Mirizzi Syndrome: Recognition on Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography

2012 ◽  
Vol 10 (12) ◽  
pp. A32 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mudit Gupta ◽  
Deepak Garg
2012 ◽  
Vol 78 (1) ◽  
pp. 61-65 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hua Zhong ◽  
Jian-Ping Gong

The objective of this study is to summarize the experience in diagnosis and treatment of Mirizzi syndrome (MS) and reduce the incidence of operative complications. Twenty-five cases of Mirizzi syndrome from January 2005 to January 2010 were retrospectively analyzed. There were 11 male patients and 14 female patients, ranging in ages from 26 to 80 years with a median age of 51.3. Preoperative radiological diagnosis was achieved in 10 patients: ultrasonography (n = 5) and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (n = 10). The others were diagnosed intra-operatively. Fifteen patients had Type I MS. Two were treated with laparoscopic cholecystectomy successfully. The laparoscopic procedure had to be converted to open procedure in one patient. Seven patients had open complete cholecystectomy, three had subtotal cholecystectomy, and two had removal of stones from the gall bladder and choledochostomy after cholecystotomy was performed, with secondary cholecystectomy 3 months later. Six patients had Type II MS. Five underwent cholecystectomy, common bile duct (CBD) repair, and T-tube insertion. One was managed with transection of CBD and Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy. Two patients with Type III MS underwent cholecystectomy, CBD repair, and T-tube insertion. Cholecystectomy and Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy was performed in the two patients with Type IV MS. All the patients recovered from the operation. The follow-up period ranged from 5 years to 5 months. One patient developed obstructive jaundice more than 2 years after the operation, and recovered after the secondary operation. The follow-up of others were uneventful. Preoperative diagnosis of MS is very difficult. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography is very helpful in preoperative diagnosis, and a high index of clinical suspicion is required to make a preoperative or intra-operative diagnosis, which can lead to correct operative strategy to manage Mirizzi syndrome.


2002 ◽  
Vol 16 (10) ◽  
pp. 1494d-1495 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Presta ◽  
A. Ragozzino ◽  
P. Perrotti ◽  
C. Antropoli ◽  
D. Molino ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 28-30
Author(s):  
Tanita Suttichaimongkol

Cholangiocarcinoma is a primary biliary tract tumor arising from the bile duct epithelium. Classically, these tumors have been categorized according to their anatomic location as intrahepatic and extrahepatic. Hilar cholangiocarcinoma is the most common type of extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. It is the most difficult cancer to diagnose and therefore carries a poor prognosis with a 5-year survivalrate of less than 10%. Diagnostic imaging, coupled with a high degree of clinical suspicion, play a critical role in timely diagnosis, staging, and evaluation for surgical resectability. The most common imagingmodalities used for diagnosis and staging of hilar cholangiocarcinoma include ultrasound (US), computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging/magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography(MRI/MRCP). This article showed a case presentation and reviewed the imaging appearance of hilar cholangiocarcinoma.   Figure 1  Greyscale sonography at the level of hepatic hilum revealed an ill-defined hilar mass (asterisk)resulting in upstream dilatation of right (arrow) and left (arrow head) main intrahepatic duct.  


2018 ◽  
Vol 09 (01) ◽  
pp. 026-031 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manoj Munirathinam ◽  
Pugazhendhi Thangavelu ◽  
Ratnakar Kini

ABSTRACTPancreatico‑pleural fistula is a rare but serious complication of acute and chronic pancreatitis. The pleural effusion caused by pancreatico‑pleural fistula is usually massive and recurrent. It is predominately left‑sided but right‑sided and bilateral effusion does occur. We report four cases of pancreatico‑pleural fistula admitted to our hospital. Their clinical presentation and management aspects are discussed. Two patients were managed by pancreatic endotherapy and two patients were managed conservatively. All four patients improved symptomatically and were discharged and are on regular follow‑up. Most of these patients would be evaluated for their breathlessness and pleural effusion delaying the diagnosis of pancreatic pathology and management. Hence, earlier recognition and prompt treatment would help the patients to recover from their illnesses. Pancreatic pleural fistula diagnosis requires a high index of suspicion in patients presenting with chest symptoms or pleural effusion. Extremely high pleural fluid amylase levels are usual but not universally present. A chest X‑ray, pleural fluid analysis, and abdominal imaging (magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography/magnetic resonance imaging abdomen more useful than contrast‑enhanced computed tomography abdomen) would clinch the diagnosis. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography with stent or sphincterotomy should be considered when pancreatic duct (PD) reveals a stricture or when medical management fails in patients with dilated or irregular PD. Surgical intervention may be indicated in patients with complete disruption of PD or multiple strictures.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document