Focused Ultrasound Examination of Canine and Feline Emergency Urinary Tract Disorders

Author(s):  
Laura Cole ◽  
Karen Humm ◽  
Helen Dirrig
Author(s):  
Rasheda Amin ◽  
Sun-Young Ahn ◽  
Asha Moudgil

2009 ◽  
Vol 55 (1) ◽  
pp. 100-120 ◽  
Author(s):  
Apostolos Apostolidis ◽  
Prokar Dasgupta ◽  
Pierre Denys ◽  
Sohier Elneil ◽  
Clare J. Fowler ◽  
...  

Animals ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 452 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giuliano Borriello ◽  
Jacopo Guccione ◽  
Antonio Di Loria ◽  
Antonio Bosco ◽  
Paola Pepe ◽  
...  

A complete ultrasound examination (cUS) of the liver was performed on 172 female sheep and compared to the performance of a fast-focused ultrasound technique to diagnose echinococcal cysts. The scanned area was divided in: HYP (right hypocondrium), zone (Z)1 from HYP to the 11th intercostal space (IS), Z2 (10th–8th IS) and Z3 (7th–5th IS). Contiguous scans were also examined (HYP + Z1, Z1 + Z2, Z2 + Z3). Furthermore, during the procedures, the sheep were divided into three groups according to the body weight: Group (G) 1 (lighter), G2 (medium), and G3 (heavier). Finally, diagnostic outcomes were compared with necropsy findings. cUS obtained the highest values of sensitivity (Se) (91%), Specificity (Sp) (80%), and positive-zones (124/138, 90%), as compared to the other scans. cUS was also characterized by high values of Se and Sp and was able to identify a great number of positive-zones, when sheep were divided by body-weight groups. Similar performances were obtained in G1 by HYP (Se: 91%–Sp: 82%; 18/20, 90% of positive-zones) and HYP + Z1 scans (Se: 91%–Sp: 82; 90% of positive-zones, 18/20). Thus, in lighter breeds, the examination of HYP and HYP + Z1 scan windows could be considered reliable techniques for identifying the infected animals, while in heavier sheep the cUS still represents the best option.


2005 ◽  
Vol 40 (3) ◽  
pp. E43-E45 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shinkichi Kamata ◽  
Noriaki Usui ◽  
Masafumi Kamiyama ◽  
Akihiro Yoneda ◽  
Yuko Tazuke ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 71-84 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pradeep Tyagi ◽  
Mahendra Kashyap ◽  
Harvey Hensley ◽  
Naoki Yoshimura

1996 ◽  
Vol 89 (3) ◽  
pp. 155P-158P ◽  
Author(s):  
P S J Malone

When used as a screening procedure, ultrasound examination of the fetal urinary tract seldom leads to beneficial interventions. There is also a cost in terms of parental anxiety and unnecessary investigation and treatment. A formal screening programme would therefore be unjustified. However, screening of women for obstetric purposes will continue to reveal fetal abnormalities, and a strategy for dealing with these is needed. Antenatal treatments remain experimental; for most of the common conditions postnatal treatment has no urgency; and, in cases of minor abnormality detected by ultrasound, the best course may be to do nothing.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document