leukemic relapse
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

107
(FIVE YEARS 9)

H-INDEX

22
(FIVE YEARS 2)

Author(s):  
Line Stensig Lynggaard ◽  
Cecilie Utke Rank ◽  
Stefan Nygaard Hansen ◽  
Sofie Gottschalk Højfeldt ◽  
Louise Tram Henriksen ◽  
...  

Asparaginase treatment is a mainstay in contemporary treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), but substantial asparaginase-related toxicity may lead to jeopardized protocol compliance and compromises survival. We investigated the association between risk of asparaginase-associated toxicities (AspTox) and asparaginase enzyme activity (AEA) levels in 1,155 children aged 1.0-17.9 years, diagnosed with ALL between July 2008 and March 2016 and treated according to the Nordic Society of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology (NOPHO) ALL2008 protocol. Patients with ≥2 blood samples for AEA measurement drawn 14 ± 2 days after asparaginase administration were included (6,944 trough values). AEA was measurable (or above >0 IU/L) in 955 patients while 200 patients (17.3%) had asparaginase inactivation and few AspTox recorded. A time-dependent multiple Cox model of time to any first asparaginase-associated toxicity adjusted for sex and age was used. For patients with measurable AEA, we found a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.17 per 100 IU/L increase in median AEA (95% CI, 0.98-1.41; p=0.09). For pancreatitis, thromboembolism, and osteonecrosis, the HRs were 1.40 (95% CI, 1.12-1.75; p=0.002), 0.99 (95% CI, 0.70-1.40; p = 0.96), and 1.36 (95% CI, 1.04-1.77; p=0.02) per 100 IU/L increase in median AEA, respectively. No significant decrease in the risk of leukemic relapse was found: HR 0.88 per 100 IU/L increase in AEA (95% CI, 0.66-1.16; p=0.35). In conclusion, these results emphasize that overall AspTox and relapse are not associated with AEA levels, yet the risk of pancreatitis and osteonecrosis increases with increasing AEA levels.


Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 6-7
Author(s):  
David C Shyr ◽  
Bing Melody Zhang ◽  
Robertson Parkman ◽  
Simon E. Brewer

The ability to accurately predict leukemic relapse post-HSCT would improve outcomes by allowing pre-emptive therapeutic strategies. Recent studies have identified post-transplant T- and CD34 cell chimerism as predictors of relapse in patients, who had undergone HSCT for hematologic malignancies (Preuner et al, 2016; Lee et al, 2015). However, these studies assess relapse risk looking at only a single threshold of chimerism using standard regression analysis, which permits only limited consideration of other patient variables. As the result, the findings of these analysis are frequently not applicable to patients generally. Machine learning methods offer the possibility to capture nonlinear relationships and simultaneous interactions between multiple variables, thus better recapitulate the dynamics and nuances of the relapse process in different patients. We use machine learning methods, specifically random forest classification (RF), to build a predictive model of post-transplant relapse and to analyze the data from a cohort of 46 pediatric patients, who received HSCT for acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and had serial lineage-specific chimerism testing post-transplant. Our model achieved 58 % sensitivity and 98% specificity at predicting relapses in cross validation compared to a baseline model (24% sensitivity, 76% specificity). Consistent with previous reports, our model implicates both peripheral blood (PB) donor CD34 and CD3 chimerism as important variables for relapse. More importantly, the RF showed how different variables interacted with each other, providing additional insights into how to best interpret post-transplant chimerism results. To our knowledge, this is the first study featuring RF machine learning methods in the clinical setting of relapse after HSCT. We use a dataset of patients with ALL undergoing HSCT at Lucile Packard Children's Hospital from 2012 to 2018. Variables collected are summarized in Table 1. The analytical sensitivity of STR-based chimerism testing is 1%. Chimerism results on the same day of relapse were excluded from the analysis. The RF model is based on a set of 500 individual decision trees, each based on a bootstrapped sample of the patient data. A 5-fold cross-validation was used to test predictive skill, with 20% of patients excluded from each fold. We compared results with a Monte Carlo baseline model in which relapse status was repeatedly assigned randomly to each patient with a probability based on the prevalence of relapse in our cohort. Patients, transplantation, and relapse characteristics are summarized in Table 2. Chimerism data are summarized in Table 3. The cross-validation results show a robust predictive skill of relapse within 2 years post-transplant. Our RF achieved 58% sensitivity and 98% specificity, greatly improving the predictive values from the base model (Table 4). Variable importance, the ability of a variable to decrease the error of the prediction model, was calculated for all variables used in our RF (Figure 1). Our analysis shows that the age at the time of transplant has the highest importance, followed by PB donor CD34 chimerism. Bone marrow chimerism generally has lower importance suggesting PB monitoring only is adequate in the clinical setting. We showcase the relationships of 1) age at transplant, 2) donor PB CD34, and 3) donor PB CD3 chimerism to the odds of relapse using a partial dependence plot. Younger patients relapse less often. Donor PB CD34 chimerism exhibits a threshold effect, in which the odds of relapse dramatically decreases when it is above 95% while donor PB CD3 chimerism has a more gradual linear profile (Figure 2). 2D dependence plot of donor PB CD34 and PB CD3 chimerism shows the interaction of the two variables (Figure 3) as continuous variables; relapse risk remaining low with even if donor PB CD3 chimerism is as low as 50% as long as donor PB CD34 chimerism is > 95%. Our study shows that machine learning methods such as RF can be very useful at making accurate predictive model of post-HSCT complications that incorporates multiple variables, allowing for more granular differentiation between different patients. Such analyses can enable more effective deployment of risk-adapted, personalized treatment. By building hundreds of independent decision trees, the RF is also able provide useful insights to the interaction between different variables in a clinically relevant manner. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2020 ◽  
Vol 68 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kerri McInnis‐Smith ◽  
Lisa A Mansueto ◽  
Kristian Schafernak ◽  
Jeffrey Jacobsen ◽  
Michael M Henry ◽  
...  

ESMO Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (5) ◽  
pp. e000977
Author(s):  
André Baruchel ◽  
Patrick Brown ◽  
Carmelo Rizzari ◽  
Lewis Silverman ◽  
Inge van der Sluis ◽  
...  

Insufficient exposure to asparaginase therapy is a barrier to optimal treatment and survival in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL). Three important reasons for inactivity or discontinuation of asparaginase therapy are infusion related reactions (IRRs), pancreatitis and life-threatening central nervous system (CNS). For IRRs, real-time therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) and premedication are important aspects to be considered. For pancreatitis and CNS thrombosis one key question is if patients should be re-exposed to asparaginase after their occurrence.An expert panel met during the Congress of the International Society for Paediatric Oncology in Lyon in October 2019 to discuss strategies for diminishing the impact of these three toxicities. The panel agreed that TDM is particularly useful for optimising asparaginase treatment and that when a tight pharmacological monitoring programme is established premedication could be implemented more broadly to minimise the risk of IRR. Re-exposure to asparaginase needs to be balanced against the anticipated risk of leukemic relapse. However, more prospective data are needed to give clear recommendations if to re-expose patients to asparaginase after the occurrence of severe pancreatitis and CNS thrombosis.


2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (2) ◽  
pp. 145-154 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cecilie U. Rank ◽  
Benjamin O. Wolthers ◽  
Kathrine Grell ◽  
Birgitte K. Albertsen ◽  
Thomas L. Frandsen ◽  
...  

PURPOSE Asparaginase-associated pancreatitis (AAP) is common in patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), but risk differences across age groups both in relation to first-time AAP and after asparaginase re-exposure have not been explored. PATIENTS AND METHODS We prospectively registered AAP (n = 168) during treatment of 2,448 consecutive ALL patients aged 1.0-45.9 years diagnosed from July 2008 to October 2018 and treated according to the Nordic Society of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology (NOPHO) ALL2008 protocol. RESULTS Compared with patients aged 1.0-9.9 years, adjusted AAP hazard ratios (HRa) were associated with higher age with almost identical HRa (1.6; 95% CI, 1.1 to 2.3; P = .02) for adolescents (10.0-17.9 years) and adults (18.0-45.9 years). The day 280 cumulative incidences of AAP were 7.0% for children (1.0-9.9 years: 95% CI, 5.4 to 8.6), 10.1% for adolescents (10.0 to 17.9 years: 95% CI, 7.0 to 13.3), and 11.0% for adults (18.0-45.9 years: 95% CI, 7.1 to 14.9; P = .03). Adolescents had increased odds of both acute (odds ratio [OR], 5.2; 95% CI, 2.1 to 13.2; P = .0005) and persisting complications (OR, 6.7; 95% CI, 2.4 to 18.4; P = .0002) compared with children (1.0-9.9 years), whereas adults had increased odds of only persisting complications (OR, 4.1; 95% CI, 1.4 to 11.8; P = .01). Fifteen of 34 asparaginase-rechallenged patients developed a second AAP. Asparaginase was truncated in 17/21 patients with AAP who subsequently developed leukemic relapse, but neither AAP nor the asparaginase truncation was associated with increased risk of relapse. CONCLUSION Older children and adults had similar AAP risk, whereas morbidity was most pronounced among adolescents. Asparaginase re-exposure should be considered only for patients with an anticipated high risk of leukemic relapse, because multiple studies strongly indicate that reduction of asparaginase treatment intensity increases the risk of relapse.


2019 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 216-222 ◽  
Author(s):  
Prachi Jain ◽  
Xin Tian ◽  
Stefan Cordes ◽  
Jinguo Chen ◽  
Caroline R. Cantilena ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 2693-2693
Author(s):  
Swati Naik ◽  
Premal Lulla ◽  
Ifigeneia Tzannou ◽  
Robert A. Krance ◽  
George Carrum ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Leukemic relapse remains the major cause of treatment failure in hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) recipients. While the infusion of donor lymphocytes to prevent and treat relapse has been clinically implemented this strategy does not provide durable remissions and carries the risk of life-threatening graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). More recently the adoptive transfer of T cells that have been engineered to express CD19-targeted chimeric antigen receptors (CARs), has shown potent anti-leukemic activity in HSCT recipients with recurrent disease. However, disease relapse with the emergence of CD19 negative tumors is an emerging clinical issue post-administration of these mono-targeted T cells. To overcome these limitations, we developed a protocol for the generation of donor-derived T cell lines that simultaneously targeted a range of tumor associated antigens (multiTAAs) that are frequently expressed by B- and T-cell ALL including PRAME, WT1 and Survivin for adoptive transfer to high risk recipients transplanted for ALL. Methods/Results: We were consistently able to generate donor-derived multiTAA-specific T cells by culturing PBMCs in the presence of a Th1-polarizing/pro-proliferative cytokine cocktail, using autologous DCs as APCs and loading them with pepmixes (15 mer peptides overlapping by 11 amino acids) spanning all 3 target antigens. The use of whole antigen increases the range of patient HLA polymorphisms that can be exploited beyond those matched to single peptides, while targeting multiple antigens simultaneously reduces the risk of tumor immune evasion. To date, we have generated 14 clinical grade multiTAA-specific T cell lines comprising CD3+ T cells (mean 94±9%) with a mixture of CD4+ (mean 21±28%) and CD8+ (mean 52±24 %) cells, which expressed central [CD45RO+/CD62L+: 14±9%] and effector memory markers [CD45RO+/CD62L-: 80±11%] associated with long term in vivo persistence. The expanded lines recognized the targeted antigens WT1, PRAME and Survivin by IFNg ELIspot with activity against >1 targeted antigens in all cases. None of the lines reacted against non-malignant patient-derived cells (4±3% specific lysis; E: T 20:1) - a study release criterion. Thus far we have treated 8 high risk ALL patients with donor derived TAA T cells post-transplant to prevent disease relapse (Table 1). Infusions were well tolerated with no dose-limiting toxicity, GVHD, CRS or other adverse events. Two patients were not evaluable per study criteria as they received >0.5mg/kg of steroids within 4 weeks of infusion and were replaced. Five of the 6 remaining patients infused remain in CR a median of 11.2 months post-infusion (range 9-22 months). We detected the expansion of tumor-reactive T cells in patient peripheral blood post-infusion against both targeted (WT1, Survivin, PRAME) and non-targeted antigens (SSX2, MAGE-A4, -A1, -A2B, -C1, MART1, AFP and NYESO1) reflecting epitope and antigen spreading. The single patient who relapsed showed no evidence of tumor-directed T cell expansion despite receiving 3 additional infusions at 4 week intervals. Conclusion: In summary, infusion of donor multi-TAA-specific T cells to patients with ALL post allogeneic HSCT is feasible, safe and as evidenced by expansion and antigen spreading in patients, may contribute to disease control. This strategy may present a promising addition to current immunotherapeutic approaches for prophylaxis for leukemic relapse in HSCT recipients. Table 1. Table 1. Disclosures Vera: Marker: Equity Ownership. Heslop:Marker: Equity Ownership; Cytosen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Cell Medica: Research Funding; Gilead Biosciences: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Tessa Therapeutics: Research Funding; Viracyte: Equity Ownership. Leen:Marker: Equity Ownership.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document