scholarly journals Sir2 links the unfolded protein response and the heat shock response in a stress response network

2015 ◽  
Vol 457 (3) ◽  
pp. 473-478 ◽  
Author(s):  
Esther Weindling ◽  
Shoshana Bar-Nun
2010 ◽  
Vol 29 (7) ◽  
pp. 551-554 ◽  
Author(s):  
Suresh IS Rattan ◽  
Taru Deva

The scientific foundations of hormesis are now well established and include various biochemical and molecular criteria for testing the hormetic nature of chemicals and other modulators. In order to claim homeopathy as being hormetic, it is essential that, in addition to the hormetic biphasic dose response, homeopathic remedies should fulfill one or more molecular criteria. Since stress response pathways, such as heat shock response, antioxidative response, autophagic response and unfolded protein response, are integral components of the physiological hormesis, it is important that homeopathic drugs be tested for these pathways if these are to be considered as hormetins and to cause hormesis.


2017 ◽  
Vol 114 (8) ◽  
pp. 2084-2089 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ganesh M. Nawkar ◽  
Chang Ho Kang ◽  
Punyakishore Maibam ◽  
Joung Hun Park ◽  
Young Jun Jung ◽  
...  

Light influences essentially all aspects of plant growth and development. Integration of light signaling with different stress response results in improvement of plant survival rates in ever changing environmental conditions. Diverse environmental stresses affect the protein-folding capacity of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), thus evoking ER stress in plants. Consequently, the unfolded protein response (UPR), in which a set of molecular chaperones is expressed, is initiated in the ER to alleviate this stress. Although its underlying molecular mechanism remains unknown, light is believed to be required for the ER stress response. In this study, we demonstrate that increasing light intensity elevates the ER stress sensitivity of plants. Moreover, mutation of the ELONGATED HYPOCOTYL 5 (HY5), a key component of light signaling, leads to tolerance to ER stress. This enhanced tolerance ofhy5plants can be attributed to higher expression of UPR genes. HY5 negatively regulates the UPR by competing with basic leucine zipper 28 (bZIP28) to bind to the G-box–like element present in the ER stress response element (ERSE). Furthermore, we found that HY5 undergoes 26S proteasome-mediated degradation under ER stress conditions. Conclusively, we propose a molecular mechanism of crosstalk between the UPR and light signaling, mediated by HY5, which positively mediates light signaling, but negatively regulates UPR gene expression.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document