Implications for restaging in gastric cancer with peritoneal metastasis based on the 15th Japanese Classification of Gastric Carcinoma: An analysis from a comprehensive center

2020 ◽  
Vol 46 (7) ◽  
pp. 1269-1276 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jia-Bin Wang ◽  
Zhi-Yu Liu ◽  
Xiao-Bo Huang ◽  
Qi-Yue Chen ◽  
Qing Zhong ◽  
...  
2011 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 372-377 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takashi Yokoyama ◽  
Kiyoshi Kamada ◽  
Yoshikazu Tsurui ◽  
Hisanori Kashizuka ◽  
Eiji Okano ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 105 (8) ◽  
pp. 800-804 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hiroki Shimizu ◽  
Daisuke Ichikawa ◽  
Shuhei Komatsu ◽  
Kazuma Okamoto ◽  
Atsushi Shiozaki ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. 30-46
Author(s):  
Juhi Singh ◽  
Puneet Kumar ◽  
Khushi Verma ◽  
Satyender Kumar Tiwary ◽  
Gopeshwar Narayan ◽  
...  

Gastric cancer remains highly prevalent and accounts for a notable proportion of global cancer mortality and this is associated with poor survival rates. Understanding the molecular genetic changes of gastric carcinoma may offer an insight into its pathogenesis helps in identifying new biomarkers, aid prognostication, and novel treatment targets. Over a past few decades, advances in technology and high throughput analysis have improved understanding of the molecular genetic aspects of gastric cancer. In this article, hierarchy of the changes at genetic and molecular level including several aspects which are heterogenous and represents a wide spectrum such as tumor suppressor genes, oncogenes, cellcycle regulators, apoptosis, cell-adhesion molecules, loss of heterozygosity, microsatellite instability, and epigenetic changes. The classification of gastric carcinoma at molecular and genetic level as well as hereditary gastric carcinoma is elaborated. The molecular genetic aspects regarding pathogenesis, changes and aberrations of all genes and pathways which are involved in gastric cancer are addressed in this review.


1998 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 25-30 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takashi Aiko ◽  
Mitsuru Sasako

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 27-27
Author(s):  
Furukawa Kenichiro ◽  
Rie Makuuchi ◽  
Keiichi Fujiya ◽  
Noriyuki Nishiwaki ◽  
Hayato Omori ◽  
...  

27 Background: Although prolonged preoperative waiting period (PWP) for gastric cancer (GC) may influence the prognosis, the relationship between PWP and survival outcome has not been elucidated. The aim of this study is to identify the impact of PWP on survival in patients with clinical stage (cStage) II / III GC. Methods: A total of 483 patients who underwent surgery for cStage II / III GC according to Japanese classification of GC, 14th edition, between January 2002 and December 2012 were included. The patients who underwent endoscopic submucosal dissection or neoadjuvant chemotherapy, or who had multiple cancer, special histological types of tumor, or urgent symptoms were excluded. We defined PWP as the period from the date of endoscopy for initial diagnose to that of surgery. Patients were divided into two groups according to PWP; short waiting period group (SWPG, PWP ≤ 60 days, n = 357) and long waiting period group (LWPG, PWP > 60 days, n = 126). Survival outcomes were compared between the groups and multivariate analysis for overall survival (OS) was conducted to identify independent prognostic factors. Results: The median PWP was 49 (21-323) days. In LWPG, patients were significantly older (P = 0.001) and had more comorbidities (P = 0.042) than those in SWPG. Preoperative lymph node status was significantly lower in LWPG (P = 0.031), although there were no differences in tumor depth and cStage between the groups. There was no difference in OS between the groups (5-year OS, SWPG: 61.0%, LWPG: 63.2%, P = 0.612). Multivariate analysis for OS identified age, BMI, histological type, and cStage as independent prognostic factors. Conclusions: Preoperative waiting period appears to have no influence on survival in patients with cStage II / III GC.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document