First screening of biocides, persistent organic pollutants, pharmaceutical and personal care products in Antarctic phytoplankton from Deception Island by FT-ICR-MS

Chemosphere ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 274 ◽  
pp. 129860
Author(s):  
Bernardo Duarte ◽  
Carla Gameiro ◽  
Ana Rita Matos ◽  
Andreia Figueiredo ◽  
Marta Sousa Silva ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 161 ◽  
pp. 111818
Author(s):  
Basílio M.T. Sotão Neto ◽  
Tatiane Combi ◽  
Satie Taniguchi ◽  
Ana C.R. Albergaria-Barbosa ◽  
Raissa B. Ramos ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Xiaojuan Bai ◽  
Cong Wang ◽  
Xuyu Wang ◽  
Tianqi Jia ◽  
Boxuan Sun ◽  
...  

Pharmaceutical and personal care products (PPCPs) are the most common hazardous environmental pollutants. PDIs anion radical is the promising photocatalyst to transform PPCPs into non-toxic CO2 and H2O for clean...


Elem Sci Anth ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erinn K. Richmond ◽  
Michael R. Grace ◽  
John J. Kelly ◽  
Alexander J. Reisinger ◽  
Emma J. Rosi ◽  
...  

Pharmaceuticals and personal care products (PPCPs) are ubiquitous in freshwater ecosystems worldwide and are recognized as contaminants of concern. Currently, contaminants of concern are classified for their persistence, bioaccumulation, and toxicity (PBT criteria). PPCPs are not classified as persistent organic pollutants (POPs), although some PPCPs share characteristics similar to POPs. For example, PPCPs are known to be pseudopersistent due to constant discharge into the environment, often at low concentrations. At commonly reported environmental concentrations, PPCPs are rarely toxic, but the ability of these compounds to disrupt ecological processes and functions in freshwater ecosystems is often overlooked. Herein we briefly summarize recent studies highlighting the potential ecological effects of PPCPs, including effects on key ecological processes (e.g. primary productivity and community respiration), and we propose that appropriate screening for harmful effects of PPCPs in surface waters should be expanded to include Ecologically Disrupting Compounds (EcoDC) in addition to the established PBT criteria.


2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tee L. Guidotti

On 16 October 1996, a malfunction at the Swan Hills Special Waste Treatment Center (SHSWTC) in Alberta, Canada, released an undetermined quantity of persistent organic pollutants (POPs) into the atmosphere, including polychlorinated biphenyls, dioxins, and furans. The circumstances of exposure are detailed in Part 1, Background and Policy Issues. An ecologically based, staged health risk assessment was conducted in two parts with two levels of government as sponsors. The first, called the Swan Hills Study, is described in Part 2. A subsequent evaluation, described here in Part 3, was undertaken by Health Canada and focused exclusively on Aboriginal residents in three communities living near the lake, downwind, and downstream of the SHSWTC of the area. It was designed to isolate effects on members living a more traditional Aboriginal lifestyle. Aboriginal communities place great cultural emphasis on access to traditional lands and derive both cultural and health benefits from “country foods” such as venison (deer meat) and local fish. The suspicion of contamination of traditional lands and the food supply made risk management exceptionally difficult in this situation. The conclusion of both the Swan Hills and Lesser Slave Lake studies was that although POPs had entered the ecosystem, no effect could be demonstrated on human exposure or health outcome attributable to the incident. However, the value of this case study is in the detail of the process, not the ultimate dimensions of risk. The findings of the Lesser Slave Lake Study have not been published previously and are incomplete.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document