Experimental study of mass transfer and H2S removal efficiency in a spray tower

2008 ◽  
Vol 47 (5) ◽  
pp. 886-892 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Turpin ◽  
A. Couvert ◽  
A. Laplanche ◽  
A. Paillier
2013 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 23 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. C. Codolo ◽  
W. A. Bizzo

This work presents an experimental evaluation of the removal efficiency of SO2 in a spray tower. The experiments were carried out in different conditions, varying gas velocity and using different sprays nozzles. The influence of the height of tower on the removal efficiency was evaluated through experiments inside spray tower. In this study was used two sets of five nozzles, with diameter of orifice of 2.4 and 3.2 mm, and only one nozzle with diameter of orifice of 5.6 mm. The results showed the influence of the gas velocity and L/G ratio in the removal efficiency, the influence of the gas velocity on the volumetric gas side mass transfer coefficient and the influence of the height of the tower in the removal efficiency.


2007 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 277-286 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin J. Garland ◽  
S. U. Rahman ◽  
K. A. Mahgoub ◽  
Ahmad Nafees

Author(s):  
S. Bouzenada ◽  
T. Salmon ◽  
L. Fraikin ◽  
A. Kaabi ◽  
A. Léonard

2001 ◽  
Vol 1 (4) ◽  
pp. 177-184
Author(s):  
B.I. Dvorak ◽  
J.W. Schauble

Environmental engineers are frequently faced with uncertainty in making design decisions because the true value of many process parameters is unknown. In this study, the design of countercurrent air stripping towers was modeled using fuzzy numbers, taking into account uncertainties in mass transfer and Henry's constant. It was found that, in addition to cost, the risk of failure is an important design consideration for stripping tower design. A significant over-design is both cost-effective and results in less risk of design failure. The air-to-water ratio that yielded the least risk of failure switched from low to high as the removal efficiency of the tower increased. An important result is that at lower removal efficiencies, tower design and operation is most sensitive to uncertainties in mass transfer and at higher removal efficiencies, tower design and operation is most sensitive to uncertainties in Henry's constant . The implication is that low air-to-water ratios are best when the regulatory target removal efficiency is low and/or when the uncertainty in the value of the contaminant's Henry's constant is larger than the uncertainty in the mass transfer coefficient value. Otherwise a high air-to-water ratio results in the least risk of process failure.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document