A simple FE approach to study microstructural influences in power-law creep

2012 ◽  
Vol 52 (1) ◽  
pp. 73-76 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cornelia Pein ◽  
Christof Sommitsch
Keyword(s):  
1992 ◽  
Vol 33 (12) ◽  
pp. 1182-1184 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yukio Ishikawa ◽  
Kouichi Maruyama ◽  
Hiroshi Oikawa

2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryoichiro Agata ◽  
Sylvain D. Barbot ◽  
Kohei Fujita ◽  
Mamoru Hyodo ◽  
Takeshi Iinuma ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
michael kassner

This paper discusses recent developments in creep, over a wide range of temperature, that mqy change our understanding of creep. The five-power law creep exponent (3.5 to 7) has never been explained in fundamental terms. The best the scientific community has done is to develop a natural three power-law creep equation that falls short of rationalizing the higher stress exponents that are typically five. This inability has persisted for many decades. Computational work examining the stress-dependence of the climb rate of edge dislocations we may rationalize the phenomenological creep equations. Harper-Dorn creep, “discovered” over 60 years ago has been immersed in controversy. Some investigators have insisted that a stress exponent of one is reasonable. Others believe that the observation of a stress exponent of one is a consequence of dislocation network frustration. Others believe the stress exponent is artificial due to the inclusion of restoration mechanisms such as dynamic recrystallization or grain growth that is not of any consequence in the five power-law regime. Also, the experiments in the Harper-Dorn regime, which accumulate strain very slowly (sometimes over a year) may not have attained a true steady state. New theories suggest that absence or presence of Harper-Dorn may be a consequence of the initial dislocation density. Novel experimental work suggests that power-law breakdown may be a consequence of a supersaturation of vacancies which increase self-diffusion.


JOM ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 69 (11) ◽  
pp. 2229-2236 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Sudharshan Phani ◽  
W. C. Oliver ◽  
G. M. Pharr

2016 ◽  
Vol 10 (5) ◽  
pp. 1915-1932 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maarten Krabbendam

Abstract. Basal ice motion is crucial to ice dynamics of ice sheets. The classic Weertman model for basal sliding over bedrock obstacles proposes that sliding velocity is controlled by pressure melting and/or ductile flow, whichever is the fastest; it further assumes that pressure melting is limited by heat flow through the obstacle and ductile flow is controlled by standard power-law creep. These last two assumptions, however, are not applicable if a substantial basal layer of temperate (T ∼ Tmelt) ice is present. In that case, frictional melting can produce excess basal meltwater and efficient water flow, leading to near-thermal equilibrium. High-temperature ice creep experiments have shown a sharp weakening of a factor 5–10 close to Tmelt, suggesting standard power-law creep does not operate due to a switch to melt-assisted creep with a possible component of grain boundary melting. Pressure melting is controlled by meltwater production, heat advection by flowing meltwater to the next obstacle and heat conduction through ice/rock over half the obstacle height. No heat flow through the obstacle is required. Ice streaming over a rough, hard bed, as possibly in the Northeast Greenland Ice Stream, may be explained by enhanced basal motion in a thick temperate ice layer.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document