Musculoskeletal tumour mimics: a pictorial review

2019 ◽  
Vol 74 ◽  
pp. e15
Author(s):  
Matthew Mariathas ◽  
Neeraj Purohit ◽  
Madeleine Sampson
2008 ◽  
Vol 58 (2) ◽  
pp. 199 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seon Hyeong Choi ◽  
Eun-Kyung Kim ◽  
Jin Young Kwak ◽  
Min Jung Kim ◽  
Ki Kun Oh

2021 ◽  
Vol 139 ◽  
pp. 109722
Author(s):  
Raekha Kumar ◽  
Scott Rice ◽  
Ravi Kumar Lingam

Author(s):  
Marco Becciolini ◽  
Christopher Pivec ◽  
Andrea Raspanti ◽  
Georg Riegler

2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Alessandra D’Amico ◽  
Teresa Perillo ◽  
Lorenzo Ugga ◽  
Renato Cuocolo ◽  
Arturo Brunetti

AbstractIntra-cranial and spinal foreign body reactions represent potential complications of medical procedures. Their diagnosis may be challenging as they frequently show an insidious clinical presentation and can mimic other life-threatening conditions. Their pathophysiological mechanism is represented by a local inflammatory response due to retained or migrated surgical elements. Cranial interventions may be responsible for the presence of retained foreign objects represented by surgical materials (such as sponges, bone wax, and Teflon). Spinal diagnostic and therapeutic procedures, including myelography, chordotomy, vertebroplasty, and device implantation, are another potential source of foreign bodies. These reactions can also follow material migration or embolization, for example in the case of Lipiodol, Teflon, and cement vertebroplasty. Imaging exams, especially CT and MRI, have a central role in the differential diagnosis of these conditions together with patient history. Neuroradiological findings are dependent on the type of material that has been left in or migrated from the surgical area. Knowledge of these entities is relevant for clinical practice as the correct identification of foreign bodies and related inflammatory reactions, material embolisms, or migrations can be difficult. This pictorial review reports neuroradiological semeiotics and differential diagnosis of foreign body-related imaging abnormalities in the brain and spine.


2021 ◽  
pp. 221049172198908
Author(s):  
Lam Wei Sze Yvette ◽  
Fong Sin Tak ◽  
Mak Ka Lok

Introduction: Fibromatosis is a benign disease yet prone to recurrence. The best treatment option remains controversial. The purpose of this study was to analyse the management approach in our musculoskeletal tumour centre. Materials and Methods: Thirty-four patients with extra-abdominal fibromatosis referred to our centre between 2000 to 2018 were included. Patients’ demographics, tumour location and size, year of diagnosis, treatment modalities, surgical margins, recurrence, and subsequent management were analysed. Results: Patients mostly presented in the second and third decade, with female predominance. Twenty-seven patients underwent excision. Other management options included ‘watchful waiting’, pharmacological treatment and radiotherapy. Recurrence rate was 51.9%. There was no statistically significant relationship between marginal status and recurrence. Conclusion: We report our experiences on management of fibromatosis, with strategy shifted from early excision to a conservative approach over the years. Surgical excision is still indicated in some situations. Tumour recurrence is not rare but second excision is not always necessary.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document