scholarly journals Symptom Distress Predicts Long-Term Health and Well-Being in Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation Survivors

2014 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 387-395 ◽  
Author(s):  
Margaret F. Bevans ◽  
Sandra A. Mitchell ◽  
John A. Barrett ◽  
Michael R. Bishop ◽  
Richard Childs ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Cell Transplantation ◽  
Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Symptom Distress ◽  
Health And Well Being

Factors Affecting Quality of Life During and After Stem Cell Transplantation in Long Term Survivors – Comparison of Autologous and Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 590-590
Author(s):  
Katerina Benesova ◽  
Marie Trnkova ◽  
Miriam Lanska ◽  
Veronika Valkova ◽  
Katerina Steinerova ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Cell Transplantation ◽  
Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Myelogenous Leukemia ◽  
Long Term Survivors

Abstract Abstract 590 Background: Myeloblative conditioning (MAC) or reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) followed by autologous or allogeneic stem cell transplantation (ASCT or AlloSCT) is established and lifesaving treatment in selected indications. The quality of life (QoL) is then very important issue for long term surviving patients. The majority of data is often based on single center evaluation with limited number of patients. Therefore we have started the cross-sectional QoL project and this analysis is based on data collected from eight transplant centers. Methods: Altogether data from 1399 patients are included in the study. The FACT-G questionnaire (Q) was used for this analysis. The questionnaire consists of four parts - physical well-being (PWB), social/family well-being (SWB), emotional well-being (EWB), functional well-being (FWB). The patients completed the Q before the transplantation (at the time of indication or at the time of admission to SCT) n=304, after ASCT n=662 and after AlloSCT n=433. Patients were divided into 7 groups – before SCT, day +100, up to 1y, 1–2y, 2–3y, 3–5y and more than 5y. The clinical characteristics were obtained from national transplant registry; the data was cleaned and updated. Wilcoxon and Kruskall-Wallis tests were used for statistical analysis. Patient′s characteristic: The ASCT and AlloSCT groups (grp.) consist of 869 and 530 pts resp. including 207 pts before ASCT and 97 before AlloSCT. There were 52.8% and 55.7% men in ASCT and AlloSCT grp. resp. The median age in ASCT and AlloSCT grp. resp. was: 55.2 and 43.2y resp., the median follow-up 4.4 and 4.5y resp. The most frequent diagnosis of ASCT group were: Non-Hodgkin′s lymphoma (NHL) 46.1%, multiple myeloma (MM) 36.6%, Hodgkin′s lymphoma (HL) 8.5%. In AlloSCT: acute myelogenous leukemia 29.4%, acute lymphoblastic leukemia 15.7%, chronic myeloid leukemia 11.5% and myelodysplastic syndrome 10.0%. Disease progression/relapse was observed in 148 ASCT (22.4%) and 61 AlloSCT (14.1%) pts. In AlloSCT group MAC was used in 33% pts and matched unrelated donor (MUD) in 59.8% pts., aGVHD gr I-II was observed in 40.3% and gr III-IV 4.2% pts, cGVHD in 37.9% pts. Results: Significant differences in overall QoL before, during and after the AlloSCT (p<0.001) and ASCT (p=0.01) were observed. The QoL was improved from 1y after ASCT as well as from 2y after Allo-SCT. It was due mainly to the PWB and FWB improvement in both SCT groups, SWB and EWB remained unchanged. Long term survivors reported better QoL vs pts before transplant both in the alloSCT gr. (89 vs 80.7 points) as well as in ASCT gr.(82 vs 73.1). Interestingly, significantly better QoL in AlloSCT vs ASCT gr. was reported in all time points except day +100 and 2y. At the time of indication it was 80.7 vs 73.1 (p=0.035) and the most significant difference was among long-term survivors 89.0 vs 82.0 (p<0.001). The overall QoL was not affected by gender, women only reported better SWB in AlloSCT and ASCT grp. and men reported better EWB in ASCT gr. The age had significant impact on overall QoL in ASCT (p=0.005) and AlloSCT (p=0.006) but only due to difference in PWB and FWB resp., which was more profound in AlloSCT (p<0.001). The diagnosis had no impact on QoL in AlloSCT grp. but the MM pts have significantly lower QoL compared to NHL and HL pts. resp. (73 vs 80 vs 82 resp. p<0.001) in ASCT group. There was no significant impact of MAC or RIC on the QoL, patients with MUD has lower QoL compared to sibling donor (84.8 vs 88, p<0.05). Relapse after transplantation was associated with worse QoL, after ASCT 74 vs 81 (p=0.02) and after AlloSCT 81.5 vs 87.5 (borderline significance p =0.065). The long term survivor′s QoL was not affected by aGVHD in contrast to the cGVHD which significantly affects QoL (p<0.001) due to lower PWB (p<0.001) and FWB (p<0.001). Conclusion: We herein demostrate on large cohorts of pts that long term survivors have significantly better QoL compared to QoL in the time of indication of the transplantation and the improvement starts from 1y after ASCT and from 2y after AlloSCT. AlloSCT survivors report better QoL compared to the ASCT survivors. The most important factors affected QoL are age, cGVHD (AlloSCT) and diagnosis (ASCT), the borderline factors are relapse after SCT and type of donor (AlloSCT). Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

scholarly journals What is known about palliative care in adult patients with allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT)?

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steffen T. Simon ◽  
Anne Pralong ◽  
Michael Hallek ◽  
Christoph Scheid ◽  
Udo Holtick ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Cell Transplantation ◽  
Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Negative Impact ◽  
Chronic Gvhd ◽  
Care Needs ◽  
Post Transplantation

AbstractPatients undergoing allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) are given a real chance of cure, but at the same time are confronted with a considerable risk of mortality and of severe long-term impediments. This narrative, non-systematic literature review aims to describe the supportive and palliative care needs of allo-SCT recipients, including long-term survivors or those relapsing or dying after transplantation. It also evaluates the feasibility and effectivity of integrating palliative care early in transplant procedures. In this appraisal of available literature, the main findings relate to symptoms like fatigue and psychological distress, which appear to be very common in the whole allo-SCT trajectory and might even persist many years post-transplantation. Chronic GvHD has a major negative impact on quality of life. Overall, there is a paucity of research on further issues in the context of allo-SCT, like the distress related to the frequently unpredictable post-transplant trajectory and prognosis, as well as the end-of-life phase. First randomized controlled results support the effectiveness of early integration of specialized palliative care expertise into transplant algorithms. Barriers to this implementation are discussed.

scholarly journals The Burden of Survivorship on Hematological Patients—Long-Term Analysis of Toxicities after Total Body Irradiation and Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (22) ◽  
pp. 5640
Author(s):  
Michael Oertel ◽  
Jonas Martel ◽  
Jan-Henrik Mikesch ◽  
Sergiu Scobioala ◽  
Christian Reicherts ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
Side Effects ◽  
Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Cell Transplantation ◽  
Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Total Body Irradiation ◽  
Whole Body ◽  
Total Body

Total body irradiation is an effective conditioning modality before autologous or allogeneic stem cell transplantation. With the whole body being the radiation target volume, a diverse spectrum of toxicities has been reported. This fact prompted us to investigate the long-term sequelae of this treatment concept in a large patient cohort. Overall, 322 patients with acute leukemia or myelodysplastic syndrome with a minimum follow-up of one year were included (the median follow-up in this study was 68 months). Pulmonary, cardiac, ocular, neurological and renal toxicities were observed in 23.9%, 14.0%, 23.6%, 23.9% and 20.2% of all patients, respectively. The majority of these side effects were grades 1 and 2 (64.9–89.2% of all toxicities in the respective categories). The use of 12 Gray total body irradiation resulted in a significant increase in ocular toxicities (p = 0.013) and severe mucositis (p < 0.001). Renal toxicities were influenced by the age at transplantation (relative risk: 1.06, p < 0.001) and disease entity. In summary, total body irradiation triggers a multifaceted, but manageable, toxicity profile. Except for ocular toxicities and mucositis, a 12 Gray regimen did not lead to an increase in long-term side effects.

Psychosocial and Behavioral Issues in Stem Cell Transplantation

2006 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sean Phipps
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Cell Transplantation ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Unrelated Donor ◽  
Behavioral Issues ◽  
Leukemic Relapse

Stem cell transplantation (SCT) or bone marrow transplantation (BMT) has evolved from a heroic, experimental therapy of last resort to a standard therapy for many high-risk leukemias and the preferred first option after leukemic relapse (Sanders, 1997; Santos, 2000; Treleaven & Barrett, 1998; Wingard, 1997). The indications for SCT have widened to include a number of other malignant disorders, including lymphomas, solid tumors, and even brain tumors, as well as to a growing number of nonmalignant disorders (Meller & Pinkerton, 1998; Santos, 2000; Treleaven & Barrett, 1998). The growth of bone marrow registries that allow for wider use of unrelated donor transplants and developments in stem cell selection techniques that allow for haplotype transplants using mismatched family donors, including parents, have greatly increased the availability of SCT as a viable treatment option for seriously ill children (Mehta & Powles, 2000). At the same time, advances in supportive care have led to improved survival outcomes and thus to a rapidly growing number of long-term survivors of SCT (Santos, 2000; Treleaven & Barrett, 1998). Yet, despite the extraordinary medical and technical advances that have saved the lives of many children, SCT remains a high-risk medical procedure involving a prolonged and physically demanding treatment regimen that can challenge the coping capacities of patients and their families. Psychosocial research in pediatric SCT has progressed more slowly, but available studies indicate that SCT is a stressful experience that can have a negative impact on the social functioning, self-esteem, and general emotional well-being of survivors (Barrera, Pringle, Sumbler, & Saunders, 2000; McConville et al., 1990; Parsons, Barlow, Levy, Supran, & Kaplan, 1999; Phipps, Brenner, et al., 1995; Phipps & Barclay, 1996; Rodrigue, Graham-Pole, Kury, Kubar, & Hoffman, 1995; Stuber, Nader, Yasuda, Pynoos, & Cohen, 1991; Vannatta, Zeller, Noll, & Koontz, 1998). A number of studies have also focused on parental response to SCT (Barrera et al., 2000; Kronenberger et al., 1998; Manne et al., 2001, 2002; Phipps, Dunavant, Lensing, & Rai, 2004; Rodrigue et al., 1996; Streisand, Rodrigue, Houck, Graham-Pole, & Berlant, 2000). Much of the literature to date has focused on long-term outcomes in survivors, particularly neurocognitive and academic outcomes.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document