’ self-reported core competencies in clinical settings, thereby providing an important predictor of the professional development of nursing. The Slovenian version of the scale demonstrated acceptable psychometric properties and may be used in research and clinical practice to evaluate nurses’ professional competence.


2008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angela D. Moreland ◽  
Jean E. Dumas

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document