The association between poor ovarian response and thrombophilia in assisted reproduction

Author(s):  
Johnny S. Younis ◽  
Moshe Ben-Ami ◽  
Ido Izhaki ◽  
Jimmy Jadaon ◽  
Benjamin Brenner ◽  
...  
2009 ◽  
Vol 92 (6) ◽  
pp. 1862-1869 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kannamannadiar Jayaprakasan ◽  
Halima Al-Hasie ◽  
Rajisha Jayaprakasan ◽  
Bruce Campbell ◽  
James Hopkisson ◽  
...  

Maturitas ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 100 ◽  
pp. 170 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hang Wun Raymond Li ◽  
Tak Ming Cheung ◽  
William Shu Biu Yeung ◽  
Pak Chung Ho ◽  
Ernest Hung Yu Ng

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (6) ◽  
pp. 2110
Author(s):  
Antoine Abu-Musa ◽  
Thor Haahr ◽  
Peter Humaidan

Poor ovarian response (POR) to controlled ovarian stimulation (OS) presents a major challenge in assisted reproduction. The Bologna criteria represented the first serious attempt to set clear criteria for the definition of POR. However, the Bologna criteria were questioned because of the persistent heterogeneity among POR patients and the inability to provide management strategies. Based on these facts, a more recent classification, the POSEIDON (Patient-Oriented Strategies Encompassing IndividualizeD Oocyte Number) classification, was developed to provide a homogeneous and refined definition of POR that significantly reduces the heterogeneity of the Bologna criteria definition of POR and helps in the clinical handling and counseling of patients. In this review, we discuss the impact of the POSEIDON classification on the clinical management of patients with POR.


GYNECOLOGY ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 16 (5) ◽  
pp. 73-77
Author(s):  
R.E. Vanyan ◽  
◽  
N.V. Dolgushina ◽  

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Xinyue Zhang ◽  
Ting Feng ◽  
Jihong Yang ◽  
Yingying Hao ◽  
Suying Li ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Ovarian responsiveness to controlled ovarian stimulation is essential for a successful clinical outcome in assisted reproductive technology (ART) cycles. We aimed to find a suitable new ovulation stimulation protocol for poor ovarian response (POR) patients over 40 years old. Methods A retrospective analysis of 488 ART cycles was evaluated from January 2015 to June 2019. Comparisons were made between the flexible short protocol (FSP), routine short protocol and mild stimulation protocol. Results Compared with the routine short protocol, the FSP delayed the gonadotropin start time and reduced the total gonadotropin dose per stimulation cycle. At the same time, compared with the mild stimulation protocol, the FSP improved oocyte quality and embryo quality and improved embryo implantation potential after transfer. Furthermore, the use of the FSP reduced the probability of premature ovulation, as it inhibited the premature luteinizing hormone (LH) surge to a certain extent. Conclusions The FSP yielded better outcomes than other protocols for patients with POR over 40 years old in our study. However, further prospective studies are needed to provide more substantial evidence and to determine whether the FSP can be successful for both patients over 40 years group and younger POR patients.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document