PURPOSE: Several groups and resources provide information that pertains to the
validity of gene-disease relationships used in genomic medicine and research;
however, universal standards and terminologies to define the evidence base for the
role of a gene in disease, and a single harmonized resource were lacking. To tackle
this issue, the Gene Curation Coalition (GenCC) was formed.
METHODS: The GenCC drafted harmonized definitions for differing levels of gene-disease
validity based on existing resources, and performed a modified Delphi survey
with three rounds to narrow the list of terms. The GenCC also developed a unified
database to display curated gene-disease validity assertions from its members.
RESULTS: Based on 241 survey responses from the genetics community, a
consensus term set was chosen for grading gene-disease validity and database
submissions. As of December 2021, the database contains 15,241 gene-disease
assertions on 4,569 unique genes from 12 submitters. When comparing submissions
to the database from distinct sources, conflicts in assertions of gene-disease validity
ranged from 5.3% to 13.4%.
CONCLUSION: Terminology standardization, sharing of gene-disease validity
classifications, and resolution of curation conflicts will facilitate collaborations across
international curation efforts and in turn, improve consistency in genetic testing and
variant interpretation.