Effect of Medial Soft Tissue Releases During Posterior-Stabilized Total Knee Arthroplasty on Contact Kinematics and Patient-Reported Outcomes

2019 ◽  
Vol 34 (6) ◽  
pp. 1110-1115 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mina W. Morcos ◽  
Brent A. Lanting ◽  
Jared Webster ◽  
James L. Howard ◽  
Dianne Bryant ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Posterior Stabilized ◽  
Contact Kinematics ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Total Knee

The Effect of Implant Design on Sagittal Plane Stability: A Randomized Trial of Medial- versus Posterior-Stabilized Total Knee Arthroplasty

2019 ◽  
Vol 33 (05) ◽  
pp. 452-458 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adam I. Edelstein ◽  
Surabhi Bhatt ◽  
Josh Wright-Chisem ◽  
Ryan Sullivan ◽  
Matt Beal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Sagittal Plane ◽  
Oxford Knee Score ◽  
Implant Design ◽  
Posterior Stabilized ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Total Knee ◽  
The Impact

AbstractUp to 20% of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) patients report dissatisfaction with their outcome, especially with weight-bearing in flexion (WBiF) activities. Sagittal plane instability may contribute to dissatisfaction following TKA. We assessed the impact of implant design on TKA sagittal plane stability and clinical satisfaction. We randomized patients to receive one of two TKA implant designs: medial-stabilized (MS) or posterior-stabilized (PS). Sagittal stability was assessed using a KT-1000 arthrometer. Patient-reported outcome measures, including a custom bank of questions targeting patient satisfaction (0–100%) with WBiF activities, were administered to patients 2 years following surgery. The final analysis included 50 patients (25 MS, 25 PS). The MS group had greater sagittal plane stability than the PS group at 30-degree flexion (5.6 ± 1.9 vs. 10.2 ± 2.7 mm; p < 0.0001) but not at 90-degree flexion (4.1 ± 2 vs. 5.3 ± 3 mm; p = 0.14). Range of motion was not different (111.3 ± 10.4 vs. 114.7 ± 10.7 degrees; p = 0.31). There were no differences in the PROMIS (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) score, Oxford Knee Score, Knee Society Score, Forgotten Joint Score, or Veterans Rand. The MS group had no difference in satisfaction for WBiF activities versus non-WBiF activities (80.5 ± 18 vs. 88.3% ± 16.4%; p = 0.13), whereas the PS group had significantly worse satisfaction for WBiF versus non-WBiF activities (71.6 ± 24.6 vs. 87.8% ± 16.6%; p = 0.019). An MS prosthetic design was more stable in the sagittal plane in midflexion compared with a PS design. There was no difference in patient-reported outcomes, although custom survey data suggest improved satisfaction with MS design during WBiF activities.

scholarly journals Does soft tissue balancing using intraoperative pressure sensors improve clinical outcomes in total knee arthroplasty? A protocol of a multicentre randomised controlled trial

BMJ Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (5) ◽  
pp. e027812 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samuel J MacDessi ◽  
Aziz Bhimani ◽  
Alexander W R Burns ◽  
Darren B Chen ◽  
Anthony K L Leong ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Randomised Controlled Trial ◽  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Additional Patient ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Total Knee ◽  
Randomised Controlled

IntroductionSoft tissue imbalance is considered to be a major surgical cause of dissatisfaction following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Surgeon-determined manual assessment of ligament tension has been shown to be a poor determinant of the true knee balance state. The recent introduction of intraoperative sensors, however, allows surgeons to precisely quantify knee compartment pressures and tibiofemoral kinematics, thereby optimising coronal and sagittal plane soft tissue balance. The primary hypothesis of this study is that achieving knee balance with use of sensors in TKA will improve patient-reported outcomes when compared with manual balancing.Methods and analysisA multicentred, randomised controlled trial will compare patient-reported outcomes in 222 patients undergoing TKA using sensor-guided balancing versus manual balancing. The sensor will be used in both arms for purposes of data collection; however, surgeons will be blinded to the pressure data in patients randomised to manual balancing. The primary outcome will be the change from baseline to 1 year postoperatively in the mean of the four subscales of the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS4) that are most specific to TKA recovery: pain, symptoms, function and knee-related quality of life. Secondary outcomes will include the surgeon’s capacity to determine knee balance, radiographic and functional measures and additional patient-reported outcomes. Normality of data will be assessed, and a Student’s t-test and equivalent non-parametric tests will be used to compare differences in means among the two groups.Ethics and disseminationEthics approval was obtained from South Eastern Sydney Local Health District, Approval (HREC/18/POWH/320). Results of the trial will be presented at orthopaedic surgical meetings and submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal.Trial registration numberACTRN#12618000817246

scholarly journals Impact of Preoperative Opioid Use on Patient-Reported Outcomes after Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Propensity Matched Analysis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eitan Ingall ◽  
Christian Klemt ◽  
Christopher M. Melnic ◽  
Wayne B. Cohen-Levy ◽  
Venkatsaiakhil Tirumala ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Propensity Score ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Opioid Use ◽  
Absolute Increase ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Total Knee ◽  
Opioid Users ◽  
Revision Tka

AbstractThis is a retrospective study. Prior studies have characterized the deleterious effects of narcotic use in patients undergoing primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). While there is an increasing revision arthroplasty burden, data on the effect of narcotic use in the revision surgery setting remain limited. Our aim was to characterize the effect of active narcotic use at the time of revision TKA on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). A total of 330 consecutive patients who underwent revision TKA and completed both pre- and postoperative PROMs was identified. Due to differences in baseline characteristics, 99 opioid users were matched to 198 nonusers using the nearest-neighbor propensity score matching. Pre- and postoperative knee disability and osteoarthritis outcome score physical function (KOOS-PS), patient reported outcomes measurement information system short form (PROMIS SF) physical, PROMIS SF mental, and physical SF 10A scores were evaluated. Opioid use was identified by the medication reconciliation on the day of surgery. Propensity score–matched opioid users had significantly lower preoperative PROMs than the nonuser for KOOS-PS (45.2 vs. 53.8, p < 0.01), PROMIS SF physical (37.2 vs. 42.5, p < 0.01), PROMIS SF mental (44.2 vs. 51.3, p < 0.01), and physical SF 10A (34.1 vs. 36.8, p < 0.01). Postoperatively, opioid-users demonstrated significantly lower scores across all PROMs: KOOS-PS (59.2 vs. 67.2, p < 0.001), PROMIS SF physical (43.2 vs. 52.4, p < 0.001), PROMIS SF mental (47.5 vs. 58.9, p < 0.001), and physical SF 10A (40.5 vs. 49.4, p < 0.001). Propensity score–matched opioid-users demonstrated a significantly smaller absolute increase in scores for PROMIS SF Physical (p = 0.03) and Physical SF 10A (p < 0.01), as well as an increased hospital length of stay (p = 0.04). Patients who are actively taking opioids at the time of revision TKA report significantly lower preoperative and postoperative outcome scores. These patients are more likely to have longer hospital stays. The apparent negative effect on patient reported outcomes after revision TKA provides clinically useful data for surgeons in engaging patients in a preoperative counseling regarding narcotic use prior to revision TKA to optimize outcomes.

scholarly journals Correction to: Robotic‑arm assisted total knee arthroplasty is associated with improved accuracy and patient reported outcomes: a systematic review and meta‑analysis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Junren Zhang ◽  
Wofhatwa Solomon Ndou ◽  
Nathan Ng ◽  
Paul Gaston ◽  
Philip M. Simpson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Robotic Arm ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Total Knee ◽  
Improved Accuracy

A correction to this paper has been published: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-021-06522-x

A Prospective Randomised Control Trial Comparing Functional with Mechanical Axis Alignment in Total Knee Arthroplasty: study protocol for an investigator initiated trial

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard Steer ◽  
Beth Tippett ◽  
R Nazim Khan ◽  
Dermot Collopy ◽  
Gavin Clark
Keyword(s):  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Functional Outcomes ◽  
Medical Information ◽  
Randomised Control Trial ◽  
Computer Assisted ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Total Knee ◽  
Alternative Alignment

Abstract Background: A drive to improve functional outcomes for patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has led to alternative alignment being used. Functional alignment (FA) uses intraoperative soft tissue tension to determine the optimal position of the prosthesis within the patients soft tissue envelope. Angular limits for bone resections are followed to prevent long term prosthesis failure. This study will use the aid of robotic assistance to plan and implement the final prosthesis position. This method has yet to be compared to the traditional mechanically aligned (MA) knee in a randomised trial. Methods: A blinded randomised control trial with 100 patients will be undertaken via Perth Hip and Knee clinic. Fifty patients will undergo a MA TKA and fifty will undergo a FA TKA. Both alignment techniques will be balanced via computer assisted navigation to assess prosthetic gaps, being achieved via the initial bony resection and further soft tissue releases as required to achieve satisfactory balance. The primary outcome will be the forgotten joint score (FJS) two years after surgery, with secondary outcomes being other patient reported outcome measures, clinical functional assessment, radiographic position and complications. Other data that will be collected will be patient demography (Sex, Age, level of activity) and medical information (grade of knee injury, any other relevant medical information). The linear statistical model will be fitted to the response (FJS), including all the other variables as covariates. Discussion: Many surgeons are utilising alternative alignment techniques with a goal of achieving better functional outcomes for their patients. Currently MA TKA remains the gold standard with good outcomes and excellent longevity. There is no published RCTs comparing FA to MA yet and only two registered studies are planned or currently in progress. This study utilizes a FA technique which differs from the two studies. This study will help determine if FA TKA has superior functional results for patients.Trial registration: This trial has been registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR) http://www.anzctr.org.au: U1111-1257-2291, registered 25th Jan 2021. It is also listed on www.clinicaltrials.gov: NCT04748510

No differences in patient-reported outcomes between medial pivot insert and symmetrical insert in total knee arthroplasty: A randomized analysis

The Knee ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 25 (6) ◽  
pp. 1254-1261 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kohei Nishitani ◽  
Moritoshi Furu ◽  
Shinichiro Nakamura ◽  
Shinichi Kuriyama ◽  
Masahiro Ishikawa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Medial Pivot ◽  
Total Knee

scholarly journals Bicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty (BKA) in comparison to unicompartmental (UKA), Patellofemoral (PFA) ans total knee arthroplasty (TKA) – Early Clinical Results

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (6_suppl4) ◽  
pp. 2325967119S0023
Author(s):  
Johannes Holz ◽  
Stefan Schneider ◽  
Ansgar Ilg ◽  
Rene Kaiser
Keyword(s):  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Total Knee Replacement ◽  
Knee Replacement ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Clinical Results ◽  
Single Center ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Total Knee ◽  
Bicompartmental Arthroplasty

Aims and Objectives: The purpose was to evaluate the clinical outcomes of patients with knee osteoarthritis treated with bicompartmental arthroplasty (BKA) in comparison to unicompartmental (UKA), patellofemoral (PFA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in a single center. Materials and Methods: This is a prospective study analyzing a consecutive series of 396 patients from two surgeons in a single center. In 191 men and 205 women either partial or total knee replacement were performed. Their mean age at surgery was 63±6,85 years and mean BMI 29,55±5,00 kg/m2. In 238 patients UKA, in 125 TKA, in 21 PFA and in 11 patients BKA was performed. Implants were cemented and made of cobalt chrome in partial knee and zirconium oxide in total knee replacement. Demographics and patient reported outcomes (VAS, KOOS, Oxford Knee Score (OKS)) were collected preoperatively and 3,6 and 12 months postoperatively. A total of 202 patients have thus far completed the 12 months follow-up time point. Results: All mean KOOS and OKS scores improved significantly 1 year after surgery (p<0.05). Mean preoperative aggregated KOOS improved from 49,0±14,1 to 74,3±17,8 in UKA, from 44,1±12,9 to 67,5±9,4 in PFA, from 46,1±15,1 to 71,0±14,8 in TKA and from 45,7±13,8 to 72,6±9,7 in BKA (p<0.05). Mean preoperative aggregated OKS improved from 25,1±7,6) to 38,5±9,7 in UKA, from 23,0±7,6 to 36,8±3,8 in PFA, from 23,4±8,2 to 37,3±8,1 in TKA and from 22,9±9,6 to 37,0±1,5 in BKA (p<0.05). The mean pain level (VAS)decreased from pre-treatment to 12 months after surgery in UKA from 5,5 to 1,6, in PFA from 6,1 to 2,5, in TKA from 6,0 to 1,9 and in BKA from 6,6 to 2,6. One patient (0.4%) underwent revision (at 3 month for inlay dislocation). Conclusion: This study shows excellent early clinical results of patients treated with unicompartmental, bicompartmental and total knee arthroplasty. Adherence to strict indications lead to a significant improvement of patient reported outcomes and a low revision rate one year postoperatively. The reported results for BKA are comparable to those of patients treated with unicompartmental arthroplasty. We conclude that bicompartmental arthroplasty is a safe and reliable surgery for patients with bicompartmental osteoarthritis.

scholarly journals No Difference in Recovery of Patient-Reported Outcome and Range of Motion between Cruciate Retaining and Posterior Stabilized Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial

2019 ◽  
Vol 33 (12) ◽  
pp. 1243-1250
Author(s):  
Lennard G. H. van den Boom ◽  
Reinoud W. Brouwer ◽  
Inge van den Akker-Scheek ◽  
Inge H. F. Reininga ◽  
Astrid J. de Vries ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Range Of Motion ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome ◽  
Secondary Outcome ◽  
P Value ◽  
Posterior Stabilized ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Total Knee

AbstractBoth from the perspective of the individual and from a socioeconomic point of view (e.g., return to work), it is important to have an insight into the potential differences in recovery between posterior cruciate ligament retaining (PCR) and posterior stabilized (PS) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) implants. The primary aim of this study was to compare the speed of recovery of patient-reported outcome between patients with a PCR and PS TKA during the first postoperative year. The secondary aim was to compare the effect on range of motion (ROM). In a randomized, double-blind, controlled, single-center trial, 120 adults diagnosed with osteoarthritis of the knee were randomized into either the PCR or PS group. Primary outcome was speed of recovery of patient-reported pain and function, measured with the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities osteoarthritis index (WOMAC), with a follow-up of 1 year. Main secondary outcome measure was ROM. A generalized estimating equations (GEE) analysis was used to assess whether there was a difference over time between groups (“p-value for interaction”). Between 2008 and 2011, 59 participants received a PCR TKA (mean age, 70.3 years [SD = 7.7]; mean body mass index [BMI], 30.5 kg/m2 [SD = 5.4]) and 55 participants a PS TKA (mean age, 73.5 years [SD = 7.0]; mean BMI, 29.2 kg/m2 [SD = 4.4]). Six patients (two PCR and four PS) were excluded because of early drop-out, so 114 patients (95%) were available for analysis. In between group difference for total WOMAC score was −1.3 (95% confidence interval [CI]: −5.6 to 3.1); p-value for interaction was 0.698. For ROM, in between group difference was 1.1 (95% CI: −2.6 to 4.7); p-value for interaction was 0.379. These results demonstrated that there are no differences in speed of recovery of WOMAC or ROM during the first postoperative year after PCR or PS TKA.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document