Management of neoplastic spinal tumors in a spine surgery care unit

2015 ◽  
Vol 128 ◽  
pp. 35-40 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zairi Fahed ◽  
Vieillard Marie-Helene ◽  
Devos Patrick ◽  
Rabih Aboukais ◽  
Gras Louis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Neurospine ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 733-740
Author(s):  
Jae-Koo Lee ◽  
Jong Hwa Park ◽  
Seung-Jae Hyun ◽  
Daniel Hodel ◽  
Oliver N. Hausmann

This paper is an overview of various features of regional anesthesia (RA) and aims to introduce spine surgeons unfamiliar with RA. RA is commonly used for procedures that involve the lower extremities, perineum, pelvic girdle, or lower abdomen. However, general anesthesia (GA) is preferred and most commonly used for lumbar spine surgery. Spinal anesthesia (SA) and epidural anesthesia (EA) are the most commonly used RA methods, and a combined method of SA and EA (CSE). Compared to GA, RA offers numerous benefits including reduced intraoperative blood loss, arterial and venous thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, perioperative cardiac ischemic incidents, renal failure, hypoxic episodes in the postanesthetic care unit, postoperative morbidity and mortality, and decreased incidence of cognitive dysfunction. In spine surgery, RA is associated with lower pain scores, postoperative nausea and vomiting, positioning injuries, shorter anesthesia time, and higher patient satisfaction. Currently, RA is mostly used in short lumbar spine surgeries. However, recent findings illustrate the possibility of applying RA in spinal tumors and spinal fusion. Various researches reveal that SA is an effective alternative to GA with lower minor complications incidence. Comprehensive insight on RA will promote spine surgery under RA, thereby broadening the horizon of spine surgery under RA.


2015 ◽  
Vol 136 ◽  
pp. 147
Author(s):  
Fahed Zairi ◽  
Marie-Helene Vieillard ◽  
Patrick Devos ◽  
Rabih Aboukais ◽  
Louis Gras ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S23-S38
Author(s):  
Elie Massaad ◽  
Ganesh M Shankar ◽  
John H Shin

Abstract Computer-assisted navigation has made a major impact on spine surgery, providing surgeons with technological tools to safely place instrumentation anywhere in the spinal column. With advances in intraoperative image acquisition, registration, and processing, many surgeons are now using navigation in their practices. The incorporation of navigation into the workflow of surgeons continues to expand with the evolution of minimally invasive techniques and robotic surgery. While numerous investigators have demonstrated the benefit of navigation for improving the accuracy of instrumentation, few have reported applying this technology to other aspects of spine surgery. Surgeries to correct spinal deformities and resect spinal tumors are technically demanding, incorporating a wide range of techniques not only for instrumentation placement but also for osteotomy planning and executing the goals of surgery. Although these subspecialties vary in their objectives, they share similar challenges with potentially high complications, invasiveness, and consequences of failed execution. Herein, we highlight the utility of using spinal navigation for applications beyond screw placement: specifically, for planning and executing osteotomies and guiding the extent of tumor resection. A narrative review of the work that has been done is supplemented with illustrative cases demonstrating these applications.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document