The role of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in visualizing atherosclerotic carotid plaque vulnerability: Which injection protocol? Which scanning technique?

2015 ◽  
Vol 84 (5) ◽  
pp. 865-871 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roberto Iezzi ◽  
Gianluigi Petrone ◽  
Angela Ferrante ◽  
Libero Lauriola ◽  
Claudio Vincenzoni ◽  
...  
2011 ◽  
Vol 196 (2) ◽  
pp. 431-436 ◽  
Author(s):  
Assaf Hoogi ◽  
Dan Adam ◽  
Aaron Hoffman ◽  
Hedviga Kerner ◽  
Shimon Reisner ◽  
...  

BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (8) ◽  
pp. e047528
Author(s):  
Yang Guang ◽  
Wen He ◽  
Bin Ning ◽  
Hongxia Zhang ◽  
Chen Yin ◽  
...  

ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of deep learning-based detection and classification of carotid plaque (DL-DCCP) in carotid plaque contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS).Methods and analysisA prospective multicentre study was conducted to assess vulnerability in patients with carotid plaque. Data from 547 potentially eligible patients were prospectively enrolled from 10 hospitals, and 205 patients with CEUS video were finally enrolled for analysis. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was used to evaluate the effectiveness of DL-DCCP and two experienced radiologists who manually examined the CEUS video (RA-CEUS) in diagnosing and classifying carotid plaque vulnerability. To evaluate the influence of dynamic video input on the performance of the algorithm, a state-of-the-art deep convolutional neural network (CNN) model for static images (Xception) was compared with DL-DCCP for both training and holdout validation cohorts.ResultsThe AUCs of DL-DCCP were significantly better than those of the experienced radiologists for both the training and holdout validation cohorts (training, DL-DCCP vs RA-CEUS, AUC: 0.85 vs 0.69, p<0.01; holdout validation, DL-DCCP vs RA-CEUS, AUC: 0.87 vs 0.66, p<0.01), that is, also better than the best deep CNN model Xception we had performed, for both the training and holdout validation cohorts (training, DL-DCCP vs Xception, AUC:0.85 vs 0.82, p<0.01; holdout validation, DL-DCCP vs Xception, AUC: 0.87 vs 0.77, p<0.01).ConclusionDL-DCCP shows better overall performance in assessing the vulnerability of carotid atherosclerotic plaques than RA-CEUS. Moreover, with a more powerful network structure and better utilisation of video information, DL-DCCP provided greater diagnostic accuracy than a state-of-the-art static CNN model.Trial registration numberChiCTR1900021846,


2016 ◽  
Vol 41 (10) ◽  
pp. 1973-1979 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhu Wang ◽  
Wei Wang ◽  
Guang-Jian Liu ◽  
Zheng Yang ◽  
Li-Da Chen ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 50 (6) ◽  
pp. 445-451 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jan Edenberg ◽  
Kaja Gløersen ◽  
Herzi Abdi Osman ◽  
Magne Dimmen ◽  
Geir V. Berg

Circulation ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 130 (suppl_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jun Nakamura ◽  
Takamitsu Nakamura ◽  
Juntaro Deyama ◽  
Daisuke Fujioka ◽  
Ken-ichi Kawabata ◽  
...  

Introduction: Extensive neovascularization in atherosclerotic plaque has been shown to be associated with plaque progression and instability, leading to atherosclerotic cardiovascular events. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) of the carotid artery is a potential technique for imaging plaque neovascularization. Hypothesis: Assessment of intra-plaque neovascularization of the carotid artery using quantitative analysis of CEUS provides prognostic information in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). Methods: This study included 206 patients with stable CAD and with carotid intima-media thickness (IMT) > 1.1 mm. They underwent a CEUS examination of the carotid artery and were followed-up prospectively for < 38 months or until a cardiac event (cardiac death, non-fatal myocardial infarction [MI], unstable angina pectoris [uAP] requiring unplanned coronary revascularization, or heart failure requiring hospitalization). The degree of contrast signals measured within the carotid plaque after the intravenous injection of contrast material was quantified by calculating the increase in mean gray scale level within the region of interest of the carotid plaque, expressed as plaque enhanced intensity. Results: During the follow-up period (3 - 38 months, mean 22.8 ± 11.8 months), 31 events occurred (2 cardiac deaths, 7 non-fatal MIs, 16 uAP, and 6 heart failure). Multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis showed that plaque enhanced intensity was a significant predictor of cardiac events independent of traditional risk factors (HR, 1.52; 95% CI, 1.20 - 1.94; p = 0.001). The addition of plaque enhanced intensity had a significant incremental effect on the area under the ROC curve (AUC) generated using baseline model of traditional risk factors (AUC: baseline model 0.69 vs. baseline model + plaque enhanced intensity 0.78, p = 0.03). The addition of the plaque enhanced intensity to the baseline risk factors resulted in net reclassification improvement (NRI) and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) (NRI 0.58, p = 0.003; and IDI 0.078, p = 0.03). Conclusions: The assessment of carotid plaque neovascularization using quantitative analysis of CEUS may be useful for risk stratification in patients with CAD.


2018 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 315-327 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claudia Lucia Piccolo ◽  
Margherita Trinci ◽  
Antonio Pinto ◽  
Luca Brunese ◽  
Vittorio Miele

2016 ◽  
Vol 2 (11) ◽  
Author(s):  
Francesco Loria ◽  
Giuseppe Loria ◽  
Salvatore Basile ◽  
Giuseppe Crea ◽  
Luciano Frosina ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document