scholarly journals Utilizing ecosystem service classifications in multi-criteria decision analysis – Experiences of peat extraction case in Finland

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 ◽  
pp. 101049
Author(s):  
Jyri Mustajoki ◽  
Heli Saarikoski ◽  
Valerie Belton ◽  
Turo Hjerppe ◽  
Mika Marttunen
2016 ◽  
Vol 62 ◽  
pp. 45-56 ◽  
Author(s):  
Johannes Langemeyer ◽  
Erik Gómez-Baggethun ◽  
Dagmar Haase ◽  
Sebastian Scheuer ◽  
Thomas Elmqvist

Author(s):  
Mika Marttunen ◽  
Jyri Mustajoki ◽  
Virpi Lehtoranta ◽  
Heli Saarikoski

AbstractThe ecosystem service (ES) concept has increasingly been applied in environmental planning, while there are several decades of experience in applying multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) in complex planning situations. The aim of this article is to assess how the ES concept has been used in water management projects together with MCDA and to examine the experiences gained and make recommendations to overcome any identified challenges. Our conclusions are based on a systematic analysis of 23 articles that were selected among 206 articles focused on water-related studies using, for example, the terms multi-criteria and ecosystem services in the title, abstract or keywords. Here, we explore (i) at what level of detail ESs are included in the decision hierarchy, (ii) the pros and cons of the complementary use of the two approaches, and (iii) how the potential challenges related to the use of MCDA, such as the large number of criteria, double-counting, or assigning criteria weights, are addressed in the selected cases. The results reveal large differences between the case studies. It is shown that only a few case studies used ES categories to classify criteria in the decision hierarchy, that these cases included different numbers of ES criteria and non-ES criteria, and that most case studies elicited stakeholder preferences in MCDA. Although the paper focuses on water management projects, the conclusions regarding the advantages and pitfalls of the complementary use of the methods, as well as our recommendations, are also applicable to other environmental management contexts.


2016 ◽  
Vol 17 ◽  
pp. 142-151 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Favretto ◽  
L.C. Stringer ◽  
A.J. Dougill ◽  
M. Dallimer ◽  
J.S. Perkins ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 124 ◽  
pp. 104604 ◽  
Author(s):  
David N. Barton ◽  
Håkon Sundt ◽  
Ana Adeva Bustos ◽  
Hans-Petter Fjeldstad ◽  
Richard Hedger ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (10) ◽  
pp. 5627
Author(s):  
Rita Ventura Matos ◽  
Filipa Ferreira ◽  
Liliana Alves ◽  
Elsa Ramos ◽  
Lucrécio Costa ◽  
...  

In this paper, an expedited multi-criteria decision analysis framework, capable of tackling several dimensions for the choice of sanitation services, at an early planning stage is presented. The approach combines geographic information systems aided analysis for onsite solutions, with a multi-criteria decision analysis tool capable of suggesting and ranking several viable offsite treatment alternatives, according to the desired criteria. The framework was applied to four coastal cities in Northern Angola, one of the sub-Saharan countries of the west coast of Africa, thus obtaining an indication for city-wide solutions, as an aid to achieve the goal of ensuring full sanitation coverage in those four locations. It included possible onsite collection and storage interfaces, namely Ventilated Improved Pit latrines, fossa alterna, septic tanks or conventional sewer systems. The study also contributed to an informed decision regarding optimal offsite treatment facility type, namely based on dedicated or combined wastewater and faecal sludge treatment (co-treatment), as well as different options for locations and sanitation technologies. Alternatives were compared and ranked according to ten main criteria concerning social, economic, technological and environmental aspects. This work helped demonstrate the usefulness of decision-aiding tools in the multi-stakeholder and complex context of sanitation in a developing country.


Axioms ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 124
Author(s):  
Dragiša Stanujkić ◽  
Darjan Karabašević ◽  
Gabrijela Popović ◽  
Predrag S. Stanimirović ◽  
Florentin Smarandache ◽  
...  

Some decision-making problems, i.e., multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) problems, require taking into account the attitudes of a large number of decision-makers and/or respondents. Therefore, an approach to the transformation of crisp ratings, collected from respondents, in grey interval numbers form based on the median of collected scores, i.e., ratings, is considered in this article. In this way, the simplicity of collecting respondents’ attitudes using crisp values, i.e., by applying some form of Likert scale, is combined with the advantages that can be achieved by using grey interval numbers. In this way, a grey extension of MCDA methods is obtained. The application of the proposed approach was considered in the example of evaluating the websites of tourism organizations by using several MCDA methods. Additionally, an analysis of the application of the proposed approach in the case of a large number of respondents, done in Python, is presented. The advantages of the proposed method, as well as its possible limitations, are summarized.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document