Hip Arthroplasty Malpractice Claims in the Netherlands: Closed Claim Study 2000-2012

2016 ◽  
Vol 31 (9) ◽  
pp. 1890-1893.e4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Imme Zengerink ◽  
Max Reijman ◽  
Nina M.C. Mathijssen ◽  
Manon P. Eikens-Jansen ◽  
P. Koen Bos
2019 ◽  
Vol 30 (4) ◽  
pp. 423-430 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wout Füssenich ◽  
Davey MJM Gerhardt ◽  
Thomas Pauly ◽  
Frank Lorenz ◽  
Martin Olieslagers ◽  
...  

Background: Treatment and rehabilitation protocol for hip arthroplasty differs between Germany and the Netherlands. The Dutch system promotes fast-track surgery whereas in Germany conventional care is provided with a longer hospital stay including rehabilitation. Clinical outcome, patient satisfaction and costs in both treatment protocols were compared in a prospective setup. Material and methods: This prospective cohort study included patients allocated for primary THA in 3 German and 1 Dutch hospital in the border region. Patient-reported outcome scores (PROMS) were measured pre- and postoperatively at 6 and 12 months including the Oxford Hip Score, SF12 survey, visual analogue scale for satisfaction and pain. Length of hospitalisation and availability of postoperative rehabilitation were recorded. In addition, a total cost estimation was calculated using health insurers data. Results: A total of 360 consecutive patients were included; 175 THA in Germany compared to 185 THA in the Netherlands. No cross-border healthcare was encountered in both cohorts. Mean length of hospitalisation was 11.3 (range 6–23) days in Germany, compared to 4.4 (range 3–25) days in the Netherlands. In Germany 92% of the patients was discharged with inpatient (72%) or outpatient (20%) rehabilitation, compared to 21% with only inpatient rehabilitation in the Netherlands. No significant differences were measured regarding the PROMS and patient satisfaction between both countries. Due to profound differences in health care financing only a global cost estimation could be made and no major differences were encountered. Conclusion: Germany and the Netherlands both offer highly protocolled care for THA with comparable functional outcome and patient satisfaction with treatment after 12 months. Despite the length of hospitalisation in Germany is significantly longer including a more intensive rehabilitation programme, no significant differences were recorded regarding functional outcome nor patient satisfaction compared to fast-track surgery performed in the Netherlands.


2004 ◽  
Vol 11 (5) ◽  
pp. 247-250 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jolande Elshove-Bolk ◽  
Maarten Simons ◽  
Jan Cremers ◽  
Arie van Vugt ◽  
Michael Burg

2008 ◽  
Vol 29 (12) ◽  
pp. 1132-1138 ◽  
Author(s):  
Judith Manniën ◽  
Susan van den Hof ◽  
Jan Muilwijk ◽  
Peterhans J. van den Broek ◽  
Birgit van Benthem ◽  
...  

Objective.To evaluate the time trend in the surgical site infection (SSI) rate in relation to the duration of surveillance in The Netherlands.Setting.Forty-two hospitals that participated in the the Dutch national nosocomial surveillance network, which is known as PREZIES (Preventie van Ziekenhuisinfecties door Surveillance), and that registered at least 1 of the following 5 frequently performed surgical procedures for at least 3 years during the period from 1996 through 2006: mastectomy, colectomy, replacement of the head of the femur, total hip arthroplasty, or knee arthroplasty.Methods.Analyses were performed for each surgical procedure. The surveillance time to operation was stratified in consecutive 1-year periods, with the first year as reference. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed using a random coefficient model to adjust for random variation among hospitals. All models were adjusted for method of postdischarge surveillance.Results.The number of procedures varied from 3,031 for colectomy to 31,407 for total hip arthroplasty, and the SSI rate varied from 1.6% for knee arthroplasty to 12.2% for colectomy. For total hip arthroplasty, the SSI rate decreased significantly by 6% per year of surveillance (odds ratio [OR], 0.94 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 0.90–0.98]), indicating a 60% decrease after 10 years. Nonsignificant but substantial decreasing trends in the rate of SSI were found for replacement of the head of the femur (OR, 0.94 [95% CI, 0.88–1.00]) and for colectomy (OR, 0.92 [95% CI, 0.83–1.02]).Conclusions.Even though most decreasing trends in the SSI rate were not statistically significant, they were encouraging. To use limited resources as efficiently as possible, we would suggest switching the surveillance to another surgical procedure when the SSI rate for that particular procedure has decreased below the target rate.


2010 ◽  
Vol 35 (5) ◽  
pp. 381-384 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Mahdavian Delavary ◽  
J.E.L. Cremers ◽  
M.J.P.F. Ritt

We analysed hand and wrist injury and disorder related liability claims in the Netherlands to identify causes and to contribute to the prevention of such claims. Data was collected from 743 hand and wrist claims filed between 1993 and 2007. Consultants were involved in 417 claims (56.1%). Treatment in the emergency department (ED) accounted for 64.9% of these 287 claims involved residents (59.5%). The majority of accepted claims in the ED included treatment by general surgeons (89.2%). The percentage of accepted claims was highest in the general surgery group (26.4%). Of accepted claims in the ED which involved a resident, 93.2% involved a general surgery resident. Better training and supervision is indicated. This paper supports hand injury treatment by adequately trained surgeons and preferably, where possible, by a trained hand surgeon.


2012 ◽  
Vol 131 (6) ◽  
pp. 1360-1366 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vivian van Breest Smallenburg ◽  
Wikke Setz-Pels ◽  
Johanna H. Groenewoud ◽  
Adri C. Voogd ◽  
Frits H. Jansen ◽  
...  

BMJ Open ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (8) ◽  
pp. e016020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gesine H Seeber ◽  
Annet Wijnen ◽  
Djordje Lazovic ◽  
Sjoerd K Bulstra ◽  
Günter Dietz ◽  
...  

IntroductionOsteoarthritis is the most common joint disorder worldwide. Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is considered one of the most effective treatments for end-stage hip osteoarthritis. The number of THAs is expected to increase dramatically in the coming decades. Usual postoperative rehabilitation after primary THA differs between the German and the Dutch system. In the Netherlands, patients undergo fast-track surgery and are discharged into their home environment within a few days without receiving any aftercare. In Germany, patients stay in the hospital for about 12 days before being transferred to a rehabilitation centre for a period of 3 weeks. The superficially more cost-effective Dutch system of usual care after THA is judged critically in both countries due to suboptimal rehabilitation outcomes. The aim of this study is therefore to compare the Dutch with the German usual care rehabilitation after primary THA. It is hypothesised that the German procedure is more effective in terms of functional outcomes and patient satisfaction than the Dutch procedure and that in the long run the German approach is more cost-effective than the Dutch system.Methods and analysisMedical effectiveness will be assessed at four different time points by means of patient self-reported questionnaires and functional tests. Assessments include the Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, Patient Acceptable Symptom State, Short Form 36, EuroQol 5 Dimensions 3 Level Questionnaire, Timed Up & Go Test and Five Times Sit-to-Stand Test. Additionally, long-term economic aspects in both countries will be assessed from a societal perspective, to get a first impression on whether cutting costs for rehabilitation, as practised in the Netherlands, really disburdens the healthcare system efficiently.Ethics and disseminationThe study is approved by the Institutional Review Boards of both University Medical Center Groningen (METc2015/483) and Hannover Medical School (no 2874-2015) and will be conducted according to the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki (64th, 2013). The results of the study will be published in international peer-reviewed scientific journals. Patient data will be presented anonymously in any publication or scientific journal.Trial registration numberDRKS00011345; Pre-results.


2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (5) ◽  
pp. 350-355 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luuk Wansink ◽  
Maybritt I. Kuypers ◽  
Tom Boeije ◽  
Crispijn L. van den brand ◽  
Manon de Waal ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 112070002110200
Author(s):  
Martijn FL Kuijpers ◽  
Gerjon Hannink ◽  
Liza N van Steenbergen ◽  
B Wim Schreurs

Background: Worldwide, the majority of total hip arthroplasties (THAs) placed in patients <55 years are uncemented. However, little is known about the preferred method of fixation in revision hip arthroplasty in young patients. The aim of this study was to assess potential differences in the method of fixation used between primary and revision THA in young patients using data from the Dutch Arthroplasty Register. Methods: All primary THA placed in patients younger than 55 years, registered in the LROI between 2007 and 2019 were included n = 28,516). Kaplan-Meier survival analyses were used to estimate the survival of primary THA by method of fixation. Additionally, survival of revision procedures that changed or did not change in method of fixation were estimated. McNemar’s test was used to assess differences in the proportion of cemented and uncemented fixation between primary and revision THA. Results: In all acetabular revisions, the use of cemented fixation increased statistically significant with 39% (95% CI, 34–45, p < 0.001) from 23% in primary THA to 62% in revision procedures. In all femoral revisions, the increase of cemented fixation was also statistically significant with 25% (95% CI, 19–31, p < 0.001), from 11% in primary THA to 36% in revision surgery. For both revised acetabular and femoral components, we found no statistically significant difference in the 5-year survival between revision procedures that changed or did not change in method of fixation. Conclusions: There was a significant change towards cemented fixation between primary and revision THA in young patients in the Netherlands, which was especially pronounced in acetabular revisions. No significant difference in short-term survival was found between revision procedures that changed or did not change in method of fixation. Long-term follow-up data are needed to evaluate the effect of this change in fixation method on the outcome of revision procedures in young patients.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document