scholarly journals Design, additive manufacturing, and performance of heat exchanger with a novel flow-path architecture

2020 ◽  
Vol 180 ◽  
pp. 115775 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adrian S. Sabau ◽  
Adrian Bejan ◽  
David Brownell ◽  
Kyle Gluesenkamp ◽  
Bart Murphy ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Yenny Rua ◽  
Russell Muren ◽  
Shanon Reckinger

This work describes the testing of microfluidic components created using additive manufacturing. An Objet Eden 250 was used to create microfluidic channel test coupons with passages ranging from 0.5 to 3.0 mm and wall thicknesses ranging from 0.032 to 0.5 mm. Coupons were cleaned and tested under flow to examine structural integrity. Microfluidic channels with wall thicknesses down to 0.032 mm could be printed, cleaned, and tested successfully, although plastic deformation was observed in coupons with wall thicknesses below 0.1 mm. Given these limits, additive manufacturing based microfluidic heat exchangers (HXs) offer cost and performance benefits in natural convection HX applications.


2021 ◽  
Vol 1 ◽  
pp. 2841-2850
Author(s):  
Didunoluwa Obilanade ◽  
Christo Dordlofva ◽  
Peter Törlind

AbstractOne often-cited benefit of using metal additive manufacturing (AM) is the possibility to design and produce complex geometries that suit the required function and performance of end-use parts. In this context, laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) is one suitable AM process. Due to accessibility issues and cost-reduction potentials, such ‘complex’ LPBF parts should utilise net-shape manufacturing with minimal use of post-process machining. The inherent surface roughness of LPBF could, however, impede part performance, especially from a structural perspective and in particular regarding fatigue. Engineers must therefore understand the influence of surface roughness on part performance and how to consider it during design. This paper presents a systematic literature review of research related to LPBF surface roughness. In general, research focuses on the relationship between surface roughness and LPBF build parameters, material properties, or post-processing. Research on design support on how to consider surface roughness during design for AM is however scarce. Future research on such supports is therefore important given the effects of surface roughness highlighted in other research fields.


RSC Advances ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (72) ◽  
pp. 44323-44331
Author(s):  
Hanyu Xue ◽  
Xinzhong Li ◽  
Jianrong Xia ◽  
Qi Lin

Improving the adhesion between layers and achieving the recycling of resins are challenges in additive manufacturing (AM) technology.


Polymers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (7) ◽  
pp. 1175
Author(s):  
Tereza Kroulíková ◽  
Tereza Kůdelová ◽  
Erik Bartuli ◽  
Jan Vančura ◽  
Ilya Astrouski

A novel heat exchanger for automotive applications developed by the Heat Transfer and Fluid Flow Laboratory at the Brno University of Technology, Czech Republic, is compared with a conventional commercially available metal radiator. The heat transfer surface of this heat exchanger is composed of polymeric hollow fibers made from polyamide 612 by DuPont (Zytel LC6159). The cross-section of the polymeric radiator is identical to the aluminum radiator (louvered fins on flat tubes) in a Skoda Octavia and measures 720 × 480 mm. The goal of the study is to compare the functionality and performance parameters of both radiators based on the results of tests in a calibrated air wind tunnel. During testing, both heat exchangers were tested in conventional conditions used for car radiators with different air flow and coolant (50% ethylene glycol) rates. The polymeric hollow fiber heat exchanger demonstrated about 20% higher thermal performance for the same air flow. The efficiency of the polymeric radiator was in the range 80–93% and the efficiency of the aluminum radiator was in the range 64–84%. The polymeric radiator is 30% lighter than its conventional metal competitor. Both tested radiators had very similar pressure loss on the liquid side, but the polymeric radiator featured higher air pressure loss.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xinyi Xiao ◽  
Byeong-Min Roh

Abstract The integration of Topology optimization (TO) and Generative Design (GD) with additive manufacturing (AM) is becoming advent methods to lightweight parts while maintaining performance under the same loading conditions. However, these models from TO or GD are not in a form that they can be easily edited in a 3D CAD modeling system. These geometries are generally in a form with no surface/plane information, thus having non-editable features. Direct fabricate these non-feature-based designs and their inherent characteristics would lead to non-desired part qualities in terms of shape, GD&T, and mechanical properties. Current commercial software always requires a significant amount of manual work by experienced CAD users to generate a feature-based CAD model from non-feature-based designs for AM and performance simulation. This paper presents fully automated shaping algorithms for building parametric feature-based 3D models from non-feature-based designs for AM. Starting from automatically decomposing the given geometry into “formable” volumes, which is defined as a sweeping feature in the CAD modeling system, each decomposed volume will be described with 2D profiles and sweeping directions for modeling. The Boolean of modeled components will be the final parametric shape. The volumetric difference between the final parametric form and the original geometry is also provided to prove the effectiveness and efficiency of this automatic shaping methodology. Besides, the performance of the parametric models is being simulated to testify the functionality.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document