scholarly journals Risk Factors, Dynamics, and Clinical Consequences of Aortic Neck Dilatation after Standard Endovascular Aneurysm Repair

Author(s):  
Nelson F.G. Oliveira ◽  
José Oliveira-Pinto ◽  
Marie J. van Rijn ◽  
Sara Baart ◽  
Sander Ten Raa ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 74 (2) ◽  
pp. 679
Author(s):  
N.F.G. Oliveira ◽  
J. Oliveira-Pinto ◽  
Marie J. van Rijn ◽  
S. Baart ◽  
S.T. Raa ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 42 (1) ◽  
pp. 106-111 ◽  
Author(s):  
Up Huh ◽  
Chung Won Lee ◽  
Sung Woon Chung ◽  
Sang-pil Kim ◽  
Seunghwan Song ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 46 (3) ◽  
pp. 183-188 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edgar Luis Galiñanes ◽  
Eduardo A. Hernandez-Vila ◽  
Zvonimir Krajcer

Juxtarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) are difficult to treat because they often have little or no proximal aortic neck. Patients with this complex anatomy are not usually candidates for an endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). Chimney-graft EVAR has been introduced, but type Ia endoleak is a typical risk. We have begun using EndoAnchors to determine whether this risk can be reduced. From July 2013 through July 2014, we used the chimney-graft EVAR technique in 5 patients whose juxtarenal AAAs had a short or no proximal aortic neck. During the procedure, we implanted EndoAnchors as needed. Postprocedurally, at 30 days, and through end of follow-up (duration, 11–18 mo), all patients had patent endografts without type Ia endoleak (our primary endpoint), visceral stent-graft thrombosis, or renal complications. One patient who received 4 chimney grafts had a postprocedural type II endoleak, which was treated with embolization. We found it feasible to use EndoAnchors with the chimney-graft technique to prevent type Ia endoleaks in the treatment of juxtarenal AAAs. Further studies are needed to validate this adjunctive technique and to determine its durability.


2016 ◽  
Vol 52 (3) ◽  
pp. 399-400
Author(s):  
N.G. Oliveira ◽  
F.B. Gonçalves ◽  
M.J. van Rijn ◽  
K. Ultee ◽  
S.T. Raa ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
pp. 366-375 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richte C. L. Schuurmann ◽  
Kim van Noort ◽  
Simon P. Overeem ◽  
Ruben van Veen ◽  
Kenneth Ouriel ◽  
...  

Purpose: To describe the added value of determining changes in position and apposition on computed tomography angiography (CTA) after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) to detect early caudal displacement of the device and to prevent type Ia endoleak. Methods: Four groups of elective EVAR patients were selected from a dataset purposely enriched with type Ia endoleak and migration (>10 mm) cases. The groups included cases of late type Ia endoleak (n=36), migration (n=9), a type II endoleak (n=16), and controls without post-EVAR complications (n=37). Apposition of the endograft fabric with the aortic neck, shortest distance between the fabric and the renal arteries, expansion of the main body (or dilatation of the aorta in the infrarenal sealing zone), and tilt of the endograft toward the aortic axis were determined on the first postoperative and the last available CTA scan without type Ia endoleak or migration. Differences in these endograft dimensions were compared between the first vs last scan and among the 4 groups. Results: No significant differences in endograft configurations were observed among the groups on the first postoperative CTA scan. On the last CTA scan before a complication arose, the position of the fabric relative to the renal arteries, expansion of the main body, and apposition of the fabric with the aortic neck were significantly different between the type Ia endoleak (median follow-up 15 months) and migration groups (median follow-up 23 months) compared with the control group (median follow-up 19 months). Most endograft dimensions had changed significantly compared with the first postoperative CTA scan for all groups. Apposition had increased in the control group but had decreased significantly in the type Ia endoleak and migration groups. Conclusion: Progressive changes in dimensions of the endograft within the infrarenal neck could be detected on regular CTA scans before the complication became urgent in many patients.


2013 ◽  
Vol 57 (5) ◽  
pp. 39S
Author(s):  
Lorena Gonzalez ◽  
Neal R. Barshes ◽  
Richard L. Lu ◽  
Kathryn Dougherty ◽  
Zvonimir Krajcer ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
A. Duménil ◽  
J. Gindre ◽  
A. Kaladji ◽  
P. Haigron ◽  
D. Perrin ◽  
...  

The endovascular treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysm (EVAR) consists of inserting a delivery system through intravascular pathway and deploying one or several stent-grafts at the aneurysm site in order to exclude it. This procedure has proven to have a high success rate for eligible patient population and benefits in terms of reduced blood loss, intraoperative morbidity and length of hospital stay. As the selection criteria for EVAR extend progressively due to enhancements in the devices and delivery systems, clinicians are confronted with cases becoming increasingly difficult and demanding procedures with steep learning curve (aortic dissection, branched and fenestrated stent-graft, and complex anatomy with high tortuosity or short aortic neck). In this context patient-specific Finite Element Modeling (FEM) could provide a predictive tool to support endovascular device assessment and selection as well as intervention planning. Given the lack of dedicated solutions, the aim of this study was to assess the feasibility of simulating the main steps of EVAR procedure, from guidewire insertion to stent-graft deployment.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document