Prevalence and Implications of Frailty in Older Adults with Incident Inflammatory Bowel Diseases: a Nationwide Cohort Study

Author(s):  
Bharati Kochar ◽  
Juulia Jylhävä ◽  
Jonas Söderling ◽  
Christine S. Ritchie ◽  
Jonas F. Ludvigsson ◽  
...  
PLoS ONE ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (6) ◽  
pp. e0235142
Author(s):  
Martina Taborelli ◽  
Michele Sozzi ◽  
Stefania Del Zotto ◽  
Federica Toffolutti ◽  
Marcella Montico ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 ◽  
pp. 175628482110254
Author(s):  
Bharati Kochar ◽  
Ariela R. Orkaby ◽  
Ashwin N. Ananthakrishnan ◽  
Christine S. Ritchie

Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD), consisting of Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis, are chronic remitting, relapsing inflammatory conditions of the gastrointestinal tract. While traditionally a disease of younger ages, the number of older adults with IBD is rising rapidly. Patients with IBD often experience geriatric syndromes at earlier ages. Older adults with IBD have poorer disease and treatment-related outcomes compared with younger adults with IBD. Applying the principles of geriatrics to understanding a chronic disease in older adults may improve health span. Better tools are needed to stratify IBD patients who are at high risk for adverse events. Frailty is a geriatric construct that may approximate biologic age. Frailty is a complex, multi-dimensional syndrome that leads to increased vulnerability to stress and decline of reserve across multiple physiologic systems. In this review, we present the leading conceptual models of frailty and discuss the applications of frailty in immune-mediated diseases. We also review chronic conditions where frailty has been applied successfully as a tool for risk stratification. Finally, we discuss in the detail the growing body of literature highlighting the relationship between frailty and IBD, the epidemiology of frailty in IBD, and ramifications of frailty in IBD.


2021 ◽  
Vol 27 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S4-S5
Author(s):  
Bharati Kochar ◽  
Virginia Pate ◽  
Michael Kappelman ◽  
Millie Long ◽  
Ashwin Ananthakrishnan ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The number of older adults with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) is increasing. Older adults with IBD are less likely to receive effective immunosuppression. We aimed to determine efficacy and safety of biologic therapies in older adults with IBD. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study using an active comparator, new user design in a 20% random sample from the 50 state Medicare claims database between May 2014 and December 2018. We included patients who initiated vedolizumab or an anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α agent (infliximab, adalimumab, golimumab or certolizumab) following 12-months of continuous enrollment in Medicare fee-for-service Parts A/B/D without either study drug. Patients were required to be ≥65 years old and have ≥2 international classification of disease (ICD) codes of Crohn’s disease (CD) or ulcerative colitis (UC). We excluded patients who received other biologic therapies and/or those who had ≥2 codes for other immunologic conditions. Pertinent co-variates included were age, sex, race Charlson Co-morbidity Index (CCI), predicted probability of frailty, healthcare utilization and baseline IBD medications. The outcomes of interest were hospitalizations, IBD-related surgery and new corticosteroid use ≥ 60 days after drug initiation. We described the study population, assessed health care utilization and use of other IBD medications. We estimated crude incidence rates and hazard ratios (HR) adjusted for the covariates using standardized mortality ratio (SMR) weights. Results We identified 488 vedolizumab users and 2,213 anti-TNF users. The median age was 72 years in the vedolizumab cohort and 71 years in the anti-TNF cohort; 12% of both cohorts were aged ≥80 years. Differences in the two cohorts existed with regards to sex, race, baseline healthcare utilization and IBD-related medications, but all the baseline differences were balanced by weighting measured by a standardized mean difference (SMD) <0.1 (Table 1). After weighting, vedolizumab users were less likely to be hospitalized in the 12 months after biologic initiation (HR: 0.81, 95% CI: 0.68 – 0.96). While there was no significant difference in IBD related hospitalizations, older adults with IBD were less likely to have an infection-related hospitalization (HR: 0.39, 95% CI: 0.23 – 0.65). There were no significant differences in IBD related surgery and steroid use after induction (Table 2). Conclusions In this large, retrospective cohort study of older IBD patients who were new users of vedolizumab and anti-TNF agents, we found that older patients initiated on vedolizumab were significantly less likely to have an infection-related hospitalization. However, there were no significant differences in IBD-related hospitalizations, IBD-related surgery or corticosteroid use after biologic induction.


2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S625-S625
Author(s):  
D WARD ◽  
S Gørtz ◽  
N Nyboe Andersen ◽  
J Kirchgesner ◽  
T Jess

Abstract Background Tumour necrosis factor (TNF) has a central role in the pathophysiology of immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs) including rheumatoid arthritis, psoriasis, hidradenitis suppurativa, and inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD). However, there have been case reports of patients receiving an anti-TNF therapy for one IMID subsequently developing a second IMID. We conducted a nationwide cohort study investigating the risk of incident IMID following anti-TNF exposure in patients with IBD in Denmark. Methods We followed patients with IBD from 1 January 2005 or date of IBD diagnosis (whichever occurred last) to an outcome event including incident diagnosis of hidradenitis suppurativa, arthropathic psoriasis, other forms of psoriasis, or rheumatoid arthritis; or emigration, death or 31 December 2018 (whichever occurred first). Patients were defined as exposed after a 3-month lag period from first anti-TNF infusion throughout follow-up, analogous to an intention-to-treat design. The lag period was censored from analyses to avoid including incipient IMIDs, unlikely to be caused by newly initiated anti-TNF treatment. We excluded patients initiating anti-TNF or with an outcome diagnosis before either 1 January 2005 or IBD diagnosis. We used Cox regression models with age as the underlying timescale, and sex, type of IBD (Crohn’s disease or ulcerative colitis), and calendar period of IBD diagnosis (in 5 year groups) as strata to estimate hazard ratios for each outcome, comparing anti-TNF users and non-users. Results Incidence rates (and 95% confidence intervals [CI]) as events per 100 000 person-years among anti-TNF users and non-users were, respectively, 138 (109–173) and 25.6 (22.0–29.7) for hidradenitis suppurativa, 26.3 (15.6–44.4) and 7.81 (5.95–10.2) for arthropathic psoriasis, 1177 (1085–1277) and 204 (121–189) for other forms of psoriasis, and 152 (121–189) and 95.6 (88.5–103) for rheumatoid arthritis. Hazard ratios (and 95% C.I.) were increased for hidradenitis suppurativa 2.91 (2.15–3.94), arthropathic psoriasis 2.62 (1.40–4.93), other forms of psoriasis 4.76 (4.27–5.31), and rheumatoid arthritis 2.35 (1.83–3.01). Conclusion The results indicate that patients with IBD receiving anti-TNF have an increased risk of IMIDs. An almost 5-fold increase in the risk of psoriasis is consistent with previous reports of psoriasiform skin lesions related to anti-TNF use. However, as more severe IBD is likely to be associated with both initiating anti-TNF and the incidence of other inflammatory diseases, the results are subject to confounding by indication. Thus, these results should be considered preliminary, and we plan to further address confounding by using propensity score methods.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document