Genetic diversity and population structure of the mangrove lime (Merope angulata) in India revealed by AFLP and ISSR markers

2015 ◽  
Vol 120 ◽  
pp. 260-267 ◽  
Author(s):  
Satya Narayan Jena ◽  
Sushma Verma ◽  
Kuttan Narayanan Nair ◽  
Awadhesh Kumar Srivastava ◽  
Sujata Misra ◽  
...  
2014 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 6340-6349 ◽  
Author(s):  
D.X. Chen ◽  
L.Y. Li ◽  
X. Zhang ◽  
Y. Wang ◽  
Z. Zhang

2013 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. 362-369 ◽  
Author(s):  
Man Jung Kang ◽  
Suresh Sundan ◽  
Gi An Lee ◽  
Ho Cheol Ko ◽  
Jong Wook Chung ◽  
...  

ZooKeys ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 941 ◽  
pp. 49-69
Author(s):  
Diana Ortíz-Gamino ◽  
Josefat Gregorio ◽  
Luis Cunha ◽  
Esperanza Martínez-Romero ◽  
Carlos Fragoso ◽  
...  

Pontoscolex corethrurus (Müller, 1857) is an invasive tropical earthworm, globally distributed. It reproduces through parthenogenesis, which theoretically results in low genetic diversity. The analysis of the population structure of P. corethrurus using molecular markers may significantly contribute to understanding the ecology and reproductive system of this earthworm species. This work assessed the genetic diversity and population structure of P. corethrurus with 34 polymorphic inter simple sequence repeat markers, covering four populations in tropical and temperate pastures from Veracruz State. Nuclear markers distinguished two genetic clusters, probably corresponding to two distinct genetic lineages. The number of clones detected in the AC population was lower than expected for a parthenogenetic species. Also, the apparent lack of differences in population structures related to the geographic region among the populations studied may indicate that human-mediated transference is prevalent in these areas. Still, most individuals apparently belong to lineage A, and only a few individuals seem to belong to the lineage B. Thus, the admixture signatures found among the four populations of P. corethrurus may have facilitated a successful invasion by directly increasing fitness. In summary, addressing the genetic variation of P. corethrurus with ISSR markers was a suitable approach, as it evidenced the genetic diversity and relationships in the populations evaluated.


2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (3) ◽  
pp. 204-213 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lin Yan ◽  
Collins Ogutu ◽  
Lifang Huang ◽  
Xiaoyang Wang ◽  
Hua Zhou ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Atefeh Nouri ◽  
Maryam Golabadi ◽  
Alireza Etminan ◽  
Abdolmajid Rezaei ◽  
Ali Ashraf Mehrabi

Abstract Aegilops tauschii, the diploid progenitor of the wheat D-genome, is a valuable genetic resource for wheat breeders. In this study, we compared the efficiency of inter-simple sequence repeat (ISSR) (as an arbitrary technique) and start codon targeted (SCoT) (as a gene-targeting technique) markers in determining the genetic diversity and population structure of 90 accessions of Ae. tauschii. SCoT markers indicated the highest values for polymorphism information content, marker index and effective multiplex ratio compared to ISSR markers. The total genetic diversity (Ht) and genetic diversity within populations (Hs) parameters were comparably modest for the two marker systems. The results of the analysis of molecular variance showed that the genetic variation within populations was significantly higher than among them (ISSR: 92 versus 8%; SCoT: 88 versus 12%). Furthermore, SCoT markers discovered a high level of genetic differentiation among populations than ISSRs (0.19 versus 0.05), while the amount of gene flow detected by ISSR was higher than SCoT (2.13 versus 8.62). Cluster analysis and population structure of SCoT and ISSR data divided all investigated accessions into two and four main clusters, respectively. Our results revealed that SCoT and ISSR fingerprinting could be used to further molecular analysis in Ae. tauschii and other wild species. The high-genetic variability found in this study also indicates the valuable genetic potential present in the investigated Ae. tauschii germplasm, which could be utilized for future genetic analysis and linkage mapping in breeding programmes.


Biologia ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 76 (2) ◽  
pp. 441-451
Author(s):  
Fatemeh Kazemeini ◽  
Younes Asri ◽  
Golaleh Mostafavi ◽  
Ramezan Kalvandi ◽  
Iraj Mehregan

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document