scholarly journals 216: AMD 3100 successfully mobilizes autologous CD34+ cells after failure of G-CSF mobilization regimens with low toxicity and acceptable autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) outcomes

2007 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 79
Author(s):  
P.J. Shaughnessy ◽  
M. Hougham ◽  
C. Bachier ◽  
C.F. LeMaistre
2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6552-6552
Author(s):  
Sunita Nathan ◽  
John Joseph Maciejewski ◽  
Elizabeth Shima Rich ◽  
Parameswaran Venugopal ◽  
Kent W. Christopherson ◽  
...  

6552 Background: Plerixafor for mobilization of autologous stem cells (ASC) has increased the yield of transplanted ASC and is evolving as an important option for mobilization. A prior study reported a 10% incidence of SN after AHSCT (BMT 2009 Aug; 44(3): 175-83). Incidence and outcome of SN in the setting of Plerixafor/G-CSF (P/G), is unknown. We report the incidence and possible etiology for the development of SN in pts undergoing AHSCT for lymphoma at our institution. Methods: Data from 80 consecutive AHSCT pts over a 2 year period were reviewed. All pts were mobilized using P/G. Demographics, AHSCT indication, prior therapies (Rx), conditioning regimen (CR), engraftment and post-transplant complications were identified and collected. SN was defined as ANC <1000 after initial engraftment. Results: 80 pts underwent an AHSCT for lymphoma from 2009-11. 70 pts had evaluable data. 37 (52.86%) pts (average age 55.4 yrs) were male and 33 (47.14%) pts (average age 48.3 yrs) female. 25 (35.7%) pts had ≥2 comorbidities. Indications included relapsed/ refractory B-NHL, T-NHL and HL. 47 (67%) pts had Stage IV ds, 48.9% with BM involvement. 17 (24.3%) pts had >2 Rx, 18 (25.7%) with loco-regional XRT and 3 (4.3%) with RIT. CR included BEAM, BEC and Benda-EAM +/- Rituxan. # of CD34+ cells given ranged; 1.77-19.99 x 10^6/kg. Neutrophil engraftment occurred at a median of 11 days. 26 (37.14%) pts developed SN possibly from PCP prophylactic antibiotics and infections. Prior BM involvement, Rx or XRT had no role. 5 (45.4%) pts with Benda-EAM CR had SN. Associated morbidity/mortality were not noted. Conclusions: We conclude that secondary neutropenia is common after autologous stem cell transplant using the Plerixafor/GCSF combination for mobilization and is higher than reported in the literature (37% vs 10%). Patients who received this combination for mobilization should be followed up closely in the post-transplant period for secondary neutropenia. About half the patients who received the Benda-EAM conditioning regimen developed secondary neutropenia warranting its use with caution outside of a clinical trial.


Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 1995-1995
Author(s):  
Umberto Falcone ◽  
Shaheena Bashir ◽  
Khalil Al-Farsi ◽  
Laurie Watkins ◽  
C. Denise Turvey ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction: Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) often follows an aggressive course and remains incurable with standard therapies. First-line chemotherapy followed by consolidation with high-dose chemotherapy (HDT) and autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) has become a standard of care in eligible patients (pts). As relapse remains the main cause of treatment failure, strategies such as intensifying induction therapy with high-dose cytarabine or adding rituximab maintenance (RM) have been tested to reduce the relapse rate (RR) post-ASCT. We evaluated the effect of the addition of cytarabine and RM on the outcome of pts undergoing ASCT. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of consecutive MCL pts who underwent ASCT after first-line chemotherapy at the Princess Margaret Cancer Centre between 2000-2013. Pts received induction with CHOP, RCHOP, or RCHOP alternating with RDHAP (RCHOP/RDHAP), followed by HDT with or without total body irradiation (TBI). All pts had a documented response to induction using Cheson 1999 criteria. After ASCT, pts received maintenance with single-agent rituximab 375 mg/m2 or were simply observed. Results: 98 MCL pts were treated: median age was 56 years (36-66), 15 pts (15%) had blastoid or pleomorphic subtype, 85 pts (87%) had stage IV disease. MIPI was high risk in 18 pts (19%). Induction therapy: CHOP 14 pts (14%), RCHOP 57 (58%), and RCHOP/RDHAP 27 (28%). After induction CR was obtained in 44%, PR in 56% pts. CR rates were: CHOP 7 (50%), RCHOP 25 (44%), RCHOP/RDHAP 12 (44%) (P=ns). 89% pts had collected > 5*106 CD34/kg after RCHOP, and 78% after RCHOP/RDHAP (P=ns). Overall 66/98 pts (67%) had > 5*106 CD34/kg collected with 1 apheresis (Table 1). HDT was melphalan+etoposide for 63% pts, cytarabine+melphalan for 31% pts; 77 (79%) also received TBI. Median time from diagnosis to ASCT was 7.5 months (2.5, 33.4). Post-ASCT responses: CR 92 pts (94%), PR 4 (4%), 2 (2%) PD. Median time to ANC ≥0.5 were 10 days (CHOP), 11 days (RCHOP), and 11 days (RCHOP/RDHAP), while median days to PLT≥20 were 9 (CHOP), 11.5 (RCHOP), and 13 (RCHOP/RDHAP). Post-ASCT, 31% of pts had normal blood counts at 3 months which improved to 52% at 1 year post-ASCT. Maintenance data were available for 95/98 pts. RM was given to 72 pts (74%). Median follow-up from date of transplant for the entire cohort was 3.22 years (range 0.7 - 14.1). The 2-year and 5-year PFS were 85.8% (76.7-91.5) and 52.2% (37.7-64.7), respectively. 32 pts relapsed after ASCT (32.65%). Relapse occurred in 3 (11%) pts after RCHOP/RDHAP, 19 (33%) after RCHOP, and 10 (71%) after CHOP. Median time to relapse was 9 years (95%CI: 4.7-NR). 2-year and 5-year RR were 14.54% and 41.65%, respectively. Median OS was 9.15 years (95%CI: 7.3-NR), 2-year OS was 88.8% (80.2-93.8), and 5-year OS was 74.9% (61.7-84.2%). For patients observed without treatment post-ASCT, median PFS was 2.87 years (1.22-4.63) and median OS 5.19 years (1.66-NR), while for those receiving RM, PFS was 9.06 years (4.97-NR, p<0.001) and median OS has not yet been reached (7.30- NR, p=0.009). Conclusions: Response rate and PFS were similar between different induction regimens. The outcomes of responding pts following ASCT appear superior to previous strategies. Our patients enjoyed a very long PFS and median OS is surprisingly long as well. Within the limits of a retrospective study, our data support the use of rituximab maintenance, showing a significant benefit in both PFS and OS. Table 1. ASCT data Stem cell collection CHOP RCHOP RCHOP/RDHAP P value Pts collecting > 2x106 /Kg CD34+ cells in 1 day 4/14 (29%) 44/57 (77%) 17/27 (67%) 0.002 Pts collecting 2-5 x106 /Kg CD34+ cells N/A 6/57 (11%) 6/27 (22%) Pts collecting >5 x106 /Kg CD34+ cells N/A 51/57 (89%) 21/27 (78%) 0.153 Engraftment median (range) Days to ANC ≥ 0.5 10 (9,11) 11 (9, 12) 11 (9, 12) Pts with ANC ≥ 0.5 ≤ 11 days 13/13 (100%) 45/52 (87%) 21/25 (84%) 0.33 Days to PLT ≥ 20 9 (7, 15) 11.5 (9, 17) 13 (9, 26) Pts with PLT ≥ 20 ≤ 12 days 12/13 (92%) 37/52 (71%) 8/25 (32%) 0.0001* Days from ASCT to discharge 13 (11,26) 14 (11,30) 13 (11,23) PTs requiring RBC Transfusions 11 (79%) 43 (75%) 22 (81%) 0.821 Number of RBC Transfusions 2 (0, 4) 2 (0, 7) 3(0, 6) Pts requiring PLT Transfusions 12 (86%) 52 (93%) 25 (93%) 0.759 Number of PLT Transfusions 1 (0, 4) 2 (1, 9) 3 (1, 5) * comparison CHOP Vs R-CHOP: not significant, p=0.113 Legend. ASCT: autologous stem cell transplant; Pts: patients; ANC: absolute neutrophils count; PLTs: platelets; RBC: red blood cells. Disclosures Kuruvilla: Hoffmann LaRoche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria; Gilead: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Merck: Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Lundbeck: Honoraria; Karyopharm: Honoraria.


2020 ◽  
Vol 71 (4) ◽  
pp. 54-62
Author(s):  
Katarina Stančev ◽  
Milena Todorović-Balint

Introduction: High-dose chemotherapy by following autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) is a standard treatment of multiple myeloma (MM), relapse of Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL) and non-Hodgkin's lymphomas (NHL). Monitoring of clinical and biochemical characteristics, as well as post-transplant parameters, all point to the importance of mobilization potential. Aim: To evaluate the association of early recovery of neutrophil granulocytes ≥0.5 x 109 /L after 11 days of transplantation (ANC500_11), platelets ≥20 x 109 /L after 13 days of transplantation (PLT20_13) with gender, age, duration of mobilization, as well as radiotherapy or chemotherapy, dose CD34+ cells in the apheresis product and therapeutic response. Material and Methods: The retrospective study included 100 patients, out of which 51 patients with MM, 27 with NHL and 22 with HL, in the period from November 2015, ending December 2018. Results: The median age of the patient was 53(20-67) years. According to the DSS, 69% were in IIIA, while 12.5% of patients were in the IIIB clinical stage. According to the Ann-Arbor staging 92% patients were in the II or III clinical stage. The mediana number of CD34+ cells in the apheresis product was 6.7×106 /kgBM. The median in all three mobilization attempts was 6 days. Engraftment is most often detected during the 11th day. In 78% of patients, mobilization was successful in the first attempt (≥2.0x106 /kgBM) among which 86% were MM and 69,4% of lymphomas (p<0.05). The impacts of age, the number of CD34+ cells in the peripheral blood and the duration of the mobilization did not show a significant difference (p>0.05) in relation to the recovery of ANC500_11 and PLT20_13. Conclusion: Satisfactory CD34+ cellular yield can be provided in the first mobilization attempt in most of the patients using of GCS-F, while in the further mobilization attempts plerixafor was necessery. As opposed to gender, age, duration of mobilization and therapeutic response have no impact on ANC500_11 and PLT20_13.


Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 3218-3218
Author(s):  
Jennifer Tornatta ◽  
John J. Maciejewski ◽  
Sunita Nathan ◽  
Bruce C. McLeod ◽  
Darilyn Rhoades ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 3218 Poster Board III-155 Introduction In the phase 3 clinical trials of plerixafor plus G-CSF for SCM, plerixafor was administered at 10:00 pm on days prior to apheresis. This dosing schedule is based on the peak level of CD34+ cells in the peripheral blood (PB) at 11-14 hours after administration; however PB CD34+ cell levels were elevated from 4-18 hours after plerixafor administration. Due to inconvenience in dosing plerixafor at 10:00pm, we took advantage of its pharmacodynamic profile and explored an alternative dosing schedule, giving plerixafor at 5:00 pm. Here, we report our initial experience with the efficacy of this schedule. Patients and Methods Between 01/09 & 08/09, 22 candidates for autologous stem cell transplant (13 female; mean age = 59, range 32-69; 9 MM, 11 NHL & 2 HD) received plerixafor plus G-CSF for SCM. Eight (4 female) were previous mobilization failures; 3 had failed G-CSF alone and 5 had failed chemotherapy + G-CSF; 2 had failed >1 mobilization. At the time of mobilization, 6 patients (27%) were in CR and 16 (73%) were in PR. Eight patients (36%) had disease in the bone marrow, 7 of these had MM and 1 had NHL. Of the 9 MM patients 3 (33%) had previous lenalidomide therapy. Nine patients (41%) had received >2 different chemotherapy regimens prior to mobilization; 2 of these had failed traditional mobilization with either G-CSF or chemo + G-CSF. Seven patients (32%) had, had previous radiation therapy, of whom 2 had failed traditional mobilization. Our mobilization protocol for autologous SCM consisted of G-CSF 10mcg/kg given at daily at 6:00 am beginning on day 1 and plerixafor 0.24mg/kg SQ x1 (0.16mg/kg if creatine clearance < 50ml/min) given daily at 5:00 pm in our Outpatient Clinic beginning on day 4. Apheresis began at 8:30 a.m. on the morning of day 5. The minimum collection goal was 2 × 106 CD34+cells/kg per transplant while the maximum goal was 4 × 106CD34+cells/kg per transplant. SCM and apheresis were stopped after 1 collection if the maximum goal was reached or after the minimum goal was reached on any subsequent day. Results Administration of G-CSF plus 5:00 pm plerixafor resulted in a median PB CD34+ cell count in the morning of apheresis of 32.1 CD34+ cells/ml (range, 1.2-135.7). The median total apheresis yield was 4.83 × 106 CD34 cells/kg (range, 0.06-10.98 × 106) in a median of 2 days of apheresis (range, 1-4). Of the patients with multiple myeloma, 3/9 (33%) collected >6 × 106 CD34 cells/kg with a median time of 1.3 days, although per our protocol patients were stopped after 2 apheresis sessions if >4 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg had been collected. 2/22 patients (9%) failed a plerixafor mobilization. One of these had MM and had failed 2 previous traditional mobilization attempts; this patient reached the minimum collection goal after a second plerixafor mobilization attempt following a 3-week break. The other had received 4 previous chemotherapy regimens for NHL prior to mobilization. Nineteen patients (86%) had proceeded to transplant as of August 12th 2009, including the patient with a second plerixafor mobilization. The median days to neutrophils and platelet engraftment were 16 (range, 14-26) and 9 (range, 10-14) respectively. The side effect profile was similar to that described previously. Conclusion An alternative dosing SCM regimen giving at 5:00 pm allowed >90% of the patients to collect the minimum CD34+cell dose necessary to proceed to transplantation. This dosing schedule is more convenient and ensures 100% compliance with plerixafor dosing. Disclosures Tornatta: Genzyme: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Off Label Use: Plerxiafor is a chemokine recpeptor antagonist approved for use in pts with MM and NHL for mobilization of stem cells for autologous transplant. Our information includes patients with HD who were mobilized using plerxafor for stem cell mobilization and ultimately autologous stem cell transplantation. Fung:Genzyme: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau.


Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 2395-2395
Author(s):  
Francesco d'Amore ◽  
Maria Gomes da Silva ◽  
Sirpa Leppa ◽  
Antonio Pezzutto ◽  
Thomas Relander ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 2395 While already tested in T-PLL, the impact of chemo-immunotherapy with alemtuzumab in combination with bi-weekly CHOP on autologous stem cell harvest (ASCH) has not yet been analysed in the context of first line treatment of primary systemic peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL). We therefore evaluated the feasibility of ASCH in the first 23 patients of the ongoing international multicenter ACT-1 study, the first, and so far only, randomized trial in primary systemic PTCL. The ACT trials (ACT-1 + ACT-2) test the addition of alemtuzumab to CHOP followed, in younger patients (ACT-1), by high-dose therapy with autologous stem cell transplant (HDT+ASCT). The aims of the analysis were: (i) feasibility of ASCH in alemtuzumab + CHOP (A-CHOP) treated patients as compared to patients not receiving the antibody, but otherwise treated and managed in the same way, and (ii) comparison of ASCH counts in the two treatment arms. By July 2010, 20 patients, 11 in the standard treatment (arm A) and 9 in the experimental treatment (arm B) cohort, had undergone induction therapy and had been primed for subsequent ASCH according to local guidelines. Histological subtype distribution in the two treatment groups showed: PTCL not otherwise specified N=4 (arm A) and N=5 (arm B), angioimmunoblastic N=5 (arm A) and N=4 (arm B), extranodal NK/T-cell, nasal type N=1 (arm A), hepatosplenic N=1 (arm A). Pre-therapeutic evidence of bone marrow involvement was present in 4 (arm A) and 2 (arm B) patients, respectively. Of the original 23 patients, three did not undergo stem-cell harvest due to progressive disease (1 pt), patient's decision (1 pt), and pre-therapeutic CNS involvement (1 pt). Among the 20 harvested patients, ASCH failure was experienced in three patients (standard arm N=1 and experimental arm N=2; p=0.57). In two patients (one in each treatment cohort) a suboptimal stem cell yield could be optimized by the use of plerixafor according to local guidelines. A comparison of stem cell counts (CD34+ cells × 106/kg body weight) from the two treatment cohorts showed a trend towards moderately lower stem cell yields in alemtuzumab-treated patients (3.34 CD34+ cells × 106/kg body weight in arm B vs 6.54 CD34+ cells × 106/kg body weight in arm A, p=0.03). In conclusion, the addition of alemtuzumab to bi-weekly CHOP in the setting of first-line therapy of primary systemic PTCL does not significantly impair ASCH prior to upfront autologous stem cell transplant. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 4391-4391
Author(s):  
Asif Alavi ◽  
Rada Grubovic ◽  
Gary J. Schiller

Abstract Abstract 4391 Background: High dose chemotherapy followed by autologous transplantation of peripheral blood stem cells plays an important role in the management of intermediate- and advanced-stage multiple myeloma. In order for successful engraftment to occur, adequate numbers of high quality peripheral stem cells must be harvested prior to transplantation. Mobilization of PBSC in patients treated with lenalidomide has been associated with poor apheresis collections after G-CSF mobilization. The purpose of this study is to present our institution’s experience utilizing an intermediate-dose cyclophosphamide-based mobilization regimen. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed data for patients with multiple myeloma who underwent autologous stem cell transplant at UCLA between 2006 and 2010. Data were obtained from the database of the UCLA Heme Malignancy/Stem Cell Transplant Unit, the electronic health record system and stem cell processing laboratory. All patients underwent mobilization with a regimen of cyclophosphamide 2.5g/m2 IVPB, G-CSF 10 mcg/kg/day for 4 days SQ, and prednisone 2mg/kg/day for 4 days po. The number of CD 34+ cells was used as a marker for the number of peripheral stem cells collected. Minimum dose collected to ensure adequate engraftment was 2×106/kg CD34+ cells. Patients were conditioned with melphalan 100mg/m2/d x2 (unless there was evidence of renal failure, in which case the dose was reduced to 100mg/m2) with subsequent infusion of stem cells. Neutrophil engraftment was defined as the first day of absolute neutrophil count greater than 500×106/L ≥ 7 days after transplant. Results: Autologous stem cell transplant was performed in 103 patients with multiple myeloma at UCLA between 2006 and 2010. Median number of apheresis procedures was 1 (1–12) with a median of 4.4×106/kg (1.4–33.5) CD34+ cells collected. Median time to engraftment was 10 (8–18) days. Thirty-five patients received lenalidomide at some point in their pretransplant treatment. Median number of apheresis procedures was 1 in both lenalidomide and non lenalidomide treated groups. In the lenalidomide treated group 54% required only one collection versus 75% in the non lenalidomide treated group (p=0.033). In the lenalidomide treated group 31% required 3 more or more collections versus 10% in non lenalidomide treated group (p=0.0075). Three patients in the lenalidomide group had subsequent mobilization with plerixafor with one of these requiring bone marrow harvesting. Median CD34+ cells collected was 3.5×106/kg and 4.9×106/kg (p=0.246) in the lenalidomide and non-lenalidomide groups respectively. Both groups had a median time to neutrophil engraftment of 10 days with a similar range. Conclusion: Pre-transplant use of lenalidomide adversely affected the number of stem cell apheresis procedures required to procure adequate stem cell dose as evidenced by a greater percentage requiring 3 or more collections. However, despite prior lenalidomide exposure, the use of our mobilization regimen permitted adequate collection, with the majority of patients requiring only one apheresis procedure, and led to an equivalent time to neutrophil recovery. Disclosures: Off Label Use: Cyclophosphamide and G-CSF for mobilization of stem cells.


Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 4550-4550
Author(s):  
Kevin Wood ◽  
Sergio A Giralt ◽  
Guenther Koehne ◽  
David Chung ◽  
Nikoletta Lendvai ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 4550 Background: High dose therapy with autologous stem cell transplant (SCT) is an established therapeutic modality for multiple myeloma (MM). Although effective, it is associated with significant symptom burden due to the obligate period of neutropenia in addition to an increased risk of infectious complications. In animal models, infusing stem cells over a period of days enhances immune reconstitution (Felfly H, et al. Br J Haematol. 2009; 148: 646–658). We hypothesized that multiple stem cell infusions could reduce the period of neutropenia and enhance immune recovery resulting in a better tolerated procedure. Methods: We are conducting a phase II trial of multiple fractionated autologous stem cell infusions after high-dose Melphalan. We compared initial engraftment kinetics of the first 14 patients to receive multiple infusions (Days 0, +2, +4, +6) after high-dose Melphalan (study group) to 23 patients receiving high-dose Melphalan followed by the standard single stem cell infusion (Day 0) (standard group). Pegfilgrastim was given to all patients on Day +1. All patients underwent SCT between October 2011 and July 2012. Results: Results are shown in Table 1. Similar numbers of stem cells were collected in the study and standard groups. The total number of stem cells infused was 9.7 × 10∧6 CD34+ cells/kg in the study patients compared to 5.0 × 10∧6 CD34+ cells/kg in the standard patients. To date, the median duration of neutropenia (days of ANC < 500) and lymphopenia (days of ALC < 500) as well as the days to neutrophil, lymphocyte and platelet engraftment are similar. There are no significant differences in the number of red cell or platelet transfusions, days of fever, diarrhea, empiric antibiotics or documented infections. Despite receiving multiple infusions, none of the patients in the study group experienced an infusion reaction. Engraftment syndrome occurred in 3/14 (21%) of the study patients. The median duration of hospitalization was 15 days in the study cohort versus 17 days in the concurrent control group (P = 0.01). Conclusion: Multiple stem cell infusions following high dose Melphalan in patients with MM were not associated with a higher incidence of adverse side effects from DMSO nor unexpected frequency of engraftment syndrome. Fractionating stem cells over a period of days may result in less antibiotic use, reduced frequency of infection and was associated with shorter hospitalizations. We continue to collect patient reported symptom scores in order to determine if we can improve patient experience during SCT. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6549-6549
Author(s):  
Divaya Bhutani ◽  
Jeffrey A. Zonder ◽  
Judith Abrams ◽  
Voravit Ratanatharathorn ◽  
Joseph P. Uberti ◽  
...  

6549 Background: Autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) remains part of standard therapy for Multiple Myeloma (MM). Lenalidomide (LEN) is a newer, effective therapy for MM. It has been suggested that prior LEN therapy is associated with an increased risk of stem cell collection failure, particularly when only G-CSF is used for mobilization. Methods: We conducted a retrospective chart review of 310 consecutive MM pts who underwent pheresis to collect stem cells for first ASCT between July 1, 2007 and June 30, 2011 at the Karmanos Cancer Institute. We compared differences in quantity of CD34 cells collected, days needed to collect the target number of cells (> 2.5 x 10*6 CD34+ cells/kg), days to platelet and neutrophil engraftment. We also evaluated the association between CD34+ cells collected and the number of cycles of LEN therapy. Results: Of 310 patients, 90% were mobilized with only G-CSF initially. Patients were analyzed as two groups: LEN exposed (LEN(+); n = 128) and LEN naive(LEN(-); n = 182). Median age in both groups was 58 years. No differences in race, sex and MM stage distribution were observed between the two groups. The median number of stem cells collected in the LEN(+) group was significantly less than the LEN(-) group (6.46 vs. 7.56 x 10*6 CD34 cells/kg; p= 0.0004). In addition, the median number of pheresis sessions required for adequate stem cell collection were significantly more in the LEN(+)group as compared to LEN(-) group (2 vs.1 sessions; p=0.002). In the LEN(+) group, there was a negative correlation between CD34+ cells collected and the prior number of cycles of LEN (p=0.0001). There was no statistically significant excess in the number of stem cell collection failures with G-CSF in the LEN(+) group (7% vs. 4% p=0.31). All pts who failed collection after G-CSF were successfully collected with Cytoxan or Plerixafor priming. LEN exposure had no effect on post-ASCT neutrophil or platelet recovery. Conclusions: Although Lenalidomide exposure is associated with a slightly lower CD34+ stem cell yield and on average an extra session of pheresis when G-CSF is used for mobilization, collection failure is uncommon and post-ASCT engraftment is normal.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document