An open-label, non-inferiority randomized controlled trial of lidocAine Versus Opioids In MyocarDial Infarction study (AVOID-2 study) methods paper

2021 ◽  
Vol 105 ◽  
pp. 106411
Author(s):  
Himawan Fernando ◽  
Catherine Milne ◽  
Ziad Nehme ◽  
Jocasta Ball ◽  
Stephen Bernard ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Study Methods ◽  
Randomized Controlled

P3350Design of a multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled trial: effects of intensive systolic blood pressure lowering treatment in reducing risk of vascular events (ESPRIT)

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
J Liu ◽  
J Li ◽  
X H Huang
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Cardiovascular Disease ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Cardiovascular Events ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Elevated Blood ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Major Cardiovascular Events

Abstract Background Patients with cardiovascular diseases (CVD) are at high risk for recurrent major cardiovascular events. Effective public health strategies to lower blood pressure (BP) are necessary to reduce risk of cardiovascular disease. However, substantial uncertainty remains about the optimal target level to lower BP in patients with cardiovascular disease. Purpose To assess the effects on the incidence of major cardiovascular events in patients with CVD during the scheduled treatment period of greater reduction in blood pressure with a systolic BP (SBP) target <120 mmHg versus <140 mmHg. Methods This study is a multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled trial comparing two strategies for lowering SBP: lowering SBP to the standard target of <140 mmHg; and lowering BP to a more intensive target of <120 mmHg. This study will enroll 12,000 Chinese participants from 100–200 hospitals, follow-up for about 3 years. We will include participants aged ≥50 years old with SBP ≥130 mmHg, having a history of vascular disease (including myocardial infarction, percutaneous coronary intervention, coronary artery bypass grafting, carotid endarterectomy or carotid stenting, peripheral artery disease with revascularization, abdominal aortic aneurysm ≥5 cm with repair) or stroke. The primary outcome is the first occurrence of major cardiovascular events defined as a composite of myocardial infarction, stroke, coronary or non-coronary revascularization events, and cardiovascular death. Secondary outcomes include the components of the primary composite outcome, hospitalized heart failure and all cause of death and non-cardiovascular outcomes (kidney disease and cognitive outcomes). Results Regarding the results, we hypothesize that comparing with SBP target of <140 mmHg, more intensive SBP target of <120 mmHg can further reduce the occurrence of cardiovascular events in CVD patients with elevated blood pressure. Conclusion This study can provide reliable evaluation on whether more intensive SBP target of <120 mmHg is more desirable than SBP target of <140 mmHg in CVD patients with elevated blood pressure.

Investigating the Impact of Cognitive Training for Individuals With Bothersome Tinnitus: A Randomized Controlled Trial

2021 ◽  
pp. 019459982199474
Author(s):  
Maggie Xing ◽  
Dorina Kallogjeri ◽  
Jay F. Piccirillo
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Cognitive Training ◽  
Mixed Model ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Functional Index ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
The Impact

Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of cognitive training in improving tinnitus bother and to identify predictors of patient response. Study Design Prospective open-label randomized controlled trial. Setting Online. Methods Participants were adults with subjective idiopathic nonpulsatile tinnitus causing significant tinnitus-related distress. The intervention group trained by using auditory-intensive exercises for 20 minutes per day, 5 days per week, for 8 weeks. The active control group trained on the same schedule with non–auditory intensive games. Surveys were completed at baseline, 8 weeks, and 12 weeks. Results A total of 64 participants completed the study. The median age was 63 years (range, 25-69) in the intervention group and 61 years (34-68) in the control group. Mixed model analysis revealed that within-subject change in Tinnitus Functional Index in the intervention group was not different than the control group, with marginal mean differences (95% CI): 0.24 (–11.20 to 10.7) and 2.17 (–8.50 to 12.83) at 8 weeks and 2.33 (–8.6 to 13.3) and 3.36 (–7.91 to 14.6) at 12 weeks, respectively. When the 2 study groups were compared, the control group had higher Tinnitus Functional Index scores than the intervention group by 10.5 points at baseline (95% CI, –0.92 to 29.89), 8.1 at 8 weeks (95% CI, –3.27 to 19.42), and 9.4 at 12 weeks (95% CI, –2.45 to 21.34). Conclusion Auditory-intensive cognitive training was not associated with changes in self-reported tinnitus bother. Given the potential for neuroplasticity to affect tinnitus, we believe that future studies on cognitive training for tinnitus remain relevant.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document