Evaluation of PET and MR datasets in integrated 18F-FDG PET/MRI: A comparison of different MR sequences for whole-body restaging of breast cancer patients

2017 ◽  
Vol 89 ◽  
pp. 14-19 ◽  
Author(s):  
Johannes Grueneisen ◽  
Lino Morris Sawicki ◽  
Axel Wetter ◽  
Julian Kirchner ◽  
Sonja Kinner ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Nils Martin Bruckmann ◽  
Julian Kirchner ◽  
Lale Umutlu ◽  
Wolfgang Peter Fendler ◽  
Robert Seifert ◽  
...  

Abstract Objectives To compare the diagnostic performance of [18F]FDG PET/MRI, MRI, CT, and bone scintigraphy for the detection of bone metastases in the initial staging of primary breast cancer patients. Material and methods A cohort of 154 therapy-naive patients with newly diagnosed, histopathologically proven breast cancer was enrolled in this study prospectively. All patients underwent a whole-body [18F]FDG PET/MRI, computed tomography (CT) scan, and a bone scintigraphy prior to therapy. All datasets were evaluated regarding the presence of bone metastases. McNemar χ2 test was performed to compare sensitivity and specificity between the modalities. Results Forty-one bone metastases were present in 7/154 patients (4.5%). Both [18F]FDG PET/MRI and MRI alone were able to detect all of the patients with histopathologically proven bone metastases (sensitivity 100%; specificity 100%) and did not miss any of the 41 malignant lesions (sensitivity 100%). CT detected 5/7 patients (sensitivity 71.4%; specificity 98.6%) and 23/41 lesions (sensitivity 56.1%). Bone scintigraphy detected only 2/7 patients (sensitivity 28.6%) and 15/41 lesions (sensitivity 36.6%). Furthermore, CT and scintigraphy led to false-positive findings of bone metastases in 2 patients and in 1 patient, respectively. The sensitivity of PET/MRI and MRI alone was significantly better compared with CT (p < 0.01, difference 43.9%) and bone scintigraphy (p < 0.01, difference 63.4%). Conclusion [18F]FDG PET/MRI and MRI are significantly better than CT or bone scintigraphy for the detection of bone metastases in patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer. Both CT and bone scintigraphy show a substantially limited sensitivity in detection of bone metastases. Key Points • [18F]FDG PET/MRI and MRI alone are significantly superior to CT and bone scintigraphy for the detection of bone metastases in patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer. • Radiation-free whole-body MRI might serve as modality of choice in detection of bone metastases in breast cancer patients.


2006 ◽  
Vol 33 (7) ◽  
pp. 785-791 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Rousseau ◽  
E. Bourbouloux ◽  
L. Campion ◽  
N. Fleury ◽  
B. Bridji ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e11027-e11027
Author(s):  
Nalini K Rao ◽  
Basavalinga S Ajaikumar ◽  
Kumar G Kallur ◽  
P S Sridhar ◽  
Bhattacharjee Somorat ◽  
...  

e11027 Background: Whole body FDG PET CT is a useful tool in diagnosis, staging and prognosis; and its timely use is critical for early intervention and achieving long term survival in patients with early and advanced breast cancer. Methods: In this observational retrospective study, we report FDG PET CT findings of all breast cancer patients enrolled in our hospital based cancer registry between the years 2008 to 2011. Results: One thousand and fifty three women underwent a total of 1638 scans. Two hundred and forty five scans (14.96%) were done for staging /restaging/diagnosis, 1208 (73.75%) were for response evaluation to chemotherapy and 185 (11.29%) were for surveillance. The median age at diagnosis was 53 years. We identified a possible synchronous breast primary in 28 (2.66%) women and a probable new or existing second non-breast primary in 21(1.99%) women. Internal nodal metastasis was identified in 76 (7.21%) women at diagnosis. There were 26 (2.47%) patients with multicentric tumors. There was an increased uptake in the thyroid gland in 49(2.99%) and in the adrenal in 41 (2.50%) women. There were other random ‘Incidental findings of concern’ in 7 (0.37%) of women, diagnosed either on the CT or PET-CT component. Findings on PET-CT, including- upstaging of the breast primary and unexpected new findings, unrelated to the breast primary, changed the treatment plan in approximately 7% -10% of the patients. We did find that PET-CT did not impact early tumors; however, it did contribute in, 1) the assessment of internal mammary nodes, 2) prognostication based on tumor burden and, 3) aggressive management of oligometastases. Conclusions: Whole body FDG PET CT is a useful tool for staging and prognostication in breast cancer patients. However, the timing of such scans for surveillance needs to be defined for early detection of progression to have an impact on survival.


The Breast ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 18 ◽  
pp. S61-S62
Author(s):  
J.W.H. Tsang ◽  
D. Yeung ◽  
A.C.Y. Chan ◽  
C.H.N. Wong ◽  
L.W.S. Leung ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 28 (4) ◽  
pp. 267-272 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicolas Aide ◽  
Virginie Huchet ◽  
Odile Switsers ◽  
Natacha Heutte ◽  
Thierry Delozier ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document