Challenges in variant interpretation in prenatal exome sequencing

AbstractCongenital scoliosis (CS) is a lateral curvature of the spine characterized by the presence of vertebral anomalies. Pathogenic genetic variants in the TBX6 gene are one of the causes of CS. However, since many clinically diagnosed cases of CS are without known TBX6 gene variations, this study aims to uncover new genes related to disease susceptibility of CS by exome sequencing (ES). This study employed ES in a cohort of 5 Japanese patients with CS and their healthy parents or a sister for a total of 16 samples among 5 families. Variant interpretation was performed using SIFT, PolyPhen-2, Mutation Taster, and CADD. Four de novo variants were identified by ES and confirmed by Sanger sequencing: 1 frameshift variant (SHISA3) and 3 missense variants (AGBL5, HDAC4, and PDE2A). ES also uncovered 1 homozygous variant in the MOCOS gene. All of these variants were predicted to be deleterious by SIFT, PolyPhen-2, Mutation Taster, and/or CADD. The number of de novo variants identified in this study was exactly what would be expected by chance. Additional functional studies or gathering matched patients using Gene Matcher are needed.

Download Full-text

SUN-721 Implementation of Whole Exome Sequencing for Clinical Diagnostics: A Prospective Busan Kyung-Sang Regional Co-Work Team Experience

Journal of the Endocrine Society ◽

10.1210/jendso/bvaa046.1485 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 4 (Supplement_1) ◽

Author(s):

Jeong Eun Lee ◽

WooYeong Chung ◽

BoLyun Lee ◽

SooHyun Ku ◽

Ga Won Jeon ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Exome Sequencing ◽

Whole Exome Sequencing ◽

Diagnostic Yield ◽

Genetic Disorder ◽

Genetic Diseases ◽

Clinical Diagnostics ◽

Buccal Swab ◽

Variant Interpretation ◽

Pathogenic Variants ◽

Whole Exome

Abstract Purpose: Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) technology is a highthroughput method for genome sequencing which assists clinicians with diagnosis of patients with suspected genetic disorders. This study was to investigate diagnostic yield and clinical utility of whole exome sequencing prospectively in the rare genetic diseases. Method: WES was performed a total of 178 patients with suspected genetic disorder. Buccal swab samples were collected from the patients to extract genomic DNA. WES and variant interpretation was conducted in 3 Billion Inc (Seoul, Republic of Korea), based on their own software. Patients’ phenotype was interpreted by clinical geneticists. Results: WES reported 117 variants (66.7%). According to the ACMG/AMP guidelines, there were 25 pathogenic variants (14%), 37 likely pathogenic variants (32%), and 55 VUS (31%). Among the 117 patients who detected variants, genotype-phenotype correlation was analyzed and resulted that 44 (38%) were found to be apparently causal mutation of the disease, 37 (32%) were not considered the cause of the disease, and 36 (31%) were withheld judgement. Of the VUS variants, 13% were likely to be the causal variants of the disease considering phenotype of patients. Conclusion: This study showed 38% of diagnostic yield in patients with unidentified genetic condition by using prospective WES based on automating variant interpretation system. In the diagnosis of rare genetic disease, we identified the need for a multi-disciplinary team to select appropriate subjects and interpret the clinical significance of the found genetic variants.

Download Full-text