A numerical model of thermal analysis for woven wire screen matrix heat exchanger

Cryogenics ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 49 (9) ◽  
pp. 482-489 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chen Shuangtao ◽  
Hou Yu ◽  
Zhao Hongli ◽  
Xi Lan
Keyword(s):  
Thermal Analysis ◽  
Heat Exchanger ◽  
Numerical Model ◽  
Wire Screen ◽  
Matrix Heat Exchanger ◽  
Matrix Heat

scholarly journals Performance Analysis of Woven Wire Screen Matrix Heat Exchanger Units

2011 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 192-202 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hongli ZHAO ◽  
Yu HOU ◽  
Xuemei SU ◽  
Qiaoyu ZHANG
Keyword(s):  
Heat Exchanger ◽  
Performance Analysis ◽  
Wire Screen ◽  
Matrix Heat Exchanger ◽  
Matrix Heat

Experimental Study on Cryogenic Counterflow Woven-Wire Screen Matrix Heat Exchanger

2012 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 322-327 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shuangtao Chen ◽  
Hongli Zhao ◽  
Yu Hou ◽  
Qiaoyu Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Experimental Study ◽  
Heat Exchanger ◽  
Wire Screen ◽  
Matrix Heat Exchanger ◽  
Matrix Heat

Comparison of stationary and rotary matrix heat exchangers using teaching-learning-based optimization algorithm

2017 ◽  
Vol 232 (4) ◽  
pp. 493-502 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hassan Hajabdollahi
Keyword(s):  
Heat Exchanger ◽  
Pressure Drop ◽  
Optimization Algorithm ◽  
Heat Exchangers ◽  
Design Parameters ◽  
Matrix Heat Exchanger ◽  
Teaching Learning Based Optimization ◽  
Mass Flow Rates ◽  
Teaching Learning ◽  
Matrix Heat

In this paper, two kinds of compact heat exchanger including plate fin heat exchanger and rotary regenerator, respectively the stationary and rotary matrix heat exchanger, are compared. For this purpose, both heat exchangers are optimized by considering three simultaneous objective functions including effectiveness, heat exchanger volume, and total pressure drop using multi-objective teaching learning based optimization algorithm. Six different design parameters are considered for the both plate fin heat exchanger and rotary regenerator. Optimization is performed for the same and different hot and cold side mass flow rates. The optimum results reveal 13.26% growth in the effectiveness, 475.17% increase in the volume, and 95.45% reduction in the pressure drop in RR as compared with plate fin heat exchanger and for the final optimum point. As a result, rotary regenerator is more suitable in the case of high effectiveness and low pressure drop while plate fin heat exchanger is more suitable in the case of space limitation (lower heat exchanger volume).

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document