scholarly journals Novel Application of Milrinone in the Evaluation of Classical Low-Flow, Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis

CASE ◽  
2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arunima Kaul ◽  
Juliet Yirerong ◽  
Chinmaya Sharma ◽  
Hope Campbell ◽  
Gyanendra Sharma
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Stenosis ◽  
Low Flow

scholarly journals Use and success evaluation of percutaneous aortic balloon valvuloplasty in different hemodynamic entities of severe aortic stenosis in the TAVR era

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
K Piayda ◽  
A Wimmer ◽  
H Sievert ◽  
K Hellhammer ◽  
S Afzal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Aortic Valve ◽  
Aortic Stenosis ◽  
Aortic Valve Replacement ◽  
Pressure Gradient ◽  
Severe Aortic Stenosis ◽  
Primary Treatment ◽  
Low Flow ◽  
Mean Pressure ◽  
The Mean

Abstract Background In the era of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), there is renewed interest in percutaneous balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV), which may qualify as the primary treatment option of choice in special clinical situations. Success of BAV is commonly defined as a significant mean pressure gradient reduction after the procedure. Purpose To evaluate the correlation of the mean pressure gradient reduction and increase in the aortic valve area (AVA) in different flow and gradient patterns of severe aortic stenosis (AS). Methods Consecutive patients from 01/2010 to 03/2018 undergoing BAV were divided into normal-flow high-gradient (NFHG), low-flow low-gradient (LFLG) and paradoxical low-flow low-gradient (pLFLG) AS. Baseline characteristics, hemodynamic and clinical information were collected and compared. Additionally, the clinical pathway of patients (BAV as a stand-alone procedure or BAV as a bridge to aortic valve replacement) was followed-up. Results One-hundred-fifty-six patients were grouped into NFHG (n=68, 43.5%), LFLG (n=68, 43.5%) and pLFLG (n=20, 12.8%) AS. Underlying reasons for BAV and not TAVR/SAVR as the primary treatment option are displayed in Figure 1. Spearman correlation revealed that the mean pressure gradient reduction had a moderate correlation with the increase in the AVA in patients with NFHG AS (r: 0.529, p<0.001) but showed no association in patients with LFLG (r: 0.145, p=0.239) and pLFLG (r: 0.030, p=0.889) AS. Underlying reasons for patients to undergo BAV and not TAVR/SAVR varied between groups, however cardiogenic shock or refractory heart failure (overall 46.8%) were the most common ones. After the procedure, independent of the hemodynamic AS entity, patients showed a functional improvement, represented by substantially lower NYHA class levels (p<0.001), lower NT-pro BNP levels (p=0.003) and a numerical but non-significant improvement in other echocardiographic parameters like the left ventricular ejection fraction (p=0.163) and tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE, p=0.066). An unplanned cardiac re-admission due to heart failure was necessary in 23.7% patients. Less than half of the patients (44.2%) received BAV as a bridge to TAVR/SAVR (median time to bridge 64 days). Survival was significantly increased in patients having BAV as a staged procedure (log-rank p<0.001). Conclusion In daily clinical practice, the mean pressure gradient reduction might be an adequate surrogate of BAV success in patients with NFHG AS but is not suitable for patients with other hemodynamic entities of AS. In those patients, TTE should be directly performed in the catheter laboratory to correctly assess the increase of the AVA. BAV as a staged procedure in selected clinical scenarios increases survival and is a considerable option in all flow states of severe AS. (NCT04053192) Figure 1 Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

scholarly journals Impact of the Trifecta bioprosthetic valve in patients with low-flow severe aortic stenosis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tohru Takaseya ◽  
Atsunobu Oryoji ◽  
Kazuyoshi Takagi ◽  
Tomofumi Fukuda ◽  
Koichi Arinaga ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Valve ◽  
Aortic Stenosis ◽  
Severe Aortic Stenosis ◽  
Stroke Volume Index ◽  
Low Flow ◽  
Volume Index ◽  
Effective Orifice Area ◽  
Aortic Valve Area ◽  
Hemodynamic Performance ◽  
Mid Term Results

AbstractAortic stenosis (AS) is the most common valve disorder in advanced age. Previous reports have shown that low-flow status of the left ventricle is an independent predictor of cardiovascular mortality after surgery. The Trifecta bioprosthesis has recently shown favorable hemodynamic performance. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of the Trifecta bioprosthesis, which has a large effective orifice area, in patients with low-flow severe AS who have a poor prognosis. We retrospectively evaluated 94 consecutive patients with severe AS who underwent aortic valve replacement (AVR). Patients were divided into two groups according to the stroke volume index (SVI): low-flow (LF) group (SVI < 35 ml/m2, n = 22) and normal-flow (NF) group (SVI ≥ 35 ml/m2, n = 72). Patients’ characteristics and early and mid-term results were compared between the two groups. There were no differences in patients’ characteristics, except for systolic blood pressure (LF:NF = 120:138 mmHg, p < 0.01) and the rate of atrial fibrillation between the groups. A preoperative echocardiogram showed that the pressure gradient was higher in the NF group than in the LF group, but aortic valve area was similar. The Trifecta bioprosthesis size was similar in both groups. The operative outcomes were not different between the groups. Severe patient–prosthesis mismatch (PPM) (< 0.65 cm2/m2) was not observed in either of the groups. There were no significant differences in mid-term results between the two groups. The favorable hemodynamic performance of the Trifecta bioprosthesis appears to have the similar outcomes in the LF and NF groups. AVR with the Trifecta bioprosthesis should be considered for avoidance of PPM, particularly in AS patients with LV dysfunction.

True-severe stenosis in paradoxical low-flow low-gradient aortic stenosis: outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve replacement

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Taishi Okuno ◽  
Noé Corpataux ◽  
Giancarlo Spano ◽  
Christoph Gräni ◽  
Dik Heg ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Valve ◽  
Aortic Stenosis ◽  
Aortic Valve Replacement ◽  
Functional Status ◽  
Valve Replacement ◽  
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement ◽  
Low Flow ◽  
Aortic Valve Area ◽  
High Gradient ◽  
Transcatheter Aortic Valve

Abstract Aims The ESC/EACTS guidelines propose criteria that determine the likelihood of true-severe aortic stenosis (AS). We aimed to investigate the impact of the guideline-based criteria of the likelihood of true-severe AS in patients with low-flow low-gradient (LFLG) AS with preserved ejection fraction (pEF) on outcomes following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Methods and results In a prospective TAVR registry, LFLG-AS patients with pEF were retrospectively categorized into high (criteria ≥6) and intermediate (criteria &lt;6) likelihood of true-severe AS. Haemodynamic, functional, and clinical outcomes were compared with high-gradient AS patients with pEF. Among 632 eligible patients, 202 fulfilled diagnostic criteria for LFLG-AS. Significant haemodynamic improvement after TAVR was observed in LFLG-AS patients, irrespective of the likelihood. Although &gt;70% of LFLG-AS patients had functional improvement, impaired functional status [New York Heart Association (NYHA III/IV)] persisted more frequently at 1 year in LFLG-AS than in high-gradient AS patients (7.8%), irrespective of the likelihood (high: 17.4%, P = 0.006; intermediate: 21.1%, P &lt; 0.001). All-cause death at 1 year occurred in 6.6% of high-gradient AS patients, 10.9% of LFLG-AS patients with high likelihood [hazard ratio (HR)adj 1.43, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.68–3.02], and in 7.2% of those with intermediate likelihood (HRadj 0.92, 95% CI 0.39–2.18). Among the criteria, only the absence of aortic valve area ≤0.8 cm2 emerged as an independent predictor of treatment futility, a combined endpoint of all-cause death or NYHA III/IV at 1 year (OR 2.70, 95% CI 1.14–6.25). Conclusion Patients with LFLG-AS with pEF had comparable survival but worse functional status at 1 year than high-gradient AS with pEF, irrespective of the likelihood of true-severe AS. Clinical Trial Registration https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. NCT01368250.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document