scholarly journals Community norms for the Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire (EDE-Q) among transgender men and women

2020 ◽  
Vol 37 ◽  
pp. 101381 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jason M. Nagata ◽  
Stuart B. Murray ◽  
Emilio J. Compte ◽  
Erica H. Pak ◽  
Rebecca Schauer ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jason M. Nagata ◽  
Emilio J. Compte ◽  
Chloe J. Cattle ◽  
Annesa Flentje ◽  
Matthew R. Capriotti ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose Gender-expansive individuals (i.e., those who identify outside of the binary system of man or woman) are a marginalized group that faces discrimination and have a high burden of mental health problems, but there is a paucity of research on eating disorders in this population. This study aimed to describe the community norms for the Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire (EDE-Q) in gender-expansive populations. Methods The participants were 988 gender-expansive individuals (defined as neither exclusively cisgender nor binary transgender) from The PRIDE study, an existing longitudinal cohort study of health outcomes in sexual and gender minority people. Results We present the mean scores, standard deviations, and percentile ranks for the Global score and four subscale scores of the EDE-Q in this group as a whole and stratified by sex assigned at birth. Gender-expansive individuals reported any occurrence (≥1/28 days) of dietary restraint (23.0%), objective binge episodes (12.9%), excessive exercise (7.4%), self-induced vomiting (1.4%), or laxative misuse (1.2%). We found no statistically significant differences by sex assigned at birth. Compared to a prior study of transgender men and women, there were no significant differences in eating attitudes or disordered eating behaviors noted between gender-expansive individuals and transgender men. Transgender women reported higher Restraint and Shape Concern subscale scores compared to gender-expansive individuals. Compared to a prior study of presumed cisgender men 18–26 years, our age-matched gender-expansive sample had higher Eating, Weight, and Shape Concern subscales and Global Score, but reported a lower frequency of objective binge episodes and excessive exercise. Compared to a prior study of presumed cisgender women 18–25 years, our age-matched gender-expansive sample had a higher Shape Concern subscale score, a lower Restraint subscale score, and lower frequencies of self-induced vomiting, laxative misuse, and excessive exercise. Conclusions Gender-expansive individuals reported lower Restraint and Shape Concern scores than transgender women; higher Eating, Weight, and Shape Concern scores than presumed cisgender men; and lower Restraint but higher Shape Concern scores than presumed cisgender women. These norms can help clinicians in treating this population and interpreting the EDE-Q scores of their gender-expansive patients.


2019 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 92-101 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jason M. Nagata ◽  
Matthew R. Capriotti ◽  
Stuart B. Murray ◽  
Emilio J. Compte ◽  
Scott Griffiths ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 378-381 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alison M. Darcy ◽  
Kristina K. Hardy ◽  
James Lock ◽  
Katherine Bell Hill ◽  
Rebecka Peebles

2021 ◽  
pp. 103985622110286
Author(s):  
Tracey Wade ◽  
Jamie-Lee Pennesi ◽  
Yuan Zhou

Objective: Currently eligibility for expanded Medicare items for eating disorders (excluding anorexia nervosa) require a score ⩾ 3 on the 22-item Eating Disorder Examination-Questionnaire (EDE-Q). We compared these EDE-Q “cases” with continuous scores on a validated 7-item version of the EDE-Q (EDE-Q7) to identify an EDE-Q7 cut-off commensurate to 3 on the EDE-Q. Methods: We utilised EDE-Q scores of female university students ( N = 337) at risk of developing an eating disorder. We used a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve to assess the relationship between the true-positive rate (sensitivity) and the false-positive rate (1-specificity) of cases ⩾ 3. Results: The area under the curve showed outstanding discrimination of 0.94 (95% CI: .92–.97). We examined two specific cut-off points on the EDE-Q7, which included 100% and 87% of true cases, respectively. Conclusion: Given the EDE-Q cut-off for Medicare is used in conjunction with other criteria, we suggest using the more permissive EDE-Q7 cut-off (⩾2.5) to replace use of the EDE-Q cut-off (⩾3) in eligibility assessments.


2014 ◽  
Vol 22 (6) ◽  
pp. 448-453 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paulo P. P. Machado ◽  
Carla Martins ◽  
Ana R. Vaz ◽  
Eva Conceição ◽  
Ana Pinto Bastos ◽  
...  

Obesity ◽  
2008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joshua I. Hrabosky ◽  
Marney A. White ◽  
Robin M. Masheb ◽  
Bruce S. Rothschild ◽  
Carolyn H. Burke-Martindale ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sören Kliem ◽  
Thomas Mößle ◽  
Markus Zenger ◽  
Bernhard Strauß ◽  
Elmar Brähler ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document