Genotype×environment interaction for growth traits of Nile tilapia in biofloc technology, recirculating water and Cage systems

Aquaculture ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 460 ◽  
pp. 98-104 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eduardo Maldonado Turra ◽  
Fabio Luiz Buranelo Toral ◽  
Érika Ramos de Alvarenga ◽  
Fernanda Santos Silva Raidan ◽  
Arthur Francisco de Araújo Fernandes ◽  
...  
Aquaculture ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 501 ◽  
pp. 104-110 ◽  
Author(s):  
Witsanu Srimai ◽  
Skorn Koonawootrittriron ◽  
Wiroon Manee-aphai ◽  
Satid Chatchaiphan ◽  
Urai Koolboon ◽  
...  

1987 ◽  
Vol 67 (2) ◽  
pp. 359-370 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. W. RAHNEFELD ◽  
R. M. McKAY ◽  
H. T. FREDEEN ◽  
G. M. WEISS ◽  
J. A. NEWMAN ◽  
...  

The effects of pretest and genotype × environment (GE) interactions of 137 reciprocal backcross bulls produced under two contrasting environments (Brandon, Manitoba and Manyberries, Alberta) were evaluated for postweaning performance traits. Differences in weaning weight and average daily gain during the pretest periods defined as preweaning (ADGBW), weaning to on-test (ADGWT), and birth to on-test (ADGBT) associated with the fixed effects of station of origin, breed cross and station of origin by test were not significant. Station of test effects were significant (P = 0.0001) for ADGWT and ADGBT. None of the GE interactions involving the station of origin was significant (P > 0.10) for the postweaning growth traits and probabilities exceeded 0.20 for all but three of the 40 traits. The GE interactions involving station of test were nonsignificant (P > 0.20) for all but eight traits. All of these exceptions involved the cumulative average daily gain in the eight periods which excluded the first 14 d of test. Although the GE interaction for average daily gain for 140 d of test was not significant there were substantial breed cross differences in growth rates at the two test locations. Users of performance test results, however, are generally concerned with absolute performance values, not statistically significant differences. Viewed in this context, the differential responses of genotypes under different test environments, even though statistically nonsignificant, could have important implications to the industry. Key words: Cattle, postweaning growth, genotype × environment interaction


2020 ◽  
Vol 61 (4) ◽  
pp. 575-580
Author(s):  
Filipe Chagas Teodózio de Araújo ◽  
Carlos Antonio Lopes de Oliveira ◽  
Eric Costa Campos ◽  
Grazyella Massako Yoshida ◽  
Vanessa Lewandowski ◽  
...  

2001 ◽  
Vol 31 (10) ◽  
pp. 1826-1836 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bo Karlsson ◽  
Hubert Wellendorf ◽  
Hans Roulund ◽  
Martin Werner

In 1997, eleven combined Picea abies (L.) Karst. provenance and clone trials were assessed in two series, with identical genetic constitution and design, in locations ranging from western Denmark to central Sweden, after 14 and 11 years, respectively. The phenotypic variation was larger for mixtures of 24 clones than for seedlings in one series, although 10 times more genotypes were represented amongst the seedlings. This was explained by random C-effects due to propagation. Provenances of seedlings and clone mixtures were fairly stable across sites. Statistically significant clone × trial interaction of growth traits were of the same magnitude as the clonal effects. The median genotypic correlation across sites for total height growth was 0.54. Ecovalence values for growth indicated that most clones contributed about equally to the interaction, with a tendency for clones with early bud break to give a larger contribution. Damage caused by late spring frost was assumed to be a main cause of genotype × environment interaction. Since interactions relatively were more pronounced for growth increment than for the latest height, the interaction seems to increase with age. Cluster analysis based on genotypic correlations between pairs of trials gave a very scattered geographic pattern of the test sites. The results did not justify any suggestions for changes in the P. abies breeding strategy.


2002 ◽  
Vol 32 (6) ◽  
pp. 1025-1038 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryan A Atwood ◽  
Timothy L White ◽  
Dudley A Huber

One hundred and thirteen open-pollinated families from Florida source loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) were tested in four states in the southeastern United States. Heritabilities and genetic correlations were estimated for volume, specific gravity, and latewood percentage at three different growth stages: juvenile (ages 0–10 years), mature (11–17 years), and total (0–17 years). Heritabilities of growth traits (0.09–0.11) were consistently lower than for wood property traits (0.16–0.33). Growth traits for Florida loblolly exhibited high genotype × environment interaction (rB = 0.44), whereas wood properties did not (rB = 0.90). The higher heritabilities and genetic stability across environments make wood properties amenable to genetic manipulation through breeding programs. In contrast, the high genotype × environment interaction of growth traits for Florida loblolly pine requires more research to understand the possible implication of these effects on breeding programs. Trait–trait and age–age genetic correlations were determined for growth and wood properties. Strong positive age–age correlations were present for latewood percentage, volume, and specific gravity. Weak negative trait–trait genetic correlations existed between specific gravity and volume across ages (–0.13 to –0.43). No genetic correlation existed between latewood percentage and volume, while a moderate favorable genetic correlation existed between latewood percentage and specific gravity (0.47 to 0.59). Genetic gains in volume and specific gravity were compared for various types of selection. In one type, forward selection of the top 20 individuals (of 3484) based on 17-year volume, resulted in a 20.5% genetic gain in volume; however, a concomitant loss of –6.4% also occurred in specific gravity. If a selection index was used to hold specific gravity constant, a gain in total volume of 14% was obtained.


1972 ◽  
Vol 35 (2) ◽  
pp. 317-320 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. B. Burnside ◽  
T. R. Batra ◽  
G. K. Macleod ◽  
D. G. Grieve

1973 ◽  
Vol 36 (3) ◽  
pp. 471-475 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. R. Batra ◽  
W. R. Usborne ◽  
D. G. Grieve ◽  
E. B. Burnside

2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 56-64
Author(s):  
Irina Manukyan ◽  
◽  
Madina Basieva ◽  
Elena Miroshnikova ◽  
◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document