A multi-objective and robust optimization approach for sizing and placement of PV and batteries in off-grid systems fully operated by diesel generators: An Indonesian case study

Energy ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 160 ◽  
pp. 410-429 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carlos D. Rodríguez-Gallegos ◽  
Dazhi Yang ◽  
Oktoviano Gandhi ◽  
Monika Bieri ◽  
Thomas Reindl ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Robust Optimization ◽  
Optimization Approach ◽  
Grid Systems ◽  
Multi Objective ◽  
Diesel Generators

Advanced Multi-Objective Robust Optimization Under Interval Uncertainty Using Kriging Model and Support Vector Machine

2018 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tingli Xie ◽  
Ping Jiang ◽  
Qi Zhou ◽  
Leshi Shu ◽  
Yahui Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Support Vector Machine ◽  
Robust Optimization ◽  
Engineering Design ◽  
Kriging Model ◽  
Support Vector ◽  
Svm Classifier ◽  
Optimization Approach ◽  
Design Problems ◽  
Multi Objective ◽  
Engineering Design Problems

There are a large number of real-world engineering design problems that are multi-objective and multiconstrained, having uncertainty in their inputs. Robust optimization is developed to obtain solutions that are optimal and less sensitive to uncertainty. Since most of complex engineering design problems rely on time-consuming simulations, the robust optimization approaches may become computationally intractable. To address this issue, an advanced multi-objective robust optimization approach based on Kriging model and support vector machine (MORO-KS) is proposed in this work. First, the main problem in MORO-KS is iteratively restricted by constraint cuts formed in the subproblem. Second, each objective function is approximated by a Kriging model to predict the response value. Third, a support vector machine (SVM) classifier is constructed to replace all constraint functions classifying design alternatives into two categories: feasible and infeasible. The proposed MORO-KS approach is tested on two numerical examples and the design optimization of a micro-aerial vehicle (MAV) fuselage. Compared with the results obtained from other MORO approaches, the effectiveness and efficiency of the proposed MORO-KS approach are illustrated.

Multi-Objective Optimization in Multi-Attribute and Multi-Unit Combinatorial Reverse Auctions

2017 ◽  
Vol 26 (05) ◽  
pp. 1760016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shubhashis Kumar Shil ◽  
Samira Sadaoui
Keyword(s):  
Quality Measures ◽  
Optimization Approach ◽  
Multi Objective Optimization ◽  
Solution Quality ◽  
Winner Determination ◽  
Multi Objective ◽  
Conflicting Objectives ◽  
Trading Constraints ◽  
Significant Superiority

This study introduces an advanced Combinatorial Reverse Auction (CRA), multi-units, multiattributes and multi-objective, which is subject to buyer and seller trading constraints. Conflicting objectives may occur since the buyer can maximize some attributes and minimize some others. To address the Winner Determination (WD) problem for this type of CRAs, we propose an optimization approach based on genetic algorithms that we integrate with our variants of diversity and elitism strategies to improve the solution quality. Moreover, by maximizing the buyer’s revenue, our approach is able to return the best solution for our complex WD problem. We conduct a case study as well as simulated testing to illustrate the importance of the diversity and elitism schemes. We also validate the proposed WD method through simulated experiments by generating large instances of our CRA problem. The experimental results demonstrate on one hand the performance of our WD method in terms of several quality measures, like solution quality, run-time complexity and trade-off between convergence and diversity, and on the other hand, it’s significant superiority to well-known heuristic and exact WD techniques that have been implemented for much simpler CRAs.

A Multi-Objective Robust Optimization Approach Under Interval Uncertainty Based on Kriging and Support Vector Machine

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tingli Xie ◽  
Ping Jiang ◽  
Qi Zhou ◽  
Leshi Shu ◽  
Yang Yang
Keyword(s):  
Support Vector Machine ◽  
Robust Optimization ◽  
Kriging Model ◽  
Interval Uncertainty ◽  
Support Vector ◽  
Optimization Approach ◽  
Multi Objective ◽  
Large Numbers ◽  
Design Alternatives ◽  
Engineering Design Problems

Interval uncertainty can cause uncontrollable variations in the objective and constraint values, which could seriously deteriorate the performance or even change the feasibility of the optimal solutions. Robust optimization is to obtain solutions that are optimal and minimally sensitive to uncertainty. Because large numbers of complex engineering design problems depend on time-consuming simulations, the robust optimization approaches might become computationally intractable. To address this issue, a multi-objective robust optimization approach based on Kriging and support vector machine (MORO-KS) is proposed in this paper. Firstly, the feasible domain of main problem in MORO-KS is iteratively restricted by constraint cuts formed in the subproblem. Secondly, each objective function is approximated by a Kriging model to predict the response value. Thirdly, a Support Vector Machine (SVM) model is constructed to replace all constraint functions classifying design alternatives into two categories: feasible and infeasible. A numerical example and the design optimization of a microaerial vehicle fuselage are adopted to test the proposed MORO-KS approach. Compared with the results obtained from the MORO approach based on Constraint Cuts (MORO-CC), the effectiveness and efficiency of the proposed MORO-KS approach are illustrated.

An enhanced multi-objective optimization approach for risk allocation in public–private partnership projects: a case study of Malaysia

2014 ◽  
Vol 41 (2) ◽  
pp. 164-177 ◽  
Author(s):  
Valipour Alireza ◽  
Yadollahi Mohammadreza ◽  
Rosli Mohamad Zin ◽  
Nordin Yahaya ◽  
Norhazilan Md. Noor
Keyword(s):  
Public Private Partnership ◽  
Optimization Approach ◽  
Risk Allocation ◽  
Private Partnership ◽  
Multi Objective ◽  
Allocation Process ◽  
Private And Public ◽  
Concession Period

The decision making for risk allocation problems in public–private partnership (PPP) projects is a vital process that directly affects the timeliness, cost, and quality of the project. Fair risk allocation is a vital factor to achieve success in the implementation of these projects. It is essential for private and public sectors to apply efficient risk allocation approaches to experience a more effective process of agreement arbitration and to reduce the appearance of dispute during the concession period. The aim of this study is to develop an optimization approach to enhance risk allocation process in PPP projects. The shared risks in projects are identified through comprehensive literature review and questionnaire survey obtained from Malaysian professionals involved in PPP projects. Objective functions are then developed to minimize the total time and cost of the project and maximize the quality while satisfying risk threshold constraints. The combinatorial nature of the risk allocation problem describes a multi-objective situation that can be simulated as a knapsack problem (KP). The formulation of the KP is described and solved applying genetic algorithm (GA). Due to the flexibility of GA, the results are Pareto Optimal solutions that describe the combinations of risk percentages for shared risks in PPP projects.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document