scholarly journals Combination of Chemotaxis and Differential Adhesion Leads to Robust Cell Sorting During Tissue Patterning

2014 ◽  
Vol 106 (2) ◽  
pp. 173a
Author(s):  
Rui Zhen Tan ◽  
Keng-Hwee Chiam
PLoS ONE ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 6 (10) ◽  
pp. e24999 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ying Zhang ◽  
Gilberto L. Thomas ◽  
Maciej Swat ◽  
Abbas Shirinifard ◽  
James A. Glazier

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marc Durand

Cell sorting, whereby a heterogeneous cell mixture segregates and forms distinct homogeneous tissues, is one of the main collective cell behaviors at work during development. Although differences in interfacial energies are recognized to be a possible driving source for cell sorting, no clear consensus has emerged on the kinetic law of cell sorting driven by differential adhesion. Using a modified Cellular Potts Model algorithm that allows for efficient simulations while preserving the connectivity of cells, we numerically explore cell-sorting dynamics over unprecedentedly large scales in space and time. For a binary mixture of cells surrounded by a medium, increase of domain size follows a power-law with exponent n = 1/4 independently of the mixture ratio, revealing that the kinetics is dominated by the diffusion and coalescence of rounded domains. We compare these results with recent numerical and experimental studies on cell sorting, and discuss the importance of boundary conditions, space dimension, initial cluster geometry, and finite size effects on the observed scaling.


Entropy ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (11) ◽  
pp. 1378
Author(s):  
Philipp Rossbach ◽  
Hans-Joachim Böhme ◽  
Steffen Lange ◽  
Anja Voss-Böhme

The process of cell-sorting is essential for development and maintenance of tissues. Mathematical modeling can provide the means to analyze the consequences of different hypotheses about the underlying mechanisms. With the Differential Adhesion Hypothesis, Steinberg proposed that cell-sorting is determined by quantitative differences in cell-type-specific intercellular adhesion strengths. An implementation of the Differential Adhesion Hypothesis is the Differential Migration Model by Voss-Böhme and Deutsch. There, an effective adhesion parameter was derived analytically for systems with two cell types, which predicts the asymptotic sorting pattern. However, the existence and form of such a parameter for more than two cell types is unclear. Here, we generalize analytically the concept of an effective adhesion parameter to three and more cell types and demonstrate its existence numerically for three cell types based on in silico time-series data that is produced by a cellular-automaton implementation of the Differential Migration Model. Additionally, we classify the segregation behavior using statistical learning methods and show that the estimated effective adhesion parameter for three cell types matches our analytical prediction. Finally, we demonstrate that the effective adhesion parameter can resolve a recent dispute about the impact of interfacial adhesion, cortical tension and heterotypic repulsion on cell segregation.


2012 ◽  
Vol 23 (01) ◽  
pp. 93-126 ◽  
Author(s):  
GREG LEMON ◽  
JOHN R. KING

This paper presents a mathematical model to describe the sorting of two different types of cells, arising from differential adhesion mechanisms within biological tissue. The model is based on a continuum approach that takes into account individual cell behavior including aspects of the cell-migration process, dynamics of the adhesions between contacting cells, and finite cell size. Numerical solutions and bifurcation analyses for the case of a collection of two different cell types show a variety of behaviors observed in experiments, including spatially uniform mixing of cells and the formation of two distinct, containing both types of cells or just one. The mathematical model, which is in the form of a set of functional differential equations, represents a novel approach to continuum modeling of cell sorting and migration within biological tissue.


1995 ◽  
Vol 75 (11) ◽  
pp. 2244-2247 ◽  
Author(s):  
José C. M. Mombach ◽  
James A. Glazier ◽  
Richard C. Raphael ◽  
Mark Zajac

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document