The effect of density gradient on boundary flow

2016 ◽  
Vol 183 ◽  
pp. 163-178
Author(s):  
Zhuo Zhang ◽  
Zhiyao Song ◽  
Cheng Chen ◽  
Fei Guo ◽  
Dong Zhang ◽  
...  
1991 ◽  
Vol 226 ◽  
pp. 625-654 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew W. Woods

There are two separate mechanisms which can generate a boundary flow in a non-rotating, stratified fluid. The Phillips–Wunsch boundary flow arises in a stratified, quiescent fluid along a sloping boundary. Isopycnals are deflected from the horizontal in order to satisfy the zero normal mass flux condition at the boundary; this produces a horizontal density gradient which drives a boundary flow. The second mechanism arises when there is an independently generated turbulent boundary layer at the wall such that the eddy diffusion coefficients decay away from the wall; if the vertical density gradient is non-uniform the greater eddy diffusion coefficients near the wall result in a greater accumulation or diminution of density near the wall. This produces a horizontal density gradient which drives a boundary flow, even at a vertical wall. The turbulent Phillips Wunsch flow, in which there is a vigorous recirculation in the boundary layer, develops if the wall is sloping. This recirculation produces an additional dispersive mass flux along the wall, which also generates a net volume flux along the wall if the density gradient is non-uniform.We investigate the effect of these boundary flows upon the mixing of the fluid in the interior of a closed vessel. The mixing in the interior fluid resulting from the laminar Phillips–Wunsch-driven boundary flow is governed by \[ \rho_t = \frac{\kappa_{\rm m}}{A}(\rho z A)_z. \] The turbulence-driven boundary flow mixes the interior fluid according to \[ \rho_\frac{1}{A}\left(\kappa_{\rm e}\rho z\int\delta\,{\rm d}s\right)z. \] Here ρ is the density, κm and κe are the far-field (molecular) and effective boundary (eddy) diffusivities, including the dispersion, A is the cross-sectional area of the basin and ∫ δ ds is the cross-sectional area of the boundary layer. The interior fluid is only mixed significantly faster than the rate of molecular diffusion if there is a turbulent boundary layer at the sidewalls of the containing vessel which either (i) varies in intensity with depth in the vessel or (ii) is mixing a non-uniform density gradient. These mixing phenomena are consistent with published experimental data and we consider the effect of such mixing in the ocean.


1979 ◽  
Vol 44 ◽  
pp. 307-313
Author(s):  
D.S. Spicer

A possible relationship between the hot prominence transition sheath, increased internal turbulent and/or helical motion prior to prominence eruption and the prominence eruption (“disparition brusque”) is discussed. The associated darkening of the filament or brightening of the prominence is interpreted as a change in the prominence’s internal pressure gradient which, if of the correct sign, can lead to short wavelength turbulent convection within the prominence. Associated with such a pressure gradient change may be the alteration of the current density gradient within the prominence. Such a change in the current density gradient may also be due to the relative motion of the neighbouring plages thereby increasing the magnetic shear within the prominence, i.e., steepening the current density gradient. Depending on the magnitude of the current density gradient, i.e., magnetic shear, disruption of the prominence can occur by either a long wavelength ideal MHD helical (“kink”) convective instability and/or a long wavelength resistive helical (“kink”) convective instability (tearing mode). The long wavelength ideal MHD helical instability will lead to helical rotation and thus unwinding due to diamagnetic effects and plasma ejections due to convection. The long wavelength resistive helical instability will lead to both unwinding and plasma ejections, but also to accelerated plasma flow, long wavelength magnetic field filamentation, accelerated particles and long wavelength heating internal to the prominence.


Author(s):  
Lee F. Ellis ◽  
Richard M. Van Frank ◽  
Walter J. Kleinschmidt

The extract from Penicillum stoliniferum, known as statolon, has been purified by density gradient centrifugation. These centrifuge fractions contained virus particles that are an interferon inducer in mice or in tissue culture. Highly purified preparations of these particles are difficult to enumerate by electron microscopy because of aggregation. Therefore a study of staining methods was undertaken.


1983 ◽  
Vol 50 (04) ◽  
pp. 848-851 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marjorie B Zucker ◽  
David Varon ◽  
Nicholas C Masiello ◽  
Simon Karpatkin

SummaryPlatelets deprived of calcium and incubated at 37° C for 10 min lose their ability to bind fibrinogen or aggregate with ADP when adequate concentrations of calcium are restored. Since the calcium complex of glycoproteins (GP) IIb and IIIa is the presumed receptor for fibrinogen, it seemed appropriate to examine the behavior of these glycoproteins in incubated non-aggregable platelets. No differences were noted in the electrophoretic pattern of nonaggregable EDTA-treated and aggregable control CaEDTA-treated platelets when SDS gels of Triton X- 114 fractions were stained with silver. GP IIb and IIIa were extracted from either nonaggregable EDTA-treated platelets or aggregable control platelets with calcium-Tris-Triton buffer and subjected to sucrose density gradient centrifugation or crossed immunoelectrophoresis. With both types of platelets, these glycoproteins formed a complex in the presence of calcium. If the glycoproteins were extracted with EDTA-Tris-Triton buffer, or if Triton-solubilized platelet membranes were incubated with EGTA at 37° C for 30 min, GP IIb and IIIa were unable to form a complex in the presence of calcium. We conclude that inability of extracted GP IIb and IIIa to combine in the presence of calcium is not responsible for the irreversible loss of aggregability that occurs when whole platelets are incubated with EDTA at 37° C.


1999 ◽  
Vol 75 (10) ◽  
pp. 1188-1194 ◽  
Author(s):  
Taro MATSUMOTO ◽  
Shinji TOKUDA ◽  
Yasuaki KISHIMOTO ◽  
Tomonori TAKIZUKA ◽  
Hiroshi NAITOU

Author(s):  
Toshiyuki SUZUKI ◽  
Yuki KUBOTA ◽  
Yuichi ISHIDA ◽  
Takuya AOKI ◽  
Kazuhisa FUJITA ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document