Predicting cognitive behavioral therapy outcome in the outpatient sector based on clinical routine data: A machine learning approach

2020 ◽  
Vol 124 ◽  
pp. 103530 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin Hilbert ◽  
Stefanie L. Kunas ◽  
Ulrike Lueken ◽  
Norbert Kathmann ◽  
Thomas Fydrich ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Meelim Kim ◽  
Jaeyeong Yang ◽  
Woo-Young Ahn ◽  
Hyung Jin Choi

BACKGROUND The digital healthcare community has been urged to enhance engagement and clinical outcomes by analyzing multidimensional digital phenotypes. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to investigate the performance of multivariate phenotypes predicting the engagement rate and health outcomes of digital cognitive behavioral therapy (dCBT) using a machine learning approach. METHODS We leveraged both conventional phenotypes assessed by validated psychological questionnaires and multidimensional digital phenotypes within time-series data from a mobile app of 45 participants undergoing digital cognitive behavioral therapy (dCBT) for eight weeks. To discriminate the important characteristics, we conducted a machine-learning analysis. RESULTS A higher engagement rate was associated with higher weight loss at 8 weeks (r = -0.59, p < 0001) and 24 weeks (r = -0.52, p = 0001). The machine learning approach revealed distinct multivariate profiles associated with varying impacts on the outcomes. Lower self-esteem on the conventional phenotype and higher in-app motivational measures on digital phenotypes commonly accounted for both engagement and health outcomes. In addition, eight types of digital phenotypes predicted engagement rates (mean R2 = 0416, SD = 0006). The prediction of short-term weight change (mean R2 = 0382, SD = 0015) was associated with six different digital phenotypes. Lastly, two behavioral measures of digital phenotypes were associated with a long-term weight change (mean R2 = 0590, SD = 0011). CONCLUSIONS Our findings successfully demonstrated how multiple psychological constructs, such as emotional, cognitive, behavioral, and motivational phenotypes, elucidate the mechanisms and clinical efficacy of digital intervention with the machine learning method. Our results also highlight the importance of assessing multiple aspects of motivation before and during the intervention to improve both engagement rate and clinical outcomes. This line of research may shed light on the development of advanced prevention and personalized digital therapeutics. CLINICALTRIAL ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03465306 (Retrieved September 18, 2017, https://register.clinicaltrials.gov/NCT03465306)


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Oskar Flygare ◽  
Jesper Enander ◽  
Erik Andersson ◽  
Brjánn Ljótsson ◽  
Volen Z Ivanov ◽  
...  

**Background:** Previous attempts to identify predictors of treatment outcomes in body dysmorphic disorder (BDD) have yielded inconsistent findings. One way to increase precision and clinical utility could be to use machine learning methods, which can incorporate multiple non-linear associations in prediction models. **Methods:** This study used a random forests machine learning approach to test if it is possible to reliably predict remission from BDD in a sample of 88 individuals that had received internet-delivered cognitive behavioral therapy for BDD. The random forest models were compared to traditional logistic regression analyses. **Results:** Random forests correctly identified 78% of participants as remitters or non-remitters at post-treatment. The accuracy of prediction was lower in subsequent follow-ups (68%, 66% and 61% correctly classified at 3-, 12- and 24-month follow-ups, respectively). Depressive symptoms, treatment credibility, working alliance, and initial severity of BDD were among the most important predictors at the beginning of treatment. By contrast, the logistic regression models did not identify consistent and strong predictors of remission from BDD. **Conclusions:** The results provide initial support for the clinical utility of machine learning approaches in the prediction of outcomes of patients with BDD. **Trial registration:** ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT02010619.


2001 ◽  
Vol 69 (5) ◽  
pp. 747-755 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan D. Huppert ◽  
Lynn F. Bufka ◽  
David H. Barlow ◽  
Jack M. Gorman ◽  
M. Katherine Shear ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 51 (9) ◽  
pp. 526-532 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carol B. Peterson ◽  
Ross D. Crosby ◽  
Stephen A. Wonderlich ◽  
James E. Mitchell ◽  
Scott J. Crow ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document