scholarly journals Endometrial Polyps and Abnormal Uterine Bleeding (AUB-P): What is the relationship, how are they diagnosed and how are they treated?

2017 ◽  
Vol 40 ◽  
pp. 89-104 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Justin Clark ◽  
Helen Stevenson
Keyword(s):  
Abnormal Uterine Bleeding ◽  
Uterine Bleeding ◽  
Endometrial Polyps ◽  
The Relationship

Etiological structure and diagnosis of abnormal uterine bleeding

GYNECOLOGY ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 14-17
Author(s):  
G E Chernukha ◽  
I A Ivanov ◽  
Z N Efendieva ◽  
M R Dumanovskaya ◽  
A V Asaturova
Keyword(s):  
Diagnostic Accuracy ◽  
Endometrial Hyperplasia ◽  
Ultrasound Examination ◽  
Abnormal Uterine Bleeding ◽  
Uterine Bleeding ◽  
Histological Diagnosis ◽  
Reproductive Age ◽  
Endometrial Polyps ◽  
Chronic Endometritis ◽  
Endometrial Pathology

Abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) is one of the most common indications for hysteroscopy. Most of the AUB cases occur due to endometrial or myometrium pathology. Among it, endometrial polyps (EP) and chronic endometritis (CE) prevalent in reproductive age, while endometrial hyperplasia (EH) and EP dominate in perimenopause. It was determined that EP and CE are characterized with menorrhagia and metrorrhagia approximately equally, whereas EH reveals AUB with oligomenorrhoea. Verification of exact endometrial pathology by ultrasound examination is hindered, that results in deviations of ultrasound and histological diagnosis. The usage of ultrasound data and AUB’s characteristics may improve the diagnostic accuracy on preadmission period.

The assessment of the relationship between the vascularity of FIGO Type 4–7 leiomyomas and abnormal uterine bleeding

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-5
Author(s):  
Asli Yarci Gursoy ◽  
Didem Cakmak ◽  
Gulsah Akgul ◽  
Mine Kiseli ◽  
Haldun Umudum ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Abnormal Uterine Bleeding ◽  
Uterine Bleeding ◽  
The Relationship

scholarly journals Endometrial Volume Measured by VOCAL Compared to Office Hysteroscopy for Diagnosis of Endometrial Polyps in Premenopausal Women with Abnormal Uterine Bleeding

2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohamed Laban ◽  
Sherif H. Hussain ◽  
Alaa S. Hassanin ◽  
Waleed M. Khalaf ◽  
Mohamed K. Etman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Endometrial Thickness ◽  
Transvaginal Ultrasound ◽  
Premenopausal Women ◽  
Abnormal Uterine Bleeding ◽  
Final Analysis ◽  
Uterine Bleeding ◽  
Endometrial Polyps ◽  
Predictive Values ◽  
Endometrial Volume ◽  
Sensitivity Specificity

The aim is to compare hysteroscopy, two-dimensional transvaginal ultrasound (2D TVUS), and three-dimensional (3D) Virtual Organ Computer-aided AnaLysis™ (VOCAL) to detect endometrial polyps (EPs) in premenopausal women with abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB). This prospective study was done at Ain Shams Maternity Hospital, Egypt, from March 5, 2015, to December 30, 2015, enrolling 118 premenopausal women with AUB. 2D TVUS, 3D VOCAL, and hysteroscopy were done. 109 patients reached final analysis. 36 women (33%) were diagnosed with EP by 2D TVUS. 50 (45.9%) had EP by hysteroscopy. Endometrial thickness was 10.1 mm by 2D TVUS and endometrial volume was 4.92 mL by VOCAL in women with EP by hysteroscopy compared to 9.9 mm and 3.50 mL in women with no EP, respectively (P=0.223;P=0.06). 2D TVUS has sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of 54%, 84.7%, 75%, and 68.5%, respectively. Endometrial thickness of >7.5 mm has sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and overall accuracy of 82%, 37.3%, 52.6%, 71%, and 57.8%, respectively. Endometrial volume of >1.2 mL has sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and overall accuracy of 90%, 42.4%, 57%, 83.3%, and 64.2%, respectively. 3D VOCAL may be used as a noninvasive method for the diagnosis of EP in premenopausal women with AUB.

scholarly journals Hysteroscopic evaluation in infertility and abnormal uterine bleeding

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 612
Author(s):  
Navneet Kaur ◽  
Ruby Bhatia ◽  
Paramjit Kaur ◽  
Surinder K. Bhopal
Keyword(s):  
Endometrial Hyperplasia ◽  
Uterine Cavity ◽  
Invasive Procedure ◽  
Abnormal Uterine Bleeding ◽  
Endometrial Biopsy ◽  
Uterine Bleeding ◽  
Therapeutic Modality ◽  
Secondary Infertility ◽  
Endometrial Polyps ◽  
Submucous Fibroid

Background: Hysteroscopy an endoscopic procedure for visualization of uterine cavity may be extensively used in both primary and secondary infertility and abnormal uterine bleeding for evaluating intrauterine pathology. The objectives of this study were to visualize and identity intrauterine pathology in both primary and secondary infertility and abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) by hysteroscopic evaluation and to perform hysteroscopic guided therapeutic procedures like endometrial currettage, polypectomy, adhesiolysis.Methods: Hysteroscopic evaluation of uterine cavity for any intrauterine pathology in AUB and Infertility. Adhesiolysis, polypectomy, endometrial biopsy misplaced copper T removal were carried out under hysteroscopic vision.Results: Intrauterine synechia in 20.51%, Submucous fibroid in 5.13%, bicornuate uterus, endometrial hyperplasia and endometrial polyp were seen in 2.56% patient each were detected in infertility group while 81.95% cases with AUB had abnormal intrauterine pathology commonest being endometrial hyperplasia in 33.33% followed by endometrial polyps in 23.81% cases, submucous fibroid and misplaced copper T in 9.52% each and intrauterine synechia in 4.76% patient. Endometrial biopsy and polypectomy was done in 23.80% each with AUB, misplaced copper T removal in 9.52% and adhesiolysis in 4.76% patient with AUB.Conclusions: Hysteroscopy remains gold standard for evaluating intrauterine lesions in abnormal uterine bleeding and infertility. A safe, simple minimally invasive procedure not only diagnostic but therapeutic modality for adhesiolysis, endometrial biopsy/curettage, polypectomy, misplaced copper T removal under direct vision with minimal complication within reach of every Gynaecologist thereby reducing burden of major surgical intervention.

scholarly journals Prevalence and characteristics of endometrial polyps in patients with abnormal uterine bleeding

2008 ◽  
Vol 65 (5) ◽  
pp. 349-352 ◽  
Author(s):  
Biljana Djordjevic ◽  
Jelena Milosevic ◽  
Zorica Stanojevic
Keyword(s):  
Endometrial Carcinoma ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Abnormal Uterine Bleeding ◽  
Uterine Bleeding ◽  
Atypical Hyperplasia ◽  
Endometrial Polyps ◽  
Female Population ◽  
Group A ◽  
Malignant Changes ◽  
Group B

Background/Aim. The prevalence of endometrial polyps (EPs) in the general female population is about 24%. Abnormal uterine bleeding is frequently the presenting symptom of EPs. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence and characteristics of EPs in patients with abnormal uterine bleeding. Methods. The prevalence and characteristics of EPs were investigated in 961 patients with abnormal uterine bleeding who underwent dilatation and curettage between January and December 2006. Regarding histopathological features of EPs (presence of atypical hyperplasia or endometrial carcinoma), patients were divided into two groups: group A - patients who had EPs and EPs with hyperplasia without atypia (n = 204) and group B - patients who had EPs with atypical hyperplasia and EPs with carcinoma (n = 7). Results. In 211 (21.94%) patients EPs were found with abnormal uterine bleeding. Histopathologically, there were 175 (82.94%) EPs, 29 (13.74%) EPs with hyperplasia without atypia, 5 (2.37%) EPs with atypical hyperplasia, and 2 (0.95%) EPs with endometrial carcinoma. Contrary to the patients with EPs and EPs with hyperplasia without atypia (group A), patients who had EPs with atypical hyperplasia and EPs with carcinoma (group B) were older (p < 0.05), and more commonly postmenopausal (p < 0.05) and with hypertension (p < 0.05), all of statistical significance. Conclusion. The prevalence of endometrial polyps in patients with abnormal uterine bleeding according to our data was 21.95%. Atypical hyperplasia and endometrial carcinoma were rarely confined to a polyp. Older age, postmenopausal period and hypertension may increase the risk of premalignant and malignant changes in endometrial polyps.

scholarly journals Role of hysteroscopy and histopathology in evaluating patients with abnormal uterine bleeding

2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 615 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nighat Firdous ◽  
Samar Mukhtar ◽  
Sheikh Bilal ◽  
Salma Kounsar Beigh
Keyword(s):  
Predictive Value ◽  
Endometrial Hyperplasia ◽  
Abnormal Uterine Bleeding ◽  
Uterine Bleeding ◽  
Common Finding ◽  
Endometrial Polyps ◽  
Medical College ◽  
Obstetrics And Gynaecology ◽  
Definitive Role

Background: Abnormal uterine bleeding is one of the leading causes for seeking gynaecological advice. The aim and objectives of the study was to determine the pattern of hysteroscopic abnormalities and histopathological features of Abnormal Uterine Bleeding and to correlate hysteroscopic findings with histopathological findings.Methods: The present study “Role of Hysteroscopy and Histopathology in Evaluating patients with Abnormal Uterine Bleeding” was an observational study carried out in the Postgraduate Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology and Postgraduate Department of Pathology of Government Medical college, Srinagar after obtaining clearance from the institutional ethical committee. The period of the study was One and a Half Years from April 2014 to September 2015.Results: The most common abnormality detected by hysteroscopy was Endometrial Hyperplasia (27 cases, 27%) followed by endometrial polyps (21 cases, 21%). Endometrial Hyperplasia was the most common abnormality found in Menorrhagia followed by polyps while polyps were the most common finding in polymenorrhea and endometrial hyperplasia was the most common pathology in postmenopausal bleeding. Hysteroscopy had a sensitivity of 93.2%, specificity of 83.9%, positive predictive value of 82%, Negative Predictive Value of 94% in diagnosing etiology of abnormal uterine bleeding.Conclusions: This study confirms that hysteroscopy has a definitive role in evaluating patients with abnormal uterine bleeding and hysteroscopy and histopathology complement each other in the evaluation of a patient with Abnormal uterine bleeding.

scholarly journals To compare trans-vaginal ultrasound colour doppler (TUCD) with hysteroscopy and guided endometrial biopsy in diagnosing abnormal uterine bleeding

2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (7) ◽  
pp. 3035
Author(s):  
Swati Choudhary ◽  
Syed Nawaz Ahmad ◽  
Shefali Agarwal
Keyword(s):  
Endometrial Carcinoma ◽  
Abnormal Uterine Bleeding ◽  
Diagnostic Procedures ◽  
Endometrial Biopsy ◽  
Uterine Bleeding ◽  
Kappa Statistics ◽  
Colour Doppler ◽  
Endometrial Polyps ◽  
Vaginal Ultrasound ◽  
Postmenopausal Female

Background: To compare trans-vaginal ultrasound Colour Doppler (TUCD) with hysteroscopy and guided endometrial biopsy in diagnosing abnormal uterine bleeding.Methods: A total of 50 consecutive and haemodynamically stable patients aged more than 40 years with abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) were included in the study. Patients with pregnancy and probable cervical malignancy were excluded. All the patients were subjected to TUCD followed by hysteroscopic directed endometrial biopsy during the follicular phase of the menstrual cycle between 7th and 11th day to diagnose the underlying pathology. In postmenopausal female both TUCD and hysteroscopy were performed on any day. Results of both the procedures were compared.Results: The sensitivity and specificity of TUCD as compared to hysteroscopy in diagnosing polyp was found out to be 27.78% and 100%; for fibroid 100% and 84.4%; for endometrial hyperplasia 86.36% and 96.43%; for endometrial carcinoma 71.43% and 100%; and for endometrial atrophy 100% and 100%, respectively. After application of kappa statistics, the degree of agreement between the two diagnostic procedures was found to be 0.599 which was considered to be good.Conclusions: Conditions like fibroid, endometrial atrophy and cases of A-V malformation are better diagnosed with TUCD, while others like endometrial polyps, endometrial carcinoma are better detected on hysteroscopy. TUCD can diagnose most of the pathologies but not all, so it can be used as an adjunct to hysteroscopy to diagnose endometrial pathology, but can surely not replace hysteroscopy.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document