In vitro activity of ceftazidime-avibactam against Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates collected in Latin America as part of the ATLAS global surveillance program, 2017–2019

Abstract Background Ceftazidime–avibactam (CAZ-AVI) is a β-lactam/non-β-lactam β-lactamase inhibitor combination that can inhibit class A, C and some class D β-lactamases. Resistance caused by these β-lactamases often results in multidrug-resistance (MDR). This study evaluated the in vitro activity of CAZ-AVI and comparators against MDR Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates collected from patients in Latin America. Methods Nonduplicate clinical isolates were collected in 2016–2017 in 6 countries in Latin America. Susceptibility testing was performed using CLSI broth microdilution and interpreted using CLSI 2019 and FDA (tigecycline) breakpoints. MDR was defined as nonsusceptible (NS) (intermediate or resistant) to ≥3 of 7 sentinel drugs: amikacin, aztreonam, cefepime, levofloxacin, colistin, meropenem, and piperacillin–tazobactam. Results The activity of CAZ-AVI and comparators against all isolates and MDR subsets is shown in the table. MDR rates ranged from 28.4% among E. cloacae to 41.5% among K. pneumoniae. CAZ-AVI was active against >97% of Enterobacteriaceae isolates and maintained activity against >92% of MDR isolates of the examined species. No other tested drug consistently exceeded this activity. Among P. aeruginosa, CAZ-AVI was active against 87% of all isolates and 63% of MDR isolates; only colistin was more active. The two most common MDR phenotypes among Enterobacteriaceae were (1) NS to aztreonam, cefepime, and levofloxacin (n = 580, 41% of all MDR Enterobacteriaceae; 100% susceptible to CAZ-AVI) and (2) NS to aztreonam, cefepime, levofloxacin, and piperacillin–tazobactam (n = 301, 21% of all MDR isolates; 99.7% susceptible to CAZ-AVI). The two most common MDR phenotypes among P. aeruginosa were (1) NS to all sentinel drugs except colistin (n = 154, 33% of all MDR isolates; 30.5% susceptible to CAZ-AVI) and (2) NS to all drugs except colistin and amikacin (n = 97, 21% of all MDR isolates; 70.1% susceptible to CAZ-AVI). Conclusion These in vitro data suggest that CAZ-AVI can be an effective treatment option for infections caused by MDR Enterobacteriaceae and P. aeruginosa collected in Latin America. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

Download Full-text

1244. In Vitro Activity of Ceftazidime-Avibactam and Comparator Agents Against MDR Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa Collected in Latin America During the ATLAS Global Surveillance Program 2018-2019

Open Forum Infectious Diseases ◽

10.1093/ofid/ofab466.1436 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 8 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. S711-S711

Author(s):

Sibylle Lob ◽

Meredith Hackel ◽

Gregory Stone ◽

Daniel F Sahm

Keyword(s):

Pseudomonas Aeruginosa ◽

Latin America ◽

Vitro Activity ◽

Surveillance Program ◽

In Vitro Activity ◽

Effective Treatment Option ◽

Independent Contractor ◽

Class D ◽

In Vitro Data

Abstract Background Ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI) is a β-lactam/non-β-lactam β-lactamase inhibitor combination that can inhibit class A, C, and some class D β-lactamases. Resistance caused by these β-lactamases often results in multidrug-resistance (MDR). This study evaluated the in vitro activity of CAZ-AVI and comparators against MDR Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates collected from patients in Latin America. Methods Non-duplicate clinical isolates were collected in 2018-2019 in 10 countries in Latin America. Susceptibility testing was performed using CLSI broth microdilution and interpreted using CLSI 2021 and FDA (tigecycline) breakpoints. MDR was defined as resistant (R) to ≥3 of 7 sentinel drugs: amikacin (AMK), aztreonam (ATM), cefepime (FEP), colistin (CST), levofloxacin (LVX), meropenem (MEM), and piperacillin-tazobactam (TZP). Results The activity of CAZ-AVI and comparators against all isolates and MDR subsets is shown in the table. MDR rates for the studied species ranged from 16.3% among E. cloacae to 35.7% among K. pneumoniae. CAZ-AVI was active against 98% of Enterobacterales isolates and maintained activity against 74-98% of MDR isolates of the examined Enterobacterales species. Only tigecycline showed higher activity. Among P. aeruginosa, CAZ-AVI was active against 87% of all isolates and 47% of MDR isolates; no other studied drug was more active. The three most common MDR phenotypes among Enterobacterales were 1) R to ATM, FEP, and LVX (n=544, 44.8% of all MDR Enterobacterales; 100% susceptible (S) to CAZ-AVI), 2) R to ATM, FEP, LVX, and TZP (n=150, 12.4% of all MDR Enterobacterales; 99.3% S to CAZ-AVI), and 3) R to all sentinel drugs except AMK and CST (n=145, 11.9% of all MDR isolates; 78.6% S to CAZ-AVI). The three most common MDR phenotypes among P. aeruginosa were 1) R to all sentinel drugs except CST (n=85, 19.7% of all MDR isolates; 24.7% S to CAZ-AVI), 2) R to all sentinel drugs except AMK and CST (n=42, 9.7% of all MDR isolates; 66.7% S to CAZ-AVI), and 3) R to AMK, LVX, and MEM (n=37, 8.6% of all MDR isolates; 24.3% S to CAZ-AVI). Conclusion These in vitro data suggest that CAZ-AVI can be an effective treatment option for infections caused by MDR Enterobacterales and P. aeruginosa collected in Latin America. Disclosures Sibylle Lob, PhD, IHMA (Employee)Pfizer, Inc. (Independent Contractor) Meredith Hackel, PhD MPH, IHMA (Employee)Pfizer, Inc. (Independent Contractor) Gregory Stone, PhD, AztraZeneca (Shareholder, Former Employee)Pfizer, Inc. (Employee) Daniel F. Sahm, PhD, IHMA (Employee)Pfizer, Inc. (Independent Contractor)

Download Full-text

680. In vitro Activity of Ceftazidime–Avibactam and Comparator Agents Against Pseudomonas aeruginosa from ICU and Non-ICU Wards Collected in Latin America and Globally as Part of the ATLAS Surveillance Program 2016–2017

Open Forum Infectious Diseases ◽

10.1093/ofid/ofz360.748 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 6 (Supplement_2) ◽

pp. S310-S310

Author(s):

Sibylle Lob ◽

Krystyna Kazmierczak ◽

Gregory Stone ◽

Daniel F Sahm

Keyword(s):

Pseudomonas Aeruginosa ◽

Latin America ◽

Resistance Mechanisms ◽

Vitro Activity ◽

Asia Pacific ◽

Surveillance Program ◽

In Vitro Activity ◽

Class B ◽

Additional Resistance

Abstract Background Ceftazidime–avibactam (CAZ-AVI) is a β-lactam/non-β-lactam β-lactamase inhibitor combination that can inhibit class A, C and some class D β-lactamases but not class B metallo-β-lactamases (MBLs). Antimicrobial resistance due to these β-lactamases and other mechanisms is increasing and is especially high in ICUs. This study evaluated the in vitro activity of CAZ-AVI and comparators against Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from patients in ICU and non-ICU wards. Methods Nonduplicate clinical isolates were collected in 2016–2017 in Asia/Pacific, Europe, Latin America, and Middle East/Africa. Susceptibility testing was performed using CLSI broth microdilution and interpreted using CLSI 2019 breakpoints. PCR and sequencing were used to determine the β-lactamase genes present in all isolates with meropenem (MEM) MIC >2 µg/mL. Results The activity of CAZ-AVI and comparators is shown in the table. Susceptibility rates among global P. aeruginosa were generally lower for isolates from patients in ICU than non-ICU wards, but this difference was small for CAZ-AVI (89% and 92% susceptible, respectively) and for amikacin and colistin. Among MEM-nonsusceptible (NS) isolates, CAZ-AVI was active against 72% and 70% of isolates, respectively, of which 18.4% and 18.7% were MBL-positive. CAZ AVI inhibited >83% of MEM-NS MBL-negative isolates globally. In Latin America (LA), CAZ-AVI was active against 87% of isolates from both ward types. Susceptibility rates were generally lower than the global average, especially among MEM-NS isolates and isolates from non-ICU wards. The proportion of MBL-positive isolates in the MEM-NS subset was only slightly higher in LA than globally (19.2% and 19.5% in ICU and non-ICU wards, respectively), suggesting the presence of additional resistance mechanisms. Only colistin exceeded the activity of CAZ-AVI against isolates collected globally and in LA. Conclusion CAZ-AVI showed potent antimicrobial activity, second only to that of colistin, against P. aeruginosa isolates from both ICU and non-ICU wards, with >88% of isolates collected globally testing as susceptible. Activity was in part compromised by MBLs, although additional resistance mechanisms may also be responsible. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

Download Full-text

1571. In Vitro Activity of Ceftazidime-Avibactam and Comparator Agents Against MDR Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa Collected in Latin America During the ATLAS Global Surveillance Program 2017-2018

Open Forum Infectious Diseases ◽

10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.1751 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. S784-S785

Author(s):

Krystyna Kazmierczak ◽

Sibylle Lob ◽

Greg Stone ◽

Daniel F Sahm

Keyword(s):

Pseudomonas Aeruginosa ◽

Latin America ◽

Vitro Activity ◽

Surveillance Program ◽

In Vitro Activity ◽

Effective Treatment Option ◽

Independent Contractor ◽

Class D ◽

In Vitro Data

Abstract Background Ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI) is a β-lactam/non-β-lactam β-lactamase inhibitor combination that can inhibit class A, C and some class D β-lactamases. Resistance caused by these β-lactamases often results in multidrug-resistance (MDR). This study evaluated the in vitro activity of CAZ-AVI and comparators against MDR Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates collected from patients in Latin America. Methods Non-duplicate clinical isolates were collected in 2017-2018 in 10 countries in Latin America. Susceptibility testing was performed using CLSI broth microdilution and interpreted using CLSI 2020 and FDA (tigecycline) breakpoints. MDR was defined as resistant (R) to ≥3 of 7 sentinel drugs: amikacin (AMK), aztreonam (ATM), cefepime (FEP), colistin (CST), levofloxacin (LVX), meropenem (MEM), and piperacillin-tazobactam (TZP). Results The activity of CAZ-AVI and comparators against all isolates and MDR subsets is shown in the table. MDR rates for the studied species ranged from 17.6% among E. cloacae to 31.0% among K. pneumoniae. CAZ-AVI was active against 99% of Enterobacterales isolates and maintained activity against 85-99% of MDR isolates of the examined species. Only tigecycline showed comparable or higher activity. Among P. aeruginosa, CAZ-AVI was active against 86% of all isolates and 45% of MDR isolates; no other studied drug was more active. The three most common MDR phenotypes among Enterobacterales were 1) R to ATM, FEP, and LVX (n=538, 50% of all MDR Enterobacterales; 100% susceptible (S) to CAZ-AVI), 2) R to all sentinel drugs except AMK and CST (n=112, 10% of all MDR isolates; 88% S to CAZ-AVI), and 3) R to ATM, FEP, LVX, and TZP (n=111, 10% of all MDR Enterobacterales; 100% S to CAZ-AVI). The three most common MDR phenotypes among P. aeruginosa were 1) R to all sentinel drugs except CST (n=70, 22% of all MDR isolates; 20% S to CAZ-AVI), 2) R to AMK, LVX, and MEM (n=33, 10% of all MDR isolates; 33% S to CAZ-AVI), and 3) R to all sentinel drugs except AMK and CST (n=30, 9% of all MDR isolates; 70% S to CAZ-AVI). Table Conclusion These in vitro data suggest that CAZ-AVI can be an effective treatment option for infections caused by MDR Enterobacterales and P. aeruginosa collected in Latin America. Disclosures Krystyna Kazmierczak, PhD, IHMA (Employee)Pfizer, Inc. (Consultant) Sibylle Lob, PhD, IHMA (Employee)Pfizer, Inc. (Consultant) Greg Stone, PhD, AztraZeneca (Shareholder, Former Employee)Pfizer, Inc. (Employee) Daniel F. Sahm, PhD, IHMA (Employee)Pfizer, Inc. (Consultant)Shionogi & Co., Ltd. (Independent Contractor)

Download Full-text

Activity of Ceftazidime–Avibactam Against Respiratory Isolates of Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa Collected in Latin America as Part of the INFORM Global Surveillance Program, 2014–2016

Open Forum Infectious Diseases ◽

10.1093/ofid/ofx163.938 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 4 (suppl_1) ◽

pp. S379-S379

Author(s):

Krystyna Kazmierczak ◽

Mark Estabrook ◽

Gregory G Stone ◽

Dan Sahm

Keyword(s):

Pseudomonas Aeruginosa ◽

Latin America ◽

Respiratory Infections ◽

Capital Gains ◽

Vitro Activity ◽

Surveillance Program ◽

In Vitro Activity ◽

Drug Classes ◽

Tract Infections

Abstract Background The β-lactam/non-β-lactam β-lactamase inhibitor combination ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI) is active in vitro against isolates producing class A, C, and some class D β-lactamases, including extended-spectrum β-lactamases, stably derepressed AmpC, and serine carbapenemases. This study evaluated the in vitro activity of CAZ-AVI and comparators against respiratory isolates of Enterobacteriaceae (Eba) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (Pae) collected in Latin America from 2014–2016 as part of the INFORM surveillance program. Methods Non-duplicate isolates from hospitalized patients with lower respiratory tract infections were collected from 24 medical centers in Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Mexico, and Venezuela. Susceptibility (S) testing was performed by broth microdilution and interpreted using CLSI breakpoints except for CAZ-AVI (U.S. FDA) and colistin (EUCAST; Ebaonly). AVI was tested at a fixed concentration of 4 µg/mL with doubling dilutions of CAZ. Multidrug resistance (MDR) phenotype was defined as resistant by CLSI breakpoints to sentinel agents from ≥3 drug classes. Isolates were screened for β-lactamase genes by PCR and sequencing. Results CAZ-AVI showed potent in vitro activity against Eba isolates (MIC90, 0.5 µg/mL; 99.3% S) and against CAZ-non-susceptible (CAZ-NS), colistin-resistant (CST-R) and MDR subsets (>93% S). CAZ-AVI activity against meropenem-non-susceptible (MEM-NS) Eba (89.7% S) was reduced due to production of metallo-β-lactamases (MBL); MEM-NS MBL-negative isolates were 100% S. CAZ-AVI showed greater in vitro activity against Pae isolates (MIC90, 32 µg/mL; 85.4% S) than CAZ (69.2% S) or MEM (59.9% S). CAZ-AVI activity against CAZ-NS, CST-R, MEM-NS, MEM-NS MBL-negative, and MDR Paeisolates (50.4–92.6% S) also exceeded that of CAZ and MEM against these resistant subsets. Conclusion CAZ-AVI is a potential treatment option for respiratory infections in Latin America that are caused by Eba and Pae resistant to commonly used and last-in-line agents. Funding: This study was sponsored by AstraZeneca. The AstraZeneca product ceftazidime-avibactam was acquired by Pfizer in December 2016. Disclosures G. G. Stone, Pfizer: Employee, Salary AstraZeneca: Shareholder, Capital Gains

Download Full-text

1580. In Vitro Activity of Ceftazidime-Avibactam Against Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa Collected in Latin America as part of the ATLAS Global Surveillance Program, 2017-2019

Open Forum Infectious Diseases ◽

10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.1760 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. S788-S788

Author(s):

Krystyna Kazmierczak ◽

Maria Lavinea Valente ◽

Elkin Lemos ◽

Monique Baudrit ◽

Alvaro Quintana ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Pseudomonas Aeruginosa ◽

Latin America ◽

Costa Rica ◽

Therapeutic Option ◽

Treatment Options ◽

Vitro Activity ◽

Surveillance Program ◽

In Vitro Activity ◽

Independent Contractor

Abstract Background Ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI) is a β-lactam/non-β-lactam β-lactamase inhibitor combination with in vitro activity against Enterobacterales (Ent) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (Psa) carrying Class A, C and some Class D β-lactamases. We examined the in vitro activity of CAZ-AVI and comparators against isolates collected in Latin America (LA) as part of the ATLAS surveillance program. Methods Non-duplicate isolates of Ent (n=8416) and Psa (n=2521) were collected in 10 countries in Central America (CAC; Costa Rica, Dominican Republic, Guatemala, Panama [2018-2019 only]) and South America (SA; Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Mexico, Venezuela [2017-2019]). Susceptibility testing was performed by CLSI broth microdilution and values were interpreted using CLSI 2020 breakpoints. CAZ-AVI was tested at a fixed concentration of 4 µg/mL AVI. Isolates with meropenem (MEM) MICs ≥2 µg/mL (Ent) or ≥4 µg/mL (Psa) were screened for β-lactamase genes. Results CAZ-AVI demonstrated potent in vitro activity against Ent collected in LA overall and in the CAC and SA subregions (95-99% susceptible (S)) that was comparable to or exceeded the activity of comparators including MEM, amikacin (AMK) and tigecycline (TGC) (Table). CAZ-AVI retained good activity against MEM non-susceptible (NS) Ent collected in SA (82% S; 6.9% of collected isolates) but activity was reduced against MEM-NS Ent from CAC (10% S; 5.7% of collected isolates), which included a high proportion of isolates carrying NDM-type metallo-β-lactamases (MBL). Among Psa, CAZ-AVI showed greater activity than the tested comparators against both all (86-92% S) and MEM-NS (61-66% S) isolates collected in LA overall and in the two subregions. Table Conclusion CAZ-AVI showed potent in vitro activity against Ent and Psa collected from patients in the CAC and SA subregions of LA. Activity was also good against MEM-NS isolates from SA but was reduced against MEM-NS Ent from CAC that included a high proportion of MBL-positive isolates. The regional and country prevalence of different carbapenem-resistance mechanisms must be considered when evaluating treatment options; however, CAZ-AVI could provide a valuable therapeutic option for treatment of infections caused by Ent and Psa in LA. Disclosures Krystyna Kazmierczak, PhD, IHMA (Employee)Pfizer, Inc. (Consultant) Maria Lavinea Valente, MD, Pfizer Brazil (Employee) Elkin Lemos, MD, PhD, Pfizer Columbia (Employee) Monique Baudrit, MD, MSc, Pfizer Costa Rica (Employee) Alvaro Quintana, MD MSc, Pfizer, Inc. (Employee) Paurus Irani, MD, Pfizer United Kingdom (Employee) Greg Stone, PhD, AztraZeneca (Shareholder, Former Employee)Pfizer, Inc. (Employee) Daniel F. Sahm, PhD, IHMA (Employee)Pfizer, Inc. (Consultant)Shionogi & Co., Ltd. (Independent Contractor)

Download Full-text

693. In Vitro Activity of Ceftazidime–Avibactam and Comparator Agents Against Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa Collected From Patients with Bloodstream Infections as Part of the ATLAS Global Surveillance Program, 2014–2017

Open Forum Infectious Diseases ◽

10.1093/ofid/ofz360.761 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 6 (Supplement_2) ◽

pp. S314-S314

Author(s):

Krystyna Kazmierczak ◽

Gregory Stone ◽

Daniel F Sahm

Keyword(s):

Pseudomonas Aeruginosa ◽

Therapeutic Option ◽

Bloodstream Infections ◽

The United States ◽

Vitro Activity ◽

Asia Pacific ◽

Surveillance Program ◽

In Vitro Activity ◽

Susceptibility Data

Abstract Background Avibactam (AVI) is a β-lactamase inhibitor with potent inhibitory activity against Class A, Class C, and some Class D serine β-lactamases. The combination of ceftazidime (CAZ) with AVI has been approved in Europe and in the United States for several indications. This study evaluated the in vitro activity of CAZ-AVI and comparators against Enterobacteriaceae (Eba) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (Pae) isolates collected from patients with bloodstream infections as part of the ATLAS surveillance program in 2014–2017. Methods A total of 53416 Eba and 15050 Pae nonduplicate clinically significant isolates, including 5155 Eba and 845 Pae isolated from bloodstream infections, were collected by 167 hospital laboratories in 36 countries in Europe, Latin America, Asia/Pacific (excluding China), and the Middle East/Africa region. Susceptibility testing was performed by CLSI broth microdilution. CAZ-AVI was tested at a fixed concentration of 4 µg/mL AVI. Meropenem-nonsusceptible (MEM-NS) Eba and Pae isolates were screened for the presence of β-lactamase genes. Results Susceptibility data are shown in the Table. Percentages of susceptibility (% S) to the tested agents were 0.2–2.8% lower among Eba and Pae from bloodstream infections compared with isolates from combined sources in most cases. CAZ-AVI showed potent in vitro activity against all Eba bloodstream isolates and subsets of CAZ-NS and colistin-resistant (CST-R) isolates (MIC90, 0.5–2 µg/mL, 96.0–100% S). Reduced activity against MEM-NS Eba was attributable to carriage of class B metallo-β-lactamases (MBLs) because all MEM-NS MBL-negative isolates were susceptible to CAZ-AVI. CAZ-AVI also showed good in vitro activity against the majority of Pae bloodstream isolates (MIC90, 16 µg/mL, 89.5% S). Activity was reduced against CAZ-NS, MEM-NS and CST-R subsets (53.7–85.0% S), which included isolates carrying MBLs, but exceeded the activity of CAZ and MEM against these subsets by 15–65%. CST and amikacin were the only tested comparators that demonstrated comparable or greater activity against Pae bloodstream isolates. Conclusion CAZ-AVI provides a valuable therapeutic option for treating bloodstream infections caused by MBL-negative Eba and Pae isolates. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

Download Full-text

1569. In Vitro Activity of Ceftazidime-avibactam and Comparator Agents against Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa Collected from Patients with Bloodstream Infections as Part of the ATLAS Global Surveillance Program, 2015-2018

Open Forum Infectious Diseases ◽

10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.1749 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. S783-S784

Author(s):

Krystyna Kazmierczak ◽

Sibylle Lob ◽

Greg Stone ◽

Daniel F Sahm

Keyword(s):

Pseudomonas Aeruginosa ◽

Therapeutic Option ◽

Bloodstream Infections ◽

The United States ◽

Vitro Activity ◽

Asia Pacific ◽

Surveillance Program ◽

In Vitro Activity ◽

Independent Contractor

Abstract Background Avibactam (AVI) is a β-lactamase inhibitor with potent inhibitory activity against Class A, Class C, and some Class D serine β-lactamases. The combination of ceftazidime (CAZ) with AVI has been approved in Europe and in the United States for several indications. This study evaluated the in vitro activity of CAZ-AVI and comparators against Enterobacterales (Eba) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (Pae) isolates collected from patients with bloodstream infections as part of the ATLAS surveillance program in 2015-2018. Methods A total of 57048 Eba and 15813 Pae non-duplicate clinically significant isolates, including 7720 Eba and 1286 Pae isolated from bloodstream infections, were collected in 52 countries in Europe, Latin America, Asia/Pacific (excluding mainland China), and the Middle East/Africa region. Susceptibility testing was performed by CLSI broth microdilution. CAZ-AVI was tested at a fixed concentration of 4 µg/ml AVI. Meropenem-nonsusceptible (MEM-NS) Eba and Pae isolates were screened for the presence of β-lactamase genes. Results Susceptibility data are shown in the Table. Percentages of susceptibility (% S) to the tested agents were 0.3-2.9% lower among Eba and Pae from bloodstream infections compared to isolates from combined sources in most cases. CAZ-AVI showed potent in vitro activity against all Eba bloodstream isolates and the CAZ-NS subset (MIC90, 0.5-2 µg/ml, 93.4-98.1% S). Reduced activity against MEM-NS Eba was attributable to carriage of class B metallo-β-lactamases (MBLs) because 99% of MEM-NS MBL-negative isolates were susceptible to CAZ-AVI. None of the tested comparators exceeded the activity of CAZ-AVI. CAZ-AVI also showed good in vitro activity against the majority of Pae bloodstream isolates (MIC90, 16 µg/ml, 89.4% S). Activity was reduced against CAZ-NS and MEM-NS subsets (54.2-63.8% S), which included isolates carrying MBLs, but exceeded the activity of CAZ and MEM against these subsets by 26-31 percentage points. Amikacin was the only tested comparator that demonstrated comparable activity against Pae bloodstream isolates. Table Conclusion CAZ-AVI provides a valuable therapeutic option for treating bloodstream infections caused by MBL-negative Eba and Pae isolates. Disclosures Krystyna Kazmierczak, PhD, IHMA (Employee)Pfizer, Inc. (Consultant) Sibylle Lob, PhD, IHMA (Employee)Pfizer, Inc. (Consultant) Greg Stone, PhD, AztraZeneca (Shareholder, Former Employee)Pfizer, Inc. (Employee) Daniel F. Sahm, PhD, IHMA (Employee)Pfizer, Inc. (Consultant)Shionogi & Co., Ltd. (Independent Contractor)

Download Full-text

1570. In Vitro Activity of Ceftazidime-Avibactam and Comparator Agents Against Enterobacterales from ICU and Non-ICU Wards Collected in Latin America and Globally as part of the ATLAS Surveillance Program 2017-2018

Open Forum Infectious Diseases ◽

10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.1750 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. S784-S784

Author(s):

Sibylle Lob ◽

Krystyna Kazmierczak ◽

Greg Stone ◽

Daniel F Sahm

Keyword(s):

Antimicrobial Activity ◽

Latin America ◽

Vitro Activity ◽

Asia Pacific ◽

Surveillance Program ◽

In Vitro Activity ◽

Independent Contractor ◽

Global Average ◽

Valuable Treatment

Abstract Background Ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI) is a β-lactam/non-β-lactam β-lactamase inhibitor combination with activity against Enterobacterales producing class A, C and some class D β-lactamases. Resistance caused by these β-lactamases is especially high in ICUs. This study evaluated the in vitro activity of CAZ-AVI and comparators against Enterobacterales isolates from patients in ICU and non-ICU wards. Methods Non-duplicate clinical isolates were collected in 2017-2018 from patients in Asia/Pacific, Europe, Latin America, and Middle East/Africa. Susceptibility testing was performed using CLSI broth microdilution and interpreted using CLSI 2020 and FDA (tigecycline) breakpoints. PCR and sequencing were used to determine the β-lactamase genes present in all isolates with meropenem (MEM) MIC >1 µg/ml, and Escherichia coli, Klebsiella spp. and Proteus mirabilis with aztreonam or ceftazidime MIC >1 µg/ml. Results The activity of CAZ-AVI and comparators is shown in the table. Susceptibility rates among global Enterobacterales were generally lower for isolates from patients in ICU than non-ICU wards, but this difference was small for CAZ-AVI, which inhibited ≥97% of isolates from both ward types. Among MEM-nonsusceptible (NS) isolates, CAZ-AVI was active against 66.5% and 68.1% of ICU and non-ICU isolates, respectively (of which 31.8% and 30.8%, respectively, carried metallo-β-lactamases [MBLs]). CAZ-AVI inhibited >97% of MEM-NS MBL-negative isolates collected globally. Antimicrobial activity against all Enterobacterales from both ICU and non-ICU wards in Latin America (LA) was generally similar to the global average. Among MEM-NS isolates, antimicrobial activity of CAZ-AVI and TGC was higher in LA than the global average among isolates from both ward types, at least partly because of a lower proportion of MBL-positive isolates in this subset (15.8% and 17.9% in ICU and non-ICUs, respectively). CAZ-AVI inhibited 100% of MEM-NS MBL-negative isolates from LA. Table Conclusion CAZ-AVI provides a valuable treatment option for infections caused by Enterobacterales that do not carry MBLs, including those among patients in ICU wards, where antimicrobial resistance is typically higher. Disclosures Sibylle Lob, PhD, IHMA (Employee)Pfizer, Inc. (Consultant) Krystyna Kazmierczak, PhD, IHMA (Employee)Pfizer, Inc. (Consultant) Greg Stone, PhD, AztraZeneca (Shareholder, Former Employee)Pfizer, Inc. (Employee) Daniel F. Sahm, PhD, IHMA (Employee)Pfizer, Inc. (Consultant)Shionogi & Co., Ltd. (Independent Contractor)

Download Full-text

1358. In vitro Activity of Ceftazidime–Avibactam and Comparator Agents Against Pseudomonas aeruginosa Causing Intra-Abdominal, Lower Respiratory, and Urinary Tract Infections Collected in Latin America as Part of the INFORM Global Surveillance Program, 2012–2016

Open Forum Infectious Diseases ◽

10.1093/ofid/ofy210.1189 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 5 (suppl_1) ◽

pp. S416-S416

Author(s):

Mark Wise ◽

Krystyna Kazmierczak ◽

Gregory G Stone ◽

Dan Sahm

Keyword(s):

Latin America ◽

Urinary Tract ◽

Urinary Tract Infections ◽

Vitro Activity ◽

Surveillance Program ◽

In Vitro Activity ◽

Infection Types ◽

Tract Infections ◽

Abdominal Infections

Abstract Background The non-β-lactam β-lactamase inhibitor avibactam (AVI) is active against class A, C, and some class D β-lactamases, in combination with ceftazidime (CAZ) has been approved by the FDA and EMA for treatment of intra-abdominal infections (IAI), lower respiratory tract infections (LRTI), and urinary tract infections (UTI). This study reports on the in vitro activity of (CAZ-AVI) and comparators vs. P. aeruginosa collected from IAIs, LRTIs, and UTIs in Latin America as part of the INFORM surveillance study from 2012 to 2016. Methods For INFORM surveillance over 2012–2016 in Latin America, 1,595 nonduplicate P. aeruginosa isolates linked to IAIs, LRTIs, and UTIs were collected from 26 clinical sites in six countries. Susceptibility testing was done using broth microdilution according to CLSI guidelines and using CLSI 2018 breakpoints. CAZ was tested with AVI at a fixed concentration of 4 mg/mL. Meropenem (MEM) nonsusceptible organisms were screened for β-lactamase genes by PCR. Results Among the full collection of P. aeruginosa, CAZ-AVI showed consistently higher % susceptibilities than all comparators except for colistin (CST) for all infection sources. The addition of AVI to CAZ resulted in an increase in susceptibility ranging from 14.2% (IAI) to 19.5% (UTI). Against the non-metallo-β-lactamase (MBL) harboring subset, CAZ-AVI showed extremely potent activity (MIC90, 8 mg/mL) for all infection sources. In this subset, the activity of CAZ-AVI approached that of colistin for IAIs (susceptibility of 93.3% vs. 96.4%, respectively). Conclusion CAZ-AVI demonstrated very good in vitro activity against P. aeruginosa isolates, especially those without MBLs. More isolates were susceptible to CAZ-AVI than to MEM for all infection types. Disclosures M. Wise, Pfizer Inc.: Consultant, Consulting fee. IHMA, Inc.: Employee, Salary. K. Kazmierczak, Pfizer Inc.: Consultant, Consulting fee. IHMA, Inc.: Employee, Salary. G. G. Stone, Pfizer Inc.: Employee, Salary. AstraZeneca: Former Employee and Shareholder, Salary. D. Sahm, Pfizer Inc.: Consultant, Consulting fee. IHMA, Inc.: Employee, Salary.

Download Full-text