Differential sensitivities of transcription factor target genes underlie cell type-specific gene expression profiles

2007 ◽  
Vol 38 (2) ◽  
pp. 147-148
Author(s):  
Kirby D. Johnson ◽  
Shin-Il Kim ◽  
Megan E. Boyer ◽  
Emery H. Bresnick
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Transcription Factor ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
Expression Profiles ◽  
Gene Expression Profiles ◽  
Specific Gene ◽  
Cell Type ◽  
Specific Gene Expression ◽  
Transcription Factor Target ◽  
Cell Type Specific

scholarly journals Digital sorting of complex tissues for cell type-specific gene expression profiles

2013 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 89 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yi Zhong ◽  
Ying-Wooi Wan ◽  
Kaifang Pang ◽  
Lionel ML Chow ◽  
Zhandong Liu
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Expression Profiles ◽  
Gene Expression Profiles ◽  
Specific Gene ◽  
Cell Type ◽  
Specific Gene Expression ◽  
Cell Type Specific

scholarly journals Sources of Variation in Cell-Type RNA-Seq Profiles

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Johan Gustafsson ◽  
Felix Held ◽  
Jonathan Robinson ◽  
Elias Björnson ◽  
Rebecka Jörnsten ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Single Cell ◽  
Expression Profiles ◽  
Gene Expression Profiles ◽  
Specific Gene ◽  
Rna Seq ◽  
Cell Type ◽  
Specific Gene Expression ◽  
Cell Type Specific ◽  
Technical Factors

Abstract Background Cell-type specific gene expression profiles are needed for many computational methods operating on bulk RNA-Seq samples, such as deconvolution of cell-type fractions and digital cytometry. However, the gene expression profile of a cell type can vary substantially due to both technical factors and biological differences in cell state and surroundings, reducing the efficacy of such methods. Here, we investigated which factors contribute most to this variation. Results We evaluated different normalization methods, quantified the magnitude of variation introduced by different sources, and examined the differences between UMI-based single-cell RNA-Seq and bulk RNA-Seq. We applied methods such as random forest regression to a collection of publicly available bulk and single-cell RNA-Seq datasets containing B and T cells, and found that the technical variation across laboratories is of the same magnitude as the biological variation across cell types. Tissue of origin and cell subtype are less important but still substantial factors, while the difference between individuals is relatively small. We also show that much of the differences between UMI-based single-cell and bulk RNA-Seq methods can be explained by the number of read duplicates per mRNA molecule in the single-cell sample.Conclusions Our work shows the importance of either matching or correcting for technical factors when creating cell-type specific gene expression profiles that are to be used together with bulk samples.

scholarly journals Sources of Variation in Cell-Type RNA-Seq Profiles

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Johan Gustafsson ◽  
Felix Held ◽  
Jonathan Robinson ◽  
Elias Björnson ◽  
Rebecka Jörnsten ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Single Cell ◽  
Expression Profiles ◽  
Gene Expression Profiles ◽  
Specific Gene ◽  
Rna Seq ◽  
Cell Type ◽  
Specific Gene Expression ◽  
Cell Type Specific ◽  
Technical Factors

Abstract Cell-type specific gene expression profiles are needed for many computational methods operating on bulk RNA-Seq samples, such as deconvolution of cell-type fractions and digital cytometry. However, the gene expression profile of a cell type can vary substantially due to both technical factors and biological differences in cell state and surroundings, reducing the efficacy of such methods. Here, we investigated which factors contribute most to this variation. We evaluated different normalization methods, quantified the variance explained by different factors, evaluated the effect on deconvolution of cell type fractions, and examined the differences between UMI-based single-cell RNA-Seq and bulk RNA-Seq. We investigated a collection of publicly available bulk and single-cell RNA-Seq datasets containing B and T cells, and found that the technical variation across laboratories is substantial, even for genes specifically selected for deconvolution, and has a confounding effect on deconvolution. Tissue of origin is also a substantial factor, highlighting the challenge of applying cell type profiles derived from blood on mixtures from other tissues. We also show that much of the differences between UMI-based single-cell and bulk RNA-Seq methods can be explained by the number of read duplicates per mRNA molecule in the single-cell sample. Our work shows the importance of either matching or correcting for technical factors when creating cell-type specific gene expression profiles that are to be used together with bulk samples.

scholarly journals A novel computational complete deconvolution method using RNA-seq data

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kai Kang ◽  
Qian Meng ◽  
Igor Shats ◽  
David M. Umbach ◽  
Melissa Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Expression Profiles ◽  
Gene Expression Profiles ◽  
Specific Gene ◽  
Rna Seq ◽  
Cell Type ◽  
Specific Gene Expression ◽  
Cell Type Composition ◽  
Type Composition ◽  
Cell Type Specific

AbstractThe cell type composition of many biological tissues varies widely across samples. Such sample heterogeneity hampers efforts to probe the role of each cell type in the tissue microenvironment. Current approaches that address this issue have drawbacks. Cell sorting or single-cell based experimental techniques disrupt in situ interactions and alter physiological status of cells in tissues. Computational methods are flexible and promising; but they often estimate either sample-specific proportions of each cell type or cell-type-specific gene expression profiles, not both, by requiring the other as input. We introduce a computational Complete Deconvolution method that can estimate both sample-specific proportions of each cell type and cell-type-specific gene expression profiles simultaneously using bulk RNA-Seq data only (CDSeq). We assessed our method’s performance using several synthetic and experimental mixtures of varied but known cell type composition and compared its performance to the performance of two state-of-the art deconvolution methods on the same mixtures. The results showed CDSeq can estimate both sample-specific proportions of each component cell type and cell-typespecificgene expression profiles with high accuracy. CDSeq holds promise for computationally deciphering complex mixtures of cell types, each with differing expression profiles, using RNA-seq data measured in bulk tissue (MATLAB code is available at https://github.com/kkang7/CDSeq_011).

Suppressive effects of transcription factor GATA-1 on cell type-specific gene expression in dendritic cells

2010 ◽  
Vol 62 (7) ◽  
pp. 421-429 ◽  
Author(s):  
Naomi Shimokawa ◽  
Chiharu Nishiyama ◽  
Nobuhiro Nakano ◽  
Keiko Maeda ◽  
Ryuyo Suzuki ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Dendritic Cells ◽  
Transcription Factor ◽  
Specific Gene ◽  
Cell Type ◽  
Specific Gene Expression ◽  
Cell Type Specific

scholarly journals DEBay: a computational tool for deconvolution of quantitative PCR data for estimation of cell type-specifc gene expression in a mixed population

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vimalathithan Devaraj ◽  
Biplab Bose
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Quantitative Pcr ◽  
Target Gene ◽  
Expression Profiles ◽  
Gene Expression Profiles ◽  
Mixed Population ◽  
Specific Gene ◽  
Cell Type ◽  
Computational Tool ◽  
Cell Type Specific

AbstractThe expression of a gene is commonly estimated by quantitative PCR (qPCR) using RNA isolated from a large number of pooled cells. Such pooled samples often have subpopulations of cells with different levels of expression of the target gene. Estimation of gene expression from an ensemble of cells obscures the pattern of expression in different subpopulations. Physical separation of various subpopulations is a demanding task. We have developed a computational tool, Deconvolution of Ensemble through Bayes-approach (DEBay), to estimate cell type-specific gene expression from qPCR data of a mixed population. DEBay estimates Normalized Gene Expression Coefficient (NGEC), which is a relative measure of the expression of the target gene in each cell type in a population. NGEC has a direct algebraic correspondence with the normalized fold change in gene expression measured by qPCR. DEBay can deconvolute both time-dependent and -independent gene expression profiles. It uses the Bayesian method of model selection and parameter estimation. We have evaluated DEBay using synthetic and real experimental data. DEBay is implemented in Python. A GUI of DEBay and its source code are available for download at SourceForge (https://sourceforge.net/projects/debay).

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document