scholarly journals Age-adjusted international prognostic index is a predictor of survival in gastric diffuse B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma patients

2016 ◽  
Vol 38 (3) ◽  
pp. 247-251 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcia Torresan Delamain ◽  
Maria Gomes da Silva ◽  
Eliana Cristina Martins Miranda ◽  
Joana Desterro ◽  
Stefano Luminari ◽  
...  
2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kieron Dunleavy ◽  
Wyndham H Wilson

Lymphoma is the fifth most common type of cancer in the United States, with 74,490 new cases estimated in 2009. Approximately 15% of patients with lymphoma have Hodgkin lymphoma; the remainder have one of the non-Hodgkin lymphomas. The incidence of non-Hodgkin lymphoma has increased steadily over recent decades. This chapter reviews the epidemiology, classification, clinical features, pathology, diagnostic evaluation, staging and prognosis, and treatment of Hodgkin and non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Other topics discussed include the acute and chronic effects of therapy for Hodgkin disease, as well as the subtypes of non-Hodgkin lymphomas, including indolent B cell lymphoma, follicular lymphoma, small lymphocytic lymphoma, mantle cell lymphoma, marginal-zone lymphoma, diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL), primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL), Burkitt lymphoma, and HIV-related non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Figures illustrate the cellular appearance of Hodgkin lymphoma subtypes and DLBCL, diagnosis of DLBCL subtypes by gene expression, computed tomography and plain chest film in primary mediastinal cell lymphoma, MRI of the brain in PCNSL, and gene expression and gene expression predictors of survival among patients with DLBCL treated with rituximab, cyclophosphamide, hydroxydaunorubicin, vincristine [Oncovin], and prednisone (R-CHOP). Tables describe the Ann Arbor classification and the Cotswold modification for staging of lymphoma; the International Prognostic Score for advanced Hodgkin lymphoma; the World Health Organization classification of hematopoietic neoplasms; chromosomal translocations in non-Hodgkin lymphoma; the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance scale; the International Prognostic Index for aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma; and the Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index. This chapter has 185 references. This review contains 9 tables, 7 figures and 185 references


2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kieron Dunleavy ◽  
Wyndham H Wilson

Lymphoma is the fifth most common type of cancer in the United States, with 74,490 new cases estimated in 2009. Approximately 15% of patients with lymphoma have Hodgkin lymphoma; the remainder have one of the non-Hodgkin lymphomas. The incidence of non-Hodgkin lymphoma has increased steadily over recent decades. This chapter reviews the epidemiology, classification, clinical features, pathology, diagnostic evaluation, staging and prognosis, and treatment of Hodgkin and non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Other topics discussed include the acute and chronic effects of therapy for Hodgkin disease, as well as the subtypes of non-Hodgkin lymphomas, including indolent B cell lymphoma, follicular lymphoma, small lymphocytic lymphoma, mantle cell lymphoma, marginal-zone lymphoma, diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL), primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL), Burkitt lymphoma, and HIV-related non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Figures illustrate the cellular appearance of Hodgkin lymphoma subtypes and DLBCL, diagnosis of DLBCL subtypes by gene expression, computed tomography and plain chest film in primary mediastinal cell lymphoma, MRI of the brain in PCNSL, and gene expression and gene expression predictors of survival among patients with DLBCL treated with rituximab, cyclophosphamide, hydroxydaunorubicin, vincristine [Oncovin], and prednisone (R-CHOP). Tables describe the Ann Arbor classification and the Cotswold modification for staging of lymphoma; the International Prognostic Score for advanced Hodgkin lymphoma; the World Health Organization classification of hematopoietic neoplasms; chromosomal translocations in non-Hodgkin lymphoma; the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance scale; the International Prognostic Index for aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma; and the Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index. This chapter has 185 references.


Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 2481-2481
Author(s):  
E. Kalinka ◽  
J. Wajs ◽  
K.S. Sulek ◽  
M. Blasinska-Morawiec ◽  
P. Centkowski ◽  
...  

Abstract To comparatively assess first-line treatment with cladribine single (C) or in combination with cyclophosphamide (CC), and COP (cyclophosphamide, vincristine, prednisone) in low grade B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), previously untreated patients (pts) with Ann Arbor stage II-IV were randomly allocated to receive 6 monthly courses of either C, CC, or COP. End points were treatment response, freedom from progression (FFP) and overall survival (OS), and tolerance. From June 1, 2000 to June 30, 2005, 196 pts were randomized in 17 centers. Of 153 pts for whom data is available, 55 (36%) were diagnosed as small lymphocytic, 11 lymphoplasmocytoid (7%), 37 marginal-zone (24%), 42 follicular (27.5%), and 8 not otherwise specified low grade B-cell NHL (5.5%). Randomization constituted comparable groups, including International Prognostic Index variables. Compared to C and CC, COP induced lower overall response rates (75%, 90%, 50%, χ2 =7.9 p<.005), including lower complete remission rates (38%, 62%, 9.5%, χ2=19.2 p<.0001). With a median follow-up of 15 months, FFP was superior in patients receiving cladribine-containing regimens (χ2 = 21.8, log-rank p<.0001). No difference in median OS was observed. Incidences of infections (9% versus 3.5% versus 7%) and non-hematological side effects (7.5% versus 3.5% versus 7%) were similar in the randomized groups, whereas CC but not C induced more frequent peripheral cytopenias compared to COP (30% versus 11%, p=.034). This resulted in higher frequency of prolongation of intervals between CC versus COP treated pts (respectively 45% and 21%, χ2=6.04 p=.014) and C versus CC treated pts (respectively 26% and 45%, χ2=4.24, p=.039). Dose reductions because of hematological or other toxicity were comparable in C (9.5%), CC (20%), and COP (21%) groups. Although final results warrant completed data for all randomised pts with longer follow-up, similar tolerance and higher efficacy of cladribine-based regimens over COP provide rationale to combine C or CC with rituximab in future clinical trials.


2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kieron Dunleavy ◽  
Wyndham H Wilson

Lymphoma is the fifth most common type of cancer in the United States, with 74,490 new cases estimated in 2009. Approximately 15% of patients with lymphoma have Hodgkin lymphoma; the remainder have one of the non-Hodgkin lymphomas. The incidence of non-Hodgkin lymphoma has increased steadily over recent decades. This chapter reviews the epidemiology, classification, clinical features, pathology, diagnostic evaluation, staging and prognosis, and treatment of Hodgkin and non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Other topics discussed include the acute and chronic effects of therapy for Hodgkin disease, as well as the subtypes of non-Hodgkin lymphomas, including indolent B cell lymphoma, follicular lymphoma, small lymphocytic lymphoma, mantle cell lymphoma, marginal-zone lymphoma, diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL), primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL), Burkitt lymphoma, and HIV-related non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Figures illustrate the cellular appearance of Hodgkin lymphoma subtypes and DLBCL, diagnosis of DLBCL subtypes by gene expression, computed tomography and plain chest film in primary mediastinal cell lymphoma, MRI of the brain in PCNSL, and gene expression and gene expression predictors of survival among patients with DLBCL treated with rituximab, cyclophosphamide, hydroxydaunorubicin, vincristine [Oncovin], and prednisone (R-CHOP). Tables describe the Ann Arbor classification and the Cotswold modification for staging of lymphoma; the International Prognostic Score for advanced Hodgkin lymphoma; the World Health Organization classification of hematopoietic neoplasms; chromosomal translocations in non-Hodgkin lymphoma; the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance scale; the International Prognostic Index for aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma; and the Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index. This chapter has 185 references.


Blood ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 100 (5) ◽  
pp. 1634-1640 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph A. Sparano ◽  
Edie Weller ◽  
Tipu Nazeer ◽  
Thomas Habermann ◽  
Ann E. Traynor ◽  
...  

Preclinical and clinical evidence suggest a potential advantage for infusional therapy in lymphoma. Sixty-two analyzable patients with predominantly intermediate-grade non-Hodgkin lymphoma received cyclophosphamide (200 mg/m2 per day), doxorubicin (12.5 mg/m2 per day), and etoposide (60 mg/m2per day) (CDE) by continuous intravenous infusion for 4 days (96 hours) every 3 weeks for a maximum of 8 cycles. By the age-adjusted International Prognostic Index (IPI), 42% were at high risk and 58% were at high-intermediate risk. Complete response (CR) occurred in 30 (48%) patients (95% confidence interval [CI], 35%, 64%), and partial response occurred in 16 (26%) patients, yielding an overall response rate of 74% (95% CI, 62%, 84%). Failure-free survival (FFS) rates at 1 and 2 years were 55% (95% CI, 43%, 67%) and 50% (95% CI, 38%, 62%), respectively. When comparing the outcome for 62 patients receiving infusional CDE with historical data derived from 927 IPI-matched lymphoma patients using a Cox proportional hazards model, there was a nonsignificant trend favoring CDE in FFS (P = .12) and overall survival (P = .09). Severe or life-threatening toxicity included neutropenia (68%), anemia (57%), thrombocytopenia (44%), and infection (24%). Two patients (3%) died of treatment-related infectious complications. The primary end point of improving 1-year FFS from 55% to 70% was not achieved with infusional CDE given as initial therapy in patients with poor-risk intermediate-grade lymphoma. It is unlikely that infusional therapy as used in this study produces a 25% or greater relative improvement in FFS compared with standard therapy.


Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 4588-4588
Author(s):  
Luis F. Pracchia ◽  
Juliana Pereira ◽  
Marcelo Belesso ◽  
Beatriz Beitler ◽  
Dalton A. Chamone

Abstract In this retrospective study we described the response and toxicity of a modified Magrath IVAC (mIVAC) regimen in 25 patients with refractory/relapsed aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). The mIVAC consisted of ifosfamide 1,500mg/m2 (one-hour infusion beginning at 9:00; D1 to D5), mesna 300mg/m2 (bolus at hours 9:00, 13:00, 17:00; D1 to D5), citarabine 2,000 mg/m2 (two one-hour infusions beginning at 8:00 and 16:00; D1 and D2) and etoposide 60 mg/m2 (one-hour infusion beginning at 10:00; D1 to D5). Treatment was repeated every four weeks for a maximum of six cycles. Patients who achieved partial remission or complete remission after at least three courses were offered autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT), if eligible. The median age was 37 years (range 18 to 59 years). Twenty-two (88%) patients had diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, fourteen (56%) had relapsed disease and 10 (40%) were considered high-intermediate and high risk by age-adjusted International Prognostic Index. The overall response rate was 68% (95% CI: 46%–90%). A total of 64 cycles were given, with a median of three courses per patient. Grade 3/4 neutropenia was observed after 85,6% of the courses, and grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia was observed after 87,5% of the courses. Grade 3/4 neutropenic fever occurred after 28% of the courses. Non-hematologic toxic effects were rare, predominantly grade 1/2. No toxic deaths were observed. Fifteen (88%) of the 17 responding patients underwent ASCT. With a median follow-up of 14 months, the median overall survival time for mIVAC sensitive patients was 16 months. This regimen may be feasible for patient with relapsed and refractory aggressive NHL in countries with inadequate numbers of hospital beds.


Blood ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 106 (11) ◽  
pp. 4738-4738
Author(s):  
Joanna Sawczuk-Chabin ◽  
Ewa Kalinka ◽  
Piotr Centkowski ◽  
Katarzyna Budziszewska ◽  
Bernadeta Ceglarek ◽  
...  

Abstract The purpose of the study was to evaluate response, duration of response, and toxicity of fludarabine (F), mitoxantrone (M), and dexamethason (D) (FMD) in patients (pts) with relapsed or refractory low-grade non-Hodgkin lymphoma (LGNHL). 26 pts with advanced relapsed/refractory LGNHL exposed to previous chemotherapy (CHT) received 3–6 monthly cycles of FMD. The median age was 60 years (range 34–73), included 13 male (50%) and 13 female (50 %). The regimen consisted of F (25 mg/m2 i.v., day 1–3), M (10 mg/m2 i.v., day 1) and D (20 mg p.o., day 1–5). Parameters analyzed included response, toxicity and infection rates, number of previous CHT lines, performance status (ECOG), Ann Arbor scale, LDH, International Prognostic Index score, freedom from progression (FFP) and overall survival (OS). In total 78 cycles of FMD was administered. This induced 25% complete and 37,5% partial response, with a total response rate of 62,5%. After 14 months of the median follow-up of the pts remaining alive, median FFP was 11 months and median OS has not been achieved yet. Out of 78 administered cycles 16 (20%) were associated with toxicity, including 8 (10%) severe infections despite prophylaxis and 6 (8%) grade III/IV neutropenias. In addition, one case of grade III/IV thrombocytopenia and acute noninflammatory renal dysfunction were observed. Toxicity rate was not correlated with the number of previous CHT lines or ECOG, but IPI >2 was significant factor predictive for FMD-related toxicity (p=.037). Shorter OS was observed for the pts with ECOG>1 (p=.049), IPI>2 (p=.005) and FMD-related toxicity (p=.036). FMD is an active regimen for relapsed and refractory LGNHL. Toxicity rate is substantial and seems to predict survival.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document