scholarly journals System reliability analyses of static and dynamic structures via direct probability integral method

2022 ◽  
Vol 388 ◽  
pp. 114262
Author(s):  
Guohai Chen ◽  
Dixiong Yang ◽  
Yunhe Liu ◽  
Hongchao Guo
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (18) ◽  
pp. 6623
Author(s):  
Xianfeng Tan ◽  
Bingzhong Song ◽  
Huaizhi Bo ◽  
Yunwei Li ◽  
Meng Wang ◽  
...  

Underground coal mining-induced ground subsidence (or major ground vertical settlement) is a major concern to the mining industry, government and people affected. Based on the probability integral method, this paper presents a new ground subsidence prediction method for predicting irregularly shaped coal mining area extraction-induced ground subsidence. Firstly, the Delaunay triangulation method is used to divide the irregularly shaped mining area into a series of triangular extraction elements. Then, the extraction elements within the calculation area are selected. Finally, the Monte Carlo method is used to calculate extraction element-induced ground subsidence. The proposed method was tested by two experimental data sets: the simulation data set and direct leveling-based subsidence observations. The simulation results show that the prediction error of the proposed method is proportional to mesh size and inversely proportional to the amount of generated random points within the auxiliary domain. In addition, when the mesh size is smaller than 0.5 times the minimum deviation of the inflection point of the mining area, and the amount of random points within an auxiliary domain is greater than 800 times the area of the extraction element, the difference between the proposed method-based subsidence predictions and the traditional probability integral method-based subsidence predictions is marginal. The measurement results show that the root-mean-square error of the proposed method-based subsidence predictions is smaller than 3 cm, the average of absolute deviations of the proposed method-based subsidence predictions is 2.49 cm, and the maximum absolute deviation is 4.05 cm, which is equal to 0.75% of the maximum direct leveling-based subsidence observation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document