Degasification system selection for US longwall mines using an expert classification system

2009 ◽  
Vol 35 (3) ◽  
pp. 515-526 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Özgen Karacan
2013 ◽  
Vol 14 (01) ◽  
pp. 1350003 ◽  
Author(s):  
CHUN-YI LIU ◽  
CHUAN-YI TANG ◽  
D. FRANK HSU

Combining multiple information retrieval (IR) systems has been shown to improve performance over individual systems. However, it remains a challenging problem to determine when and how a set of individual systems should to be combined. In this paper, we investigate these issues using combinatorial fusion analysis and five data sets provide by TREC 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6. In particular, we compare the performance of combining six IR systems selected by random choice vs. by performance measurement from these five TREC data sets. Two experiments are conducted, which include: (1) combination of two systems and their performance outcome in terms of performance ratio and cognitive diversity, and (2) combinatorial fusion of t-systems, t = 2 to 6, using both score and rank combinations and exploration of the effect of diversity on the performance outcome. It is demonstrated in both experiments that combination of two or more systems improves the performance more significantly when the systems are selected by performance evaluation than those selected by random choice. Our work provides a distinctive method of system selection for the combination of multiple retrieval systems.


2003 ◽  
Author(s):  
Phil Snider ◽  
Chuck Rindels ◽  
Kent Folse ◽  
John Hardesty ◽  
Nathan Clark

2015 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 61-70
Author(s):  
Hermanto Hermanto

One of the elements in the selection of the “ITS Heroes 2015” to be the candidates for National Selection for Student Competition (Mawapres) is the ability of the participants to communicate in English in the form of writing and speaking performance. In the writing performance, the participants must submit an English abstract of their papers, and in the speaking performance, the participants are required to tell themselves in English. From these two evaluation items, the abstract is more interesting to analyze in terms of the writing errors the participants made in it. This paper presents the analysis of the common writing errors made by the participants of “ITS Heroes 2015”. The errors are categorized and analyzed based on the checklist items by adopting Kim (2009)’s error classification system, which is based on Dulay, Burt, and Krashen’s classification system.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document