scholarly journals Mass transfer, gas hold-up and cell cultivation studies in a bottom agitated draft tube reactor and multiple impeller Rushton turbine configuration

2016 ◽  
Vol 155 ◽  
pp. 83-98 ◽  
Author(s):  
Petri Tervasmäki ◽  
Marko Latva-Kokko ◽  
Sanna Taskila ◽  
Juha Tanskanen
1995 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 279-285 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoshiyuki Bando ◽  
Makoto Nishimura ◽  
Hiroshi Hayakawa ◽  
Nobuyuki Kawase ◽  
Atsushi Idota

1996 ◽  
Vol 51 (7) ◽  
pp. 1173-1176 ◽  
Author(s):  
D.G. Karamanev ◽  
C. Chavarie ◽  
R. Samson

2009 ◽  
Vol 190 (3) ◽  
pp. 319-323 ◽  
Author(s):  
Donata Konopacka-Łyskawa ◽  
Zbigniew Cisiak ◽  
Bożenna Kawalec-Pietrenko

AIChE Journal ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 53 (11) ◽  
pp. 2897-2904 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Albijanić ◽  
V. Havran ◽  
D. Lj. Petrović ◽  
M. Đurić ◽  
M. N. Tekić

2010 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 379-386 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aoyi Ochieng ◽  
Maurice Onyango

Hydrodynamics and mixing efficiency in stirred tanks influence power draw and are therefore important for the design of many industrial processes. In the present study, both experimental and simulation methods were employed to determine the flow fields in different mixing tank configurations in single phase system. The laser Doppler velocimetry (LDV) and computational fluid dynamics (CFD) techniques were used to determine the flow fields in systems with and without a draft tube. There was a reasonable agreement between the simulation and experimental results. It was shown that the use of a draft tube with the Rushton turbine and hydrofoil impeller resulted in a reduction in the homogenization energy by 19.2% and 17.7%, respectively. This indicates that a reduction in the operating cost can be achieved with the use of a draft tube in a stirred tank and there would be a greater cost reduction in a system stirred by the Rushton turbine compared to that stirred by a propeller.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document