Different Modulation Mechanisms on Functional Motor Network between High and Low Frequency rTMS in Stroke Patients with Motor Dysfunction

2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 416
Author(s):  
Q. Mu ◽  
Z. Guo ◽  
C. Yang
Brain Injury ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 25 (5) ◽  
pp. 496-502 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wataru Kakuda ◽  
Masahiro Abo ◽  
Kazushige Kobayashi ◽  
Ryo Momosaki ◽  
Aki Yokoi ◽  
...  

PLoS ONE ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 9 (7) ◽  
pp. e102557 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cai-Li Ren ◽  
Guo-Fu Zhang ◽  
Nan Xia ◽  
Chun-Hui Jin ◽  
Xiu-Hua Zhang ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 42 (4) ◽  
pp. 521-527 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joo Won Park ◽  
Sang Beom Kim ◽  
Kyeong Woo Lee ◽  
Jong Hwa Lee ◽  
Jin Gee Park ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 125-139 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ning Zhao ◽  
Jingna Zhang ◽  
Mingguo Qiu ◽  
Chunrong Wang ◽  
Yun Xiang ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-11
Author(s):  
Zhiwei Guo ◽  
Yu Jin ◽  
Xi Bai ◽  
Binghu Jiang ◽  
Lin He ◽  
...  

Objective. To investigate the functional reorganization of the motor network after repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in stroke patients with motor dysfunction and the distinction between high-frequency rTMS (HF-rTMS) and low-frequency rTMS (LF-rTMS). Methods. Thirty-three subcortical stroke patients were enrolled and assigned to the HF-rTMS group, LF-rTMS group, and sham group. Each patient of rTMS groups received either 10.0 Hz rTMS over the ipsilesional primary motor cortex (M1) or 1.0 Hz rTMS over the contralesional M1 for 10 consecutive days. A resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) scan and neurological examinations were performed at baseline and after rTMS. The motor network and functional connectivities intramotor network with the core brain regions including the bilateral M1, premotor area (PMA), and supplementary motor area (SMA) were calculated. Comparisons of functional connectivities and Pearson correlation analysis between functional connectivity changes and behavioral improvement were calculated. Results. Significant motor improvement was found after rTMS in all groups which was larger in two rTMS groups than in the sham group. The functional connectivities of the motor network were significantly increased in bilateral M1, SMA, and contralesional PMA after real rTMS. These changes were only detected in the regions of the ipsilesional hemisphere in the HF-rTMS group and in the regions of the contralesional hemisphere in the LF-rTMS group. Significantly changed functional connectivities of the intramotor network were found between the ipsilesional M1 and SMA and contralesional PMA, between contralesional M1 and contralesional SMA, between contralesional SMA and ipsilesional SMA and contralesional PMA in the HF-rTMS group in which the changed connectivity between ipsilesional M1 and contralesional PMA was obviously correlated with the motor improvement. In addition, the functional connectivity of the intramotor network between ipsilesional M1 and contralesional PMA was significantly higher in the HF-rTMS group than in the LF-rTMS group. Conclusion. Both HF-rTMS and LF-rTMS have a positive effect on motor recovery in patients with subcortical stroke and could promote the reorganization of the motor network. HF-rTMS may contribute more to the functional connectivity reorganization of the ipsilesional motor network and realize greater benefit to the motor recovery.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document