The antifungal plant defensin HsAFP1 induces autophagy, vacuolar dysfunction and cell cycle impairment in yeast

Maytansine, a novel ansa macrolide (1), has potent anti-tumor and antimitotic activity (2, 3). It blocks cell cycle traverse in mitosis with resultant accumulation of metaphase cells (4). Inhibition of brain tubulin polymerization in vitro by maytansine has also been reported (3). The C-mitotic effect of this drug is similar to that of the well known Vinca- alkaloids, vinblastine and vincristine. This study was carried out to examine the effects of maytansine on the cell cycle traverse and the fine struc- I ture of human lymphoblasts.Log-phase cultures of CCRF-CEM human lymphoblasts were exposed to maytansine concentrations from 10-6 M to 10-10 M for 18 hrs. Aliquots of cells were removed for cell cycle analysis by flow microfluorometry (FMF) (5) and also processed for transmission electron microscopy (TEM). FMF analysis of cells treated with 10-8 M maytansine showed a reduction in the number of G1 cells and a corresponding build-up of cells with G2/M DNA content.

Download Full-text

Fibronexus-Like Adhesion Sites are Present at the Invasive Zones of Human Epidermoid Carcinomas

Proceedings, annual meeting, Electron Microscopy Society of America ◽

10.1017/s0424820100053280 ◽

1982 ◽

Vol 40 ◽

pp. 106-109

Author(s):

Irwin I. Singer

Keyword(s):

Cell Cycle ◽

Serum Concentration ◽

Substrate Binding ◽

High Serum ◽

Adhesion Sites ◽

Substrate Adhesion ◽

Focal Contacts ◽

Adhesion Complex ◽

Low Serum

Our previous results indicate that two types of fibronectin-cytoskeletal associations may be formed at the fibroblast surface: dorsal matrixbinding fibronexuses generated in high serum (5% FBS) cultures, and ventral substrate-adhering units formed in low serum (0.3% FBS) cultures. The substrate-adhering fibronexus consists of at least vinculin (VN) and actin in its cytoplasmic leg, and fibronectin (FN) as one of its major extracellular components. This substrate-adhesion complex is localized in focal contacts, the sites of closest substratum approach visualized with interference reflection microscopy, which appear to be the major points of cell-tosubstrate adhesion. In fibroblasts, the latter substrate-binding complex is characteristic of cultures that are arrested at the G1 phase of the cell cycle due to the low serum concentration in their medium. These arrested fibroblasts are very well spread, flattened, and immobile.

Download Full-text

Immunocytochemical studies on the behavior of RuBisCO and LHCP II during the cell cycle of synchronized Euglena gracilis

Proceedings, annual meeting, Electron Microscopy Society of America ◽

10.1017/s0424820100160868 ◽

1990 ◽

Vol 48 (3) ◽

pp. 662-663

Author(s):

Tetsuaki Osafune ◽

Shuji Sumida ◽

Tomoko Ehara ◽

Eiji Hase ◽

Jerome A. Schiff

Keyword(s):

Cell Cycle ◽

Immunoelectron Microscopy ◽

Growth Phase ◽

Euglena Gracilis ◽

Dark Period ◽

Light Period ◽

Carboxylase Activity ◽

Immunocytochemical Studies ◽

Lhcp Ii

Changes in the morphology of pyrenoid and the distribution of RuBisCO in the chloroplast of Euglena gracilis were followed by immunoelectron microscopy during the cell cycle in a light (14 h)- dark (10 h) synchronized culture under photoautotrophic conditions. The imrnunoreactive proteins wereconcentrated in the pyrenoid, and less densely distributed in the stroma during the light period (growth phase, Fig. 1-2), but the pyrenoid disappeared during the dark period (division phase), and RuBisCO was dispersed throughout the stroma. Toward the end of the division phase, the pyrenoid began to form in the center of the stroma, and RuBisCO is again concentrated in that pyrenoid region. From a comparison of photosynthetic CO2-fixation with the total carboxylase activity of RuBisCO extracted from Euglena cells in the growth phase, it is suggested that the carboxylase in the pyrenoid functions in CO2-fixation in photosynthesis.

Download Full-text

Valproic acid eliminates quiescent cancer stem-like cells in pediatric GBMS by driving them into cell cycle and promoting radiation induced-DNA damages: anin vivostudy in orthotopic xenograft models

Cell Biology International ◽

10.1042/cbi034s040b ◽

2010 ◽

Vol 34 (8) ◽

pp. S40-S40

Author(s):

Zhigang Liu ◽

Yunfei Xia ◽

Xiao‑Nan Li

Keyword(s):

Cell Cycle ◽

Valproic Acid ◽

Dna Damages ◽

Orthotopic Xenograft ◽

Radiation Induced ◽

Xenograft Models

Download Full-text

Effect of Chrysanthemum flavonoids on growth and cell cycle regulators of gastric cancer cell

Cell Biology International ◽

10.1042/cbi034s050d ◽

2010 ◽

Vol 34 (8) ◽

pp. S50-S50

Author(s):

Xiaoyan Pan ◽

Xinmei Zhou ◽

Guangtao Xu ◽

Lingfen Miao ◽

Shuoru Zhu

Keyword(s):

Gastric Cancer ◽

Cell Cycle ◽

Cancer Cell ◽

Gastric Cancer Cell ◽

Cell Cycle Regulators

Download Full-text

Repair pathway choice for double-strand breaks

Essays in Biochemistry ◽

10.1042/ebc20200007 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 64 (5) ◽

pp. 765-777 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Yixi Xu ◽

Dongyi Xu

Keyword(s):

Cell Cycle ◽

Double Strand Breaks ◽

Homologous Region ◽

Gene Repair ◽

Repair Pathway ◽

Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽

Environmental Radiation ◽

Strand Breaks ◽

Dna End Resection ◽

End Resection

Abstract Deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) is at a constant risk of damage from endogenous substances, environmental radiation, and chemical stressors. DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) pose a significant threat to genomic integrity and cell survival. There are two major pathways for DSB repair: nonhomologous end-joining (NHEJ) and homologous recombination (HR). The extent of DNA end resection, which determines the length of the 3′ single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) overhang, is the primary factor that determines whether repair is carried out via NHEJ or HR. NHEJ, which does not require a 3′ ssDNA tail, occurs throughout the cell cycle. 53BP1 and the cofactors PTIP or RIF1-shieldin protect the broken DNA end, inhibit long-range end resection and thus promote NHEJ. In contrast, HR mainly occurs during the S/G2 phase and requires DNA end processing to create a 3′ tail that can invade a homologous region, ensuring faithful gene repair. BRCA1 and the cofactors CtIP, EXO1, BLM/DNA2, and the MRE11–RAD50–NBS1 (MRN) complex promote DNA end resection and thus HR. DNA resection is influenced by the cell cycle, the chromatin environment, and the complexity of the DNA end break. Herein, we summarize the key factors involved in repair pathway selection for DSBs and discuss recent related publications.

Download Full-text